It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The contract should reflect values shared by the people of Austin, reads the resolution. Those values are outlined as:
Be respectful
Listen to understand
Act with good intentions
Support ideas with evidence and experience
Disagree without being disagreeable
Critique the idea not the person
Invite wonder
Austin’s social contract would not be a legal document, but rather serve as a “written agreement outlining a community’s core values and instructs the direction of laws, regulations, policies, contracts, culture and more.”
originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: ketsuko
Didn't you hear by now that American's minds are being polluted with stupidity since their are very few real jobs these days.
Idle minds are becoming dangerous these days.
originally posted by: ketsuko
You know that mysterious social contract every leftist ever tells you that you signed onto merely be existing in their efforts to convince you that you need to join their collective?
It seems the Au stin City Council felt it needed to be codified. And the only way it could be more perfect is if they wrote it out in crayon. It seems to be more like something you'd find as a set of classroom rules than as a serious city government document a council of adults spent time over.
The contract should reflect values shared by the people of Austin, reads the resolution. Those values are outlined as:
Be respectful
Listen to understand
Act with good intentions
Support ideas with evidence and experience
Disagree without being disagreeable
Critique the idea not the person
Invite wonder
Austin’s social contract would not be a legal document, but rather serve as a “written agreement outlining a community’s core values and instructs the direction of laws, regulations, policies, contracts, culture and more.”
#3 is my personal favorite. It's like the folks on the Austin city council have no familiarity with the popular saying about the road to Hell.
And how on earth does anyone in Austin even figure out if any of this "social contract" stuff is being lived up to? There are no ways in it measure that tiny little detail.
Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has filed House Bill 196, it would require a homeowner to retreat prior to using deadly force in defense of themselves or their property
“I filed this bill because the castle doctrine as it currently exists emboldens people to take justice into their own hands,” she continued. “While theft is obviously wrong, we have laws to address that.
Under the new law, the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible, he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner’s responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner."
“In most instances, the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does,” Meza reasoned. “The homeowner’s insurance [will] reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one, so much the better.”
“The Castle Doctrine will not be reduced. We won’t force Texas homeowners to retreat,” Abbott tweeted. “Especially with the crazy ‘defund police’ ideas, homeowners need to protect themselves now more than ever. We will protect 2nd Amendment rights.”
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: ketsuko
You know that mysterious social contract every leftist ever tells you that you signed onto merely be existing in their efforts to convince you that you need to join their collective?
It seems the Au stin City Council felt it needed to be codified. And the only way it could be more perfect is if they wrote it out in crayon. It seems to be more like something you'd find as a set of classroom rules than as a serious city government document a council of adults spent time over.
The contract should reflect values shared by the people of Austin, reads the resolution. Those values are outlined as:
Be respectful
Listen to understand
Act with good intentions
Support ideas with evidence and experience
Disagree without being disagreeable
Critique the idea not the person
Invite wonder
Austin’s social contract would not be a legal document, but rather serve as a “written agreement outlining a community’s core values and instructs the direction of laws, regulations, policies, contracts, culture and more.”
#3 is my personal favorite. It's like the folks on the Austin city council have no familiarity with the popular saying about the road to Hell.
And how on earth does anyone in Austin even figure out if any of this "social contract" stuff is being lived up to? There are no ways in it measure that tiny little detail.
So is good intentions lead to Hell, are you saying that bad intentions lead to Heaven? Maybe that's the part my missing with some people. They really believe that whatever their motive or action they are going to get into Heaven. Must have some weird spiritual gurus where you come from.
and hey, speaking of things that conservatives are generally all about, anyone wanna know what this list reads like to me? I'm not doing a bit here, this is genuine, what it reminds me of most is the ten commandments.
Only written now instead of 2000 years ago, and with the welfare of the majority in mind instead of just the wealthy.
Maybe i'm insane but doesn't this seem like a good thing?
and hey, speaking of things that conservatives are generally all about, anyone wanna know what this list reads like to me? I'm not doing a bit here, this is genuine, what it reminds me of most is the ten commandments.
Only written now instead of 2000 years ago, and with the welfare of the majority in mind instead of just the wealthy.