It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Serbian Warning: What Happened When Their Elections Were Stolen in 2000

page: 1
37
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+15 more 
posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:16 PM
link   
The truth that so many left-wingers want to ignore... The U.S. elections were stolen by democrats/socialists... Here is a Serbian whom witnessed what happened in his own country, and knows the same thing just happened in the U.S.




This election should NEVER be conceded. The socialists changed the rules in democrat cities and states, and it was the decision of local and state governments which is unconstitutional.

Once socialism it's implemented in the U.S. control over the Republic by the people will NEVER be taken back...
Trump and Republicans better not concede this election.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:17 PM
link   
ohhh well if a random Serbian said so on the YouTubez....


+24 more 
posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
ohhh well if a random Serbian said so on the YouTubez....


Yeah, you keep lying like you always do. It's all you know how to do.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:22 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

I'm just curious when we are suppose to report to the gulags once Biden and co take the white house... I know AOC has her "lists" being generated now...


+8 more 
posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:24 PM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Says a random person on a conspiracy website. What's you're point? You want to see his social media credit score? Get a thumbs up from snopes that this information is acceptable for your consumption?

I haven't watched it yet, but we can all view the video and make our own determinations about it's validity.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
The socialists changed the rules in democrat cities and states, and it was the decision of local and state governments which is unconstitutional.


Uh, hate to break it to you son but the Constitution actually leaves it to the States to set their own election rules.

Looking forward to drinking more of your salty tears of loss.




edit on 7-11-2020 by AugustusMasonicus because: dey terk er election



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:26 PM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheGroin

It has more validity than a slurred statement by toothless joe


+10 more 
posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:28 PM
link   


The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
...

constitutioncenter.org...

This alone is enough to contest the election result. Since local and state officials were the ones that decided to change the election rules without Congressional approval, the election is invalid and a recount must be made.


+1 more 
posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
The socialists changed the rules in democrat cities and states, and it was the decision of local and state governments which is unconstitutional.


Uh, hate to break it to you son but the Constitution actually leaves it to the States to set their own election rules.

Looking forward to drinking more of your salty tears of loss.



Like always your ignorance gets the better of you. Do you understand English or do you need me to translate for you the following fact?...



The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate. The Clause directs and empowers states to determine the “Times, Places, and Manner” of congressional elections, subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations. It grants each level of government the authority to enact a complete code for such elections, including rules concerning public notices, voter registration, voter protection, fraud prevention, vote counting, and determination of election results. Whenever a state enacts a law relating to a congressional election, it is exercising power under the Elections Clause; states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures.
...

constitutioncenter.org...



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:32 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Read your own source's first line:


The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.



DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:32 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

They were not stolen funny people keep saying this with no proof. Do you realize how hard that would be to do.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: dragonridr
They were not stolen funny people keep saying this with no proof. Do you realize how hard that would be to do.


Don't interrupt him, I need him to be fully focused on salt production.


+5 more 
posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Read your own source's first line:


The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.



DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.


subject to Congress’s authority to “make or alter” state regulations...

Of course you also forgot...


...states do not have any inherent authority to enact such measures....



Don't forget that part... DUUUUUURRRRR indeed...


edit on 7-11-2020 by ElectricUniverse because: add comment.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:34 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Over Senate and House elections, nothing about el Presidente, is there?

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: notquiteright
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


I haven't watched it yet, but we can all view the video and make our own determinations about it's validity.


So you might end up agreeing with OSOTC as you have not watched it yet, doubtful I know but possible



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:37 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

What? That dude was my neighbor in nyc and has a heavy new jersey accent. Big Hillary guy. His name is phil. He only has 4 toes on his right foot. It’s all factual. I promise.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Over Senate and House elections, nothing about el Presidente, is there?

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!


ROFLMAO... You yet again ignore the first part...


The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S.


ALL elections...



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S.


Here's the full sentence, it doesn't end where you are cutting it off with your typical disingenuous posting style:


The Elections Clause is the primary source of constitutional authority to regulate elections for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate.



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

We're totally screwed



posted on Nov, 7 2020 @ 01:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
The socialists changed the rules in democrat cities and states, and it was the decision of local and state governments which is unconstitutional.


Uh, hate to break it to you son but the Constitution actually leaves it to the States to set their own election rules.

Looking forward to drinking more of your salty tears of loss.





Noooooo!!

They stole it man, they stole a whole election under the noses of all party reps, public servants, international observers et al.

Haven’t you seen the videos of all the theft of votes?



new topics

top topics



 
37
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join