It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Attorney general Barr says if the Director of National Intelligence confirms this, the doj will act.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
They are his words. Take it up with him.
His whole presentation was about them monitoring Dominion.com network traffic. What, do you think the data that he said was sent to Scytl Frankfurt servers was your granma looking for pr0n?
-MM
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Dutchowl
Which would explain the ankle monitor Usurper Joe is now sporting. I hope that piggy is squealing.
Why would they need to put a monitor on him? Is that so it makes it easier for the White Hats to fast rope in when the time comes?
I'm. pretty sure that's what they call stepping on your own dick.
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Talk about getting caught with your hand in the cookie jar...
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
a reply to: network dude
Yes, there were Scytl servers in Frankfurt - he mentions data being sent from Dominion networks to Frankfurt and then later on he mentions Scytl.
-MM
Does anyone dispute his testimony, or is it factual and accepted? That's impportant.
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: Gryphon66
It's strange that none of these experts are willing to speak up in court ... isn't it?
It's strange that they're not willing to allow these experts to speak up in court and keep dismissing the cases before these experts can testify, isn't it? What are they worried about if these "experts" have no evidence?
TCB
originally posted by: Jimy718
originally posted by: TrulyColorBlind
originally posted by: Gryphon66
It's strange that none of these experts are willing to speak up in court ... isn't it?
It's strange that they're not willing to allow these experts to speak up in court and keep dismissing the cases before these experts can testify, isn't it? What are they worried about if these "experts" have no evidence?
TCB
Perhaps; wasting the Court's time, and the People's money?
originally posted by: Annee
Here’s a transcript from the Philadelphia hearing.
Everything this retired colonel is saying is speculation. It’s all about what can be done. Sure, he can say specific incidences look suspicious — and then speculate on what could have happened. But - again - he can not prove it actually happened in this instances.
...
originally posted by: Jimy718
Perhaps; wasting the Court's time, and the People's money?