OK Folks, This is how this next month is going down Get ready!

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Its 9 words. Not a comparison to the whole plot of star wars. You people applauding and begging for martial law and the suspension of the constitution are the dangerous ones. All because your feelz are hurt from an election. Guess what? In 4 years there will be another one. Regardless of your sky screaming.

Who wants a "suspension of the Constitution" is your side. The side that wants to ignore the obvious massive voter fraud... The ones whom voted for people that actually stated they want to change the laws of the U.S. and want to destroy the U.S. Constitution...

You, and others like you, are siding with the people whom have stated they want and will get rid of the Electoral College if they win...

You, and others like you, are siding with the people whom have stated they want to defund and even abolish the police meanwhile giving police powers to "civilians whom will not arrest criminals, and won't be able to defend themselves from criminals...

You, and others like you, are siding with the people whom have stated they want to make Puerto Rico, a socialist country with a socialist economy that is bankrupt, into another U.S. state, and to make ONE city DC into a state which will make sure that no republican POTUS is ever elected, and only democrat/democrat socialists/socialists/communists and even fascists are the only POTUS ever chosen from now on...

You, and others like you, are siding with the people whom have stated they will pack the courts, and apparently they also want to make the U.S. Supreme Court capable of writing new laws since they keep claiming that one Justice, Barret, will be able to abolish by herself Roe vs Wade...

You, and others like you, are already siding with the people whom changed voter rules and laws which the U.S. Constitution states can only be done by the legislature of those states and/or Congress...

You, and others like you, are already siding with the people ignoring the U.S. Constitution as you all claim Joe Biden is already "president-elect" because the lying media, and left-wing/never-Trump leaders claim Biden won, when the U.S. Constitution states only Congress, which includes the Senate, makes that call...

You have already sided with the same people whom are already ignoring the U.S. Constitution...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

You have me confused with a liberal. Dont even need to read the rest of your post. I voted for Trump. I'm just not calling for martial law.

a reply to: FauxMulder

BTW, you are also siding with the same people whom have stated they will go after Trump supporters and those whom were part of the Trump administration, as well as going after President Trump and his family because they all stood up to your elites and the establishment while fighting for regular Americans... Despite the fact that already several Trump officials have been made bankrupt as they fought off the lies that people like you sided with, such as "the fake Trump-Russia collusion hoax..."

Your side already has several officials stating they want lists of people that helped President Trump, including voters... They will once again go after Trump and his entire family despite the fact that for 4 years your side used LIES to attempt to change the 2016 elections... Yet you want to claim you are siding with the U.S Constitution?... GTFO

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

You seem very confused. Just because I dont want martial law does not mean I'm a leftist or side with anyone. Martial law is not the answer. Maybe you think you're debating someone else here?

Have fun debating arguments I've never made.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

You have me confused with a liberal. Dont even need to read the rest of your post. I voted for Trump. I'm just not calling for martial law.

Naa, you are like the Georgia governor, claiming to be Republican and pro-Constitution yet you want to deny the obvious massive voter fraud, and you want in power the side that has stated they will destroy the Republic & the U.S. Constitution...

BTW, Lt. Gen. Flynn called for "limited Martial Law" just to make another election because of the obvious massive voter fraud. BTW, the people giving you stars are the people on the other side... The same ones that want to destroy the Republic, want the U.S. to lose it's sovereignty, and for one group of elites to have control over the U.S., and all others countries "to fight climate change, COVID19, etc for the good of all...

originally posted by: FauxMulder

You seem very confused. Just because I dont want martial law does not mean I'm a leftist or side with anyone. Martial law is not the answer. Maybe you think you're debating someone else here?

Have fun debating arguments I've never made.

Martial Law is not the same as "limited Martial Law to make another election because of the obvious voter fraud..."

Limited forms of Martial Law have been used already several times in the U.S...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Its amazing the amount of leftist crap you're trying to equate with not wanting martial law. Maybe take a break from the internet. Get some fresh air.

