Global Covid Report

I find this report from comment section on youtube video i was watching. 73 pages all kinds of information about this plandemic .


Global Covid Report




It`s very different story than what the goverments are telling us about covid-19 ....

This is kinda fascinating. I've scanned about 10 pages so far

a reply to: Kenzo

S&F

This is what those of us who think, already knew. But I did forward it to all the NPC's I know....cause....SCIENCE!

a reply to: theatreboy


Yeeh , is there a way to download the report ? I could not find a way to download...


This migh cause cognitive dissonance to NPC`s after they read it

did anyone notice the website at the bottom of the cover page in EXTREMELY small print they DELIBERATELY made the print really small I had to work to with magnifier and hitting the + sign and what not........I always like to research the group that puts theses things out

it is the lewrockwell.com site

here is what media bias/fact check had to say about them ...they are rated a questionable source 45 out of 180 this is media/factchecks definition of questionable source

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specificall


Lew Rockwell - Questionable - Right Bias - Conservative - Libertarian - Fake News - Not CredibleFactual Reporting: Mixed - Not always Credible or Reliable



Overall, we rate Lew Rockwell Questionable based on Extreme Right Bias, promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience.

Rockwell is a website that promotes conspiracies, pseudoscience, and fringe economic theories. Lew Rockwell uses minimal loaded words in their headlines and articles, but they typically source to far-right or questionable sources such as Brietbart, Zerohedge, and the #1 purveyor of pseudoscience Joseph Mercola. Some of the topics you will find on the website are those related to anti-vaccination propaganda, Mind Control, False Flags, and anti-immigration articles from other questionable sources. Further, the Lew Rockwell website has been placed on the Hatewatch list by the Southern Poverty Law Center. A factual search also reveals that Lew Rockwell has a very poor track record with fact checkers. For more information I recommend, RationalWiki who has done a fantastic job of putting all of it together.


a reply to: theatreboy

a reply to: research100

I did not find it...must be very small text .


lewrockwell.com has quite a lot authors



LewRockwell.com authors

yes I am looking over the link point number 9 says we didn't need to shut down the schools because transmission to children is so low......they did NOT mention the teachers!!!!!! how do you leave out the teachers??????


a reply to: research100

I downloaded the original RC test pdf the other day so I have evidence that it says 'not for diagnostic use'. Then I read up how we still can not test for covid, only Corona RNA bits.
This led me to check out other tests and I found an Indian company that sells these tests claiming that they are superior diagnostic tests that will reliably test for covid...

This is of course absolutely impossible. I tried to find out more but they don't explain anything and just await big orders. If one dodgy company can make money on lies, can you imagine the outcome of such immoral tests?

Sorry I can't link. On the phone and pressed for time. But we need regulations. This is where greedy criminals can get rich quick. The same with vaccines. Especially in the UK where accountability is put on hold for any vaccine producers. Can you imagine what concoctions will enter the market and are being put into people and children?

I worked for many years in pharmaceutical labs. Even the most stringent ones can produce duds. Now imagine 3rd world companies promising cheap tests and vaccines.

It's not that people have done fake foods etc forever. Not caring who gets hurt, just for quick money.

when you turn the first page on the link in the first post it is at the very bottom of the page with that picture of the 3 men at the top then a paragrah highlighted in yellow then a paragragh below that highlighted in green...

extremely tiny print for the website..that is a red flag....they put out this oh so important info but are hiding who they are? and who are these drs they speak of?? hiding who they are and being vague about these drs...red flags

originally posted by: Kenzo
a reply to: research100

I did not find it...must be very small text .


lewrockwell.com has quite a lot authors



LewRockwell.com authors

originally posted by: research100
...For more information I recommend, RationalWiki who has done a fantastic job of putting all of it together.

Recommending RationalWiki for unbiased trustworthy information after just feeling the need to point out the unreliable nature of a biased rightwing website?

3
RationalWiki

A website that should change its name to "irrationakwiki". It is basically the liberal version of Conservapedia. Rather than spewing bias, fundamentalist christian and ultra conservative views, it instead spews liberal views and has a left-wing bias. However, it is more centre left than far left since it criticises socialism and communism, at least to an extent. The name 'RationalWiki" can also be used to describe fighting bias with bias and looking like a moronic baboon ranting. Basically, RationalWiki is as bad as Conservapedia. Don't use it. It's not as bad as Conservapedia, but it is still biased like all political wikis, news sources (like CNN or Fox News), videos etc.

by Aguero2992 October 27, 2019

Source: Urban Dictionary: RationalWiki

Pretty decent description I'd say. Could use some hint regarding their undying devotion and excessive praise and promotion of the most prominent and effective promoters of pseudoscience, such as these fellas:

Psychology: The Art of selling nonsense/contradictions (Prologue: Stephen Hawking's nonsense)

Psychology: Dawkins&Krauss selling the philosophy and contradiction that nothing is something

Someone promoting themselves by incorporating the word "rational" in either their website or accountname, with the implication that you should take them more seriously because their views are supposedly the (more) rational views, or they are (more) guided or 'ruled' by rationality, rationality is on their side, so to speak (like the youtube accountname responded to below), should probably be viewed with some skepticism anyway (also, talking about contradictions...):

The same counts for those who do the same thing with the word "science":

Or they wear T-shirts like this guy at 1:00:

originally posted by: Kenzo
It`s very different story than what the goverments are telling us about covid-19 ....

What have governments been telling you about covid-19?

I recall a lot of uncertainty and calls to play it safe. Lockdowns that resulted in declines in infections, hospitalizations and deaths only to have these numbers rise after things opened up again. Deaths not so much, after it was realized that ventilators were doing more harm than good.

a reply to: daskakik

But..But...But...

Streets in NYC lined with refrigerated trucks loaded with body-bags of the dead!!

a reply to: TXRabbit

Seems some spots where hit kinda hard in the beginning. That was what caused the alarm but that is how it works.