It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Short Video Clip: twitter.com...
"There should be at least 3 states before the Supreme Court, with enough electoral votes to change the outcome, before the end of the week."
originally posted by: Ahabstar
a reply to: johnnylaw16
Seems odd that a judicial review of a lessor court’s action or inaction would fall under an arbitrary timeframe of less than six months from the initial action.
Snatch the pebble from my hand, grasshopper. Does not seem a prudent legal course of action. Considering the repercussions of getting it wrong by denying petition to address grievances. People can just go right on down the line to achieve satisfaction without engaging the legal system too.
Joe Biden may not have the mental competency to hold the office, but he probably has the wherewithal to know that he doesn’t want to serve as President in exile for his own safety.
originally posted by: carewemust
Monday, December 7, 2020
Case filed in the U.S. Supreme Court against GEORGIA by Attorney Lin Wood tonight.
It is Attached to Lin's Tweet: twitter.com...
originally posted by: carewemust
Thursday, December 3, 2020
I'm not sure what the Republicans, led by Pennsylvania Congressman Mike Kelly want the U.S. Supreme Court to do, but it's impressive that the case has reached this level. The SCOTUS has categorized it as an "emergency injunction" request.
If the case is accepted, the Justice to rule on it will be Samuel Alito. Alito is the same Justice who told Pennsylvania to remove late-arriving mailed-in ballots from the vote total, because they were illegal. It's not clear if the state complied.
Here are the questions presented to Justice Alito..
Excerpted from this 50 Page PDF document filing: www.supremecourt.gov...
1.) Do the Elections and Electors Clauses of the United States Constitution permit Pennsylvania to violate its state constitution’s restrictions on its lawmaking power when enacting legislation for the conduct of federal elections?
2.) Do the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution permit the dismissal of Petitioners’ claims with prejudice, on the basis of laches, where doing so foreclosed any opportunity for Petitioners to seek retrospective and prospective relief for ongoing constitutional violations?
Docket Case Number is 20A98, for searching at: www.supremecourt.gov...
For those who understand legal terms, what is being requested? (See page 50)
President Trump's legal team is preparing an election-related filing for the U.S. Supreme Court also. If Justice Alito does not accept this case, there is at least one more inbound.
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
The amicus brief for the Republican Party of Pennsylvania was not accepted for filing.
originally posted by: carewemust
It was filed by the wrong Authority. Refiling is in progress.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: carewemust
It was filed by the wrong Authority. Refiling is in progress.
Another bonehead move by the Trump/Republican legal dream team.
originally posted by: carewemust
The Supreme Court has rejected Pennsylvania. Let's see if they will accept Texas.
Fingers crossed!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Just so we all understand what's going on here ... you guys are advocating that the Supreme Court of the United States, set aside the legislative authority of the State of Pennsylvania?
Not only that, you're asking that the decision of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania be discarded which was unanimous?
You do realize that's what you're suggesting? What happened to the sanctity of Amendment X? States Rights?
PFft.
originally posted by: carewemust
The Supreme Court has rejected Pennsylvania.
Short and to-the-point.
mobile.twitter.com...
Let's see if they will accept Texas.
Fingers crossed!
originally posted by: johnnylaw16
originally posted by: carewemust
The Supreme Court has rejected Pennsylvania.
Short and to-the-point.
mobile.twitter.com...
Let's see if they will accept Texas.
Fingers crossed!
Who could have seen this coming . . . ?