Peace.

a reply to: FauxMulder

BTW, just to show you how wrong you are. The lockdowns are a form of "limited Martial Law..." But what makes it bad is that lies are being used for "limited Martial Law" throughout the U.S.

In case you didn't know Abraham Lincoln called for Martial Law during the Civil War... and since that time that Martial Law hasn't been recalled...

The Federal government also called for Martial Law in Hawaii during WWII...

Even Obama enforced martial Law by executive order. Even the Huff, a left-wing source, pointed it out...

Martial Law by Executive Order

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Its amazing the amount of leftist crap you're trying to equate with not wanting martial law. Maybe take a break from the internet. Get some fresh air.

Peace.

It's amazing how you still keep calling it "Martial Law" when what Lt. Gen. Flynn called is LIMITED Martial Law for a new election... Limited forms of Martial Law has been used several times throughout the history of the U.S....

Who needs the fresh air is you...

originally posted by: CharlesT
a reply to: network dude

the incoming administration, and a majority in the House.

All of these people will be in handcuffs.

None of these people are getting put in handcuffs.

I think some of y’all need to calm TF down.

Trump lost. It happens. It’s actually pretty obvious why it happened if you stop idolizing Trump like he’s a god.

Are there some oddities around the election? Yeah - there are.

Do we have any “smoking gun” or “irrefutable” proof?

Nope. Nada. Nothing.

Until we get real evidence that will be heard by a real court and not just a bunch of lawsuits for the sake of lawsuits, I suggest letting your doom porn habit chill out a little bit.

originally posted by: LordAhriman
How about just a little bit of proof before we go full dictatorship/military takeover?

Have you not seen enough?
You are like the man who saw a flying saucer land a few feet away in his garden and then demanded evidence that UFOs exist.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Its 9 words. Not a comparison to the whole plot of star wars. You people applauding and begging for martial law and the suspension of the constitution are the dangerous ones. All because your feelz are hurt from an election. Guess what? In 4 years there will be another one. Regardless of your sky screaming.

Again with your inability to understand what people have said. A limited Martial Law just for a new election is not the same as calling for Martial Law.... Limited forms of Martial Law have been used in the past, including by Obama...

BTW, we are not using "our feelings as an excuse", we are using the fact that there are witnesses and there is evidence that there was voter fraud.


beta.documentcloud.org...

Let's ask this question first: has even one prediction by the particular faction been accurate?

They've been claiming a "limited miltary takeover" since 2017. Have we seen one? Nope.

Was Clinton/Obama/Biden/Comey arrested/indicted/executed? Nope.

Did the 25k indictments to clear out the Deep State ever materialize? Nope.

Any mass arrest of satanic pedophile rings? Nope.

Some of you need to look at what the extremism you have facilitated has become long and hard and ask yourself is this conservatism? Is this standing up for the Constitution and the rule-of-law?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Why are you replying to a post you already replied to almost 3 weeks ago?

You still stuck on this "limited" martial law thing? Must be like being a little bit pregnant.

originally posted by: FauxMulder
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Why are you replying to a post you already replied to almost 3 weeks ago?

You still stuck on this "limited" martial law thing? Must be like being a little bit pregnant.

You can't even understand how a logical analogy is used... Martial Law can be limited, pregnancy cannot be limited unless the pregnant woman aborts...

No wonder you can't understand the difference between full blown Martial Law, or limited Martial Law...

a reply to: Gryphon66

First of all, don't talk about "what is Constitutional and what isn't" when your side wants to abolish the Electoral College.
They want to pack the Supreme Court and make it possible for the Supreme Court to write laws.
Your side wants to abolish, or defund the police, and give policing powers to a "civilian force of their making."
They want to make a socialist country with a failed "socialist economy" into a new state, and a liberal/progressive city, DC, also into a state.

Second of all, your side has already stated they want to get rid of capitalism and claim "a new form of socialism/aka democratic socialism" will be implemented by them, which sorry to rain in your parade but every socialist/communist ahole dictator/s also claimed the same thing about "their new branch of socialism will be better..." But in reality they all turn into # holes that commit mass murder, abolish individual rights for the good of "x", forever impoverish the people, and destroy the economy of those nations "for the good of the collective."

BTW, your side has committed real crimes. Just because a real prosecutor with balls, and/or isn't corrupt hasn't been found by Trump when RINOs keep giving him bad advice and hence haven't put any of your corrupt and criminal overlords doesn't mean your side didn't commit crimes... After all, your side bankrupted families like that of Lt. Gen. Flynn, Trump campaign advisors, etc over "Russian lies" made up by your witch of the west Shillary, to distract the American people from her real crimes.

In the "brave new socialist' world of the left if you are a conservative/lean to the right and dare to go against the left people can be imprisoned with no evidence of any real crime, or evidence except "never corroborated claims and lies made up by the left."

Plenty of people have been banbkrupt, or are in jail, and the only true crime they committed was going against your draconian left-wing leaders, or old crimes are used to imprison people like Manafort, meanwhile the pro-ShIllary people whom committed the same crimes as Manafort were given full immunity.

You should stop trying to use the "nobody has been jailed, hence no crime was committed" argument because it has been clear since even the candidacy of Trump for POTUS, that your side commit high crimes and they get away with it, while lies, or old crimes having nothing to do with "Russia collusion" are used to put people in prison for being in the wrong political side...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Still expecting a Trump victory or something?

He’s not suggesting all of what you said at all.

He’s saying that, collectively, everyone has made a bunch of extreme statements/promises and yet what’s transpired? Effectively nothing - and certainly nothing as extreme as advertised or wished for. So, maybe it’s time to move away from the extreme and actually focus on the process of getting someone elected in 2024 who isn’t a far-left liberal.

That seems like a way, way more productive use of time.

While I’m here... for all the commentary you espouse, do you recall both Bush administrations? Yeah... nothing to see there at all... particularly when Sr. was a spook. I mean, nothing could have possibly happened that wasn’t above board.

Where are those WMDs again?

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Adding one more point I should have made before...

When someone spends a lot of time NOT focusing on your own problems, they get larger. When that then leads to what’s posted above about all of the things OTHER people/parties/entities have done wrong that are SO much worse/unforgivable/terrible/etc. than ANYTHING that your preferred person/party/entity/YOU have done - all objectivity is lost.

This blinds people into seeing the world as black or white, right or wrong, etc. - and thus removes any need to actually question ones own beliefs, strengths/weaknesses, etc. Thus, they’re stuck. They stop growing. The world will pass them by.

This is why people who can’t change/are stuck in the past and rail against the present and future fall behind.

This means something only becomes less relevant over time - because others are moving forward and time itself is moving forward. New humans are born in this future who see the world differently - only further dating those stuck in their ways and making them even less useful/correct/relevant.

They then fixate on why the world changing is bad - which it is for them - because they never changed with the world.

Think about it - who gets more wealthy? The historian or the technology inventor? The technology inventor.

So, if you’re not leading the change, developing the change or understanding the change to work with it (ditching the “this is how it’s supposed to be!” mentality) - you’re going to fall behind, get angry and lose.

And that’s the current state of the GOP. They’re so stuck that months later people actually still believe Trump gets four more years.

He doesn’t get four more years.

And GOP supporters are wasting their time focusing on the past, how it should be and a whole bunch of other stuff - not the future.

This is why the GOP is going to be irrelevant before you know it - because supporters are stuck in a world that isn’t functionally relevant today.

They could change course and focus on winning, but they just can’t. And that’s disappointing.

originally posted by: CharlesT
If this political coup were made into a movie, how do you think the ending of that movie would turn out? My movie would begin to build to it's climactic ending on December 14, 2020. The states vote and deliver their tallies to their state and the state delivers them to 6 federal recipients. If Biden gets 270 or more electoral votes, Donald J. Trump invokes Executive order,

"Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election".

This is when Trump mobilizes the US Army to action.

On January 6,2021, With all of congress combined into one great assembly to count votes and declare a winner, suddenly, US Army vehicles pull up to the steps of the Capitol where a company of Army Rangers storm out, go directly down to the lower chamber where all of our government is congregated and takes control of every exit.

"By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America"...
Foreign Policy

Issued on: September 12, 2018

www.whitehouse.gov...


crsreports.congress.gov...

Updated October 22, 2020The Electoral College: A2020 Presidential Election Timeline December 14, 2020:ElectorsVotein Their StatesMonday after the second Wednesday in December of presidential election yearsis set (3 U.S.C. §7) as the date on which the electors meetand vote. In 2020, the meeting ison December 14.Electoral college delegationsmeet separately in their respective states and the District of Columbiaat placesdesignated by theirstate legislature.The electors vote by paper ballot, casting one ballot for President and one for Vice President. The electors count the resultsand then sign six certificates, each of whichcontainstwo lists, oneof which includesthe electoral votes for the President, the other,electoral votes for the Vice President, each of which includes the names of persons receiving votes and the number of votes cast for them.These are known as Certificates of the Vote, which the electors are required to sign. They then pair the six Certificates of Ascertainment provided by the state governors with the Certificates of the Vote, and sign, seal,and certify them(3 U.S.C. §§8-10). The sixcertificates are then distributed byregistered mail as follows: (1) one certificate to thePresident of the U.S. Senate (the Vice President); (2)two certificates to the secretary of state(or equivalent officer)of the statein which the electors met; (3) two certificates to the Archivist; and (4) one certificate to the judge of the U.S. district court of the district in which the electors met(3 U.S.C. §11).December 23, 2020:Certificates Must Be Deliveredto the Designated OfficialsCertificates of electoral vote results must be delivered to above mentioned officersby the fourth Wednesday in December, in 2020, by December 23(3 U.S.C. §12). Failure to Deliver Certificates by December 23If the certificates from any state have not been deliveredby December 23, 2020, the President of the Senate, or in their absence the Archivist, isrequired to request the secretary of state or equivalent officerin that state to send one of the copies they holdto the President of the Senate by registered mail(3 U.S.C. §12, 13). TheCode also directs themto send a messenger to the judge of the U.S. district court in the state directing thejudge to transmit the certificatethey hold by “hand ...to the seat of government.” January 6, 2021: Joint Session of Congress to Count Electoral Votes and Declare Election ResultsMeetsOn January 6, or another date setby law, the Senate and House of Representatives assemble at 1:00 p.m.in a joint session at the Capitol, in the Housechamber, to count the electoral votesand declare the results(3 U.S.C. §15). The Vice President presidesasPresident of the Senate. The Vice Presidentopens the certificates and presents them to four tellers, two from each chamber. The tellers read and make a list of the returns. When the votes have been ascertained and counted, the tellerstransmitthemto the Vice President.If one of the tickets has received a majority of 270 or more electoral votes, the Vice President announcesthe results, which “shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President andVice President.”Joint Session Challenges to Electoral Vote ReturnsWhile the tellers announce the results,Members may object to the returns from any individual state as they are announced. Objections to individual state returns must be made in writing by at least one Member each of the Senate and House of Representatives. If an objection meets these requirements, the joint session recesses and the two houses separate and debatethe question in their respective chambers fora maximum oftwo hours. The two houses then vote separately to accept or reject the objection. They then reassemble in joint session, and announce the results of their respectivevotes. An objection to a state’s electoral vote must be approved by both houses in order for any contested votes to be excluded.For additional information, see CRS Report RL32717, Counting Electoral Votes: An Overview of Procedures at the Joint Session, Including Objections by Members of Congress, coordinated by Elizabeth Rybicki and L. Paige Whitaker. January 20, 2021: Presidential Inauguration

This OP hasn't aged well then!
Surely you now realise the game is up.