It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

7 States Join Texas Lawsuit to Overturn UNCONSTITUTIONAL Election, Its Happening

page: 1
63
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+23 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 12:59 AM
link   
Fresh Sky Cry Soon!

They keep refusing to hear Trumps case. Won't follow the laws. Ignore obvious proven fraud. So these states are joining with Texas. In a law suit to overturn an unconstitutional election!

7 States Join TEXAS Lawsuit to Overturn UNCONSTITUTIONAL Election, ITS HAPPENING


 


MOD NOTE....please read....before posting in this thread.
edit on Wed Dec 9 2020 by DontTreadOnMe because: unnecessary alll caps removed



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 01:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Can you show the docket, please?


(post by odzeandennz removed for political trolling and baiting)
+9 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 01:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Holy smokes! No way the Supreme Court will be able to trash-can this one.


+8 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 01:21 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust



No way the Supreme Court will be able to trash-can this one.

Why not? Trash is trash.
"We don't like what those other states did. Erase their votes."

Right.


But tell me, are those states on the docket?
edit on 12/9/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 01:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Can you show the docket, please?


It probably takes some time to be listed. They mentioned on Twitter that they have filed. Did you watch the video?

Would they follow the procedure and put it on the Docket? They don't follow any other rules.
edit on 9-12-2020 by Doctor Smith because: Added billiant thought.


+8 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 01:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust



No way the Supreme Court will be able to trash-can this one.

Why not? Trash is trash.
"We don't like what those other states did. Erase their votes."
Right.
But tell me, are those states on the docket?

One man's trash is another man's treasure.

What did your docket search turn up?



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 01:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith


It probably takes some time to be listed.
Yeah. Probly.




Did you watch the video?
Does it prove that those states have joined?

Does it matter? Frivolous case is frivolous.

"Wah, we don't like what those states did. Erase their votes".

Pennsylvania said "Erase our votes." Guess what the Court did? They said, "shoo, go away."



They don't follow any other rules.
Who, SCOTUS? The one to which Trump has nominated... how many members?

edit on 12/9/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 01:32 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




What did your docket search turn up?

You're the docket master, I rely on you.



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:05 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:07 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

This guy lays out the argument nicely.







edit on 12/9/2020 by MotherMayEye because: (no reason given)


(post by puzzled2 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:27 AM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Well if twitter says so...

This is legal garbage IMO...and I suspect you know that.

Of course, what do i know.



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Didnt Trump nominate 2 so far?

Either one I guess



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:29 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:33 AM
link   
 




 


+7 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:34 AM
link   
a reply to: odzeandennz



It's in the stock room where they keep Hillary Clinton's servers. I'll grab it

Haha..
Doubt it
Trump has those files too.
He is privy to things we have never seen...or can't unsee!


(post by sunkuong removed for political trolling and baiting)
+3 more 
posted on Dec, 9 2020 @ 02:37 AM
link   
a reply to: sunkuong

Is there something you'd like to expound on or correct about his interpretation of the legal argument?




top topics



 
63
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join