It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

BREAKING: DNI Declassifies John Brennan Handwritten Notes After Obama Briefing

page: 3
70
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: smurfy

Everybody knows about Brennan's briefing, which was about Russian interference re members of Trump's campaign, and that had been going on for some time...Trump himself had also been briefed before official takeover.



There was more than one Obama briefing, and this DECLASS
proves Obama was briefed on this matter, as verified by Brennan's
handwritten notes.

Read the actual documents, it mentions Guccifer 2.0, and that
verifies that Hillary Clinton's campaign effort to tie the hacking
together with Trump.

No one ever had any proof of that as The DNC refused to
give the server to the FBI.

Either that or the FBI was in on the scam.



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: burntheships




Again, you are cherry picking out quotes that were
commonly used before the DECLASS, and you're skipping
key parts.


The key part is that these allegation were gleaned from Russian intel, not from the Clinton Campaign.


A source familiar with the documents explained that Brennan's handwritten notes were taken after briefing Obama on the matter.

“We’re getting additional insight into Russian activities from [REDACTED],” Brennan notes read. “CITE [summarizing] alleged approved by Hillary Clinton a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service,” Brennan’s notes read.

www.foxnews.com...


That's not what your quote says. It says one of her advisors created a scandal "claiming" interference by Russians. Nowhere does the new information say it came FROM Russians.

Just admit that you're wrong about it being Russian interference and join the rest of us who believe the truth.
edit on 6-10-2020 by HalWesten because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Read the entire document, especially consider the word
"exchange". That references a conversation between
two. Was that Russians talking to Russians?

Also take note of the mention of Guccifer 2.0.
Clearly, as Ratcliff said this is NOT disinformation.

Hillary Clinton approved of framing Trump for
some type of Russian collusion, including trying
to tie him to the hacking.

Robert Mueller in his billion dollar investigation
was never able to prove that. So apparently
the truth washed out in the final report.

Trump was framed by Hillary, and the CIA
and FBI were in on it.

Logical thinking is logical.




edit on 6-10-2020 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: burntheships

The resources needed to execute this entrapment of Donald Trump could not have happened without approval from the Obama-Biden Administration


Rumor has it there are more DECLASS coming.

Also some say indictments.

Are you familiar with this reporter?

twitter.com...



Yes I am. Unlike the fakes at CNN, NYTimes, etc., Journalist Paul Sperry is accurate in what he says about 90% of the time.

Former FBI Asst. Director Andy McCabe was supposed to testify to the Senate Judiciary committee Today, just like former FBI Director James Comey did last week.

But McCabe chickened out due to 2 Republican Senators on the committee mysteriously contracting Covid-19. He doesn't want to testify via ZOOM as others have done, because he believes all testimonies should be in person.

Source: justthenews.com...

It should be noted that the Washington D.C. Grand Jury (mostly Democrats) declined to Indict Andy McCabe last Fall.

Story: www.lawfareblog.com...

That result can be expected from any Grand Jury that's seated in a location that is filled with Democrat citizens. They protect criminals within their party....especially those who worked for President Obama.



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:35 PM
link   
a reply to: HalWesten




It says one of her advisors created a scandal "claiming" interference by Russians. Nowhere does the new information say it came FROM Russians.


Was her advisor [REDACTED]?


“We’re getting additional insight into Russian activities from [REDACTED],” Brennan notes read.




Nowhere does the new information say it came FROM Russians.



"In late July 2016, U.S. intelligence agencies obtained insight into Russian intelligence analysis alleging that U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians' hacking of the Democratic National Committee. The IC does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the extent to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication,” Ratcliffe wrote in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

townhall.com...


Ratcliffe informed the committee last week that the Obama administration obtained Russian intelligence in July 2016 with allegations against Clinton, but cautioned that the intelligence community “does not know the accuracy of this allegation or the text to which the Russian intelligence analysis may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.”

www.foxnews.com...


Newly declassