It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The UK government has granted pharmaceutical giant Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued, enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week.
The Department of Health and Social Care has confirmed the company has been given an indemnity protecting it from legal action as a result of any problems with the vaccine.
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used during breast-feeding.
Fertility It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.
In 1976, an outbreak of the swine flu, influenza A virus subtype H1N1 at Fort Dix, New Jersey caused one death, hospitalized 13, and led to a mass immunization program. After the program began, the vaccine was associated with an increase in reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, which can cause paralysis, respiratory arrest, and death. The immunization program was ended after approximately 25% of the population of the United States had been administered the vaccine.
On April 8, an official from the Federal Insurance Company informed Merck & Co., a manufacturer of the swine flu vaccine, that it would exclude indemnity on Merck's product liability for the swine flu vaccine on July 1, 1976. T. Lawrence Jones, president of the American Insurance Association, informed the Office of Management and Budget that the insurance industry would not cover liability for the vaccine unless the government extended liability protection.
A little more than two weeks later, the Ford administration submitted a proposal to Congress that offered indemnity to vaccine manufacturers.
CBS ” 60 MINUTES” documentary on the swine flu epidemic of 1976 in the U.S. It went on air only once and was never shown again. Watch this video documentary and listen to testimony of people who caught Gullian-Barre paralysis because of the swine flu vaccine. They sued the US government for damages.
500 cases of Gullian-Barre paralysis, including 25 deaths—not due to the swine flu itself, but as a direct result of the vaccine. At the time President Gerald Ford, on advice from the CDC, called for vaccination of the ENTIRE population of the United States.
The difference now, and what is the REAL danger, is we have no questioning media.
Laurence Gostin wrote an article that the CDC did not have a "specific set of tests and symptoms to define Guillain-Barré" and that since doctors who reported cases already knew that a link was suspected, a bias in reporting was introduced. She quoted Keiji Fukuda: "if a new virus gets identified or reappears, you don't want to jump the gun and assume a pandemic is happening."
If you’re severely disabled as a result of a vaccination against certain diseases, you could get a one-off tax-free payment of £120,000. This is called a Vaccine Damage Payment.
Guillain-Barre (gee-YAH-buh-RAY) syndrome is a rare disorder in which your body's immune system attacks your nerves. Weakness and tingling in your extremities are usually the first symptoms. These sensations can quickly spread, eventually paralyzing your whole body. In its most severe form Guillain-Barre syndrome is a medical emergency. Most people with the condition must be hospitalized to receive treatment.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: putnam6
We are not actually more intelligent, about the same mostly but we do tend to be less trusting of our government and also far more cynical.
But some will love that claim, actually I have no idea what the average IQ result would be but the elite are about the same, the middle class probably about the same and the working class most likely about the same.
But hey thanks', now IF I can squeeze my suddenly huge British head back through the doorway on the way out.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: putnam6
It may have been very true back in the 70's and 80's at the Academic level since we used to invest hugely in our education system but since the 1980's it has seen vast real world cutback's and many areas especially deprived ones do not do as well as they did in the past, partially due to a serious lack of easily accessible employment in the areas, cut's to our welfare system (something that is very different to what you have stateside) and also these days a lack of decent housing.
Then in the 90's and the early 2000's the government actually dumbed down our academic system, an old A level for example was far more academically intensive than a modern A level just so we are not really educating our kid's to be the world beaters we used to, part of this is politician's driven by globalist agendas wanting to import expertise as if they have forgotten all about the period of the brain drain when we lost our best experts to non other than your nation were they were paid better, had better living standards and with there qualifications could find job's far more easily than they could in the UK.
At the Genetic level there is little or no difference, our education system is now nowhere near as good as it was and I fear for the future generations of our kid's, back in the 70's politicians constantly talked about our children being the future of our nation but these days they simply try to avoid the issue and I can not remember the last time I heard a rousing speech from a politician of any of our party's as to the necessity and value of having out children highly educated, in fact it is almost as if they do not have the good of our children or our nations future in there intention's at all.