Exclusive: Hunter Biden Pictures of Himself Half Naked and Exposed With Certain Minor

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Then why are you here debating the topic? It doesnt matter right?

originally posted by: drewlander
Then why are you here debating the topic? It doesnt matter right?

I said it already about 1,000 times, it's distracting from the REAL issues.

But useful idiots gonna idiot.

a reply to: ManFromEurope
Article states that his assets exceed his liabilities.... by over a billion.
Owned?
Ok.

Emails have been released that aren't blurry.
The minor in question has a mother.
That mother did not want Hunter to be with that minor without supervision by Joe Biden.
The reasons have to do with him being naked in her presence and smoking crack.
Yup... nothing to it... all made up Russian stories... Right?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777
Yes your mental gymnqstics. I said its dumb to pretend that proof is needed...

A pixelated photo is not good enough. Where's the actual evidence?

The evidence is The Gateway Pundit. That source does well here, many times it will be the only source in a thread and those typically have many stars and flags.

What erks me is pundit is literally in the name and people still hold it on a pedestal above most anything else.

Hunter is a super seedy character, whom we all know is capable of blatantly breaking the law. But there's plenty that is proven fact to focus on instead of uncorroborated allegations.

The same people who will repeat this as fact are the same who with be the first to a thread to call other OPs and idiot for posting allegations from unnamed sources. Unfortunately partisans will always support double standards that fit their narrative and agenda.

originally posted by: blueman12
Is it possible that this is fake and how do they know it's a minor?

More Pictures

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: drewlander
Then why are you here debating the topic? It doesnt matter right?

I said it already about 1,000 times, it's distracting from the REAL issues.

But useful idiots gonna idiot.

Oh BS. You didn’t have a problem trying to paint Rudy as some unethical perv when he didn’t do a damn thing wrong but yet you defend this POS hanging with a minor nude and think it’s just a effn distraction. The POS that’s our possible new president’s kid and corrupt business partner and it’s just a distraction? Sounds like more self contradictory BS to me.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

And pedo’s gonna pedo. But you are ok with that got it.

originally posted by: SirKonstantin

originally posted by: blueman12
Is it possible that this is fake and how do they know it's a minor?

More Pictures

now thats a propaganda plattform! and you really use this for information?

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

A pixelated photo is not good enough. Where's the actual evidence?

News flash: There isn't any.

There is far more evidence of possible abuse than some bruises on a child or bad school attendance. If those things justify investigation only a moron woild say all the "smoke" here does not.

What is your proof of financial crimes etc. and if you have none why do you support investigating that further? FYI without the investigations already conducted on that front, there would still be little to no evidence..

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard for conviction, not the standard for fuether investigating you knucklehead.. most evidence comes from the investigation (DUH).

originally posted by: oloufo

originally posted by: SirKonstantin

originally posted by: blueman12
Is it possible that this is fake and how do they know it's a minor?

More Pictures

now thats a propaganda plattform! and you really use this for information?

I do NOT.

I just wanted to show you that there are tons of photos implicating this guy, not just as a pedo.... It would be easy to say the limited photos could be "doctored", well here are a lot more...I would hope that someone didn't take there time to alter all these photos...

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: drewlander
Then why are you here debating the topic? It doesnt matter right?

I said it already about 1,000 times, it's distracting from the REAL issues.

But useful idiots gonna idiot.

You don't consider this topic a REAL issue ?

originally posted by: Ringsofsaturn777

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

A pixelated photo is not good enough. Where's the actual evidence?

News flash: There isn't any.

There is far more evidence of possible abuse than some bruises on a child or bad school attendance. If those things justify investigation only a moron woild say all the "smoke" here does not.

What is your proof of financial crimes etc. and if you have none why do you support investigating that further? FYI without the investigations already conducted on that front, there would still be little to no evidence..

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is the standard for conviction, not the standard for fuether investigating you knucklehead.. most evidence comes from the investigation (DUH).

Agreed.

This is the most common sense post on the subject.

Not partisan, but common sense....which both sides are currently lacking...

originally posted by: TerryDon79

And by that you really mean “I just need the tiniest of reasons to go watch kiddie porn”.

Sorry, “investigate”.

No... by that i mean what I actually said...

The government and law enforcement routinely investigate suspicions of child abuse and neglect on far less.. like.. just a phone call from a neighbor that hears yelling and crying.. dumbo.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
The same people who will repeat this as fact are the same who with be the first to a thread to call other OPs and idiot for posting allegations from unnamed sources. Unfortunately partisans will always support double standards that fit their narrative and agenda.

Yup, and now they are shooting themselves and their party in the foot by 'going down the rabbit hole'.

originally posted by: mtnshredder
Oh BS. You didn’t have a problem trying to paint Rudy as some unethical perv when he didn’t do a damn thing wrong but yet you defend this POS hanging with a minor nude and think it’s just a effn distraction.

Rudy? Who gives a crap about Rudy?

Hey, go ahead, makes this an issue, no one cares. What they should care about gets smeared with this crap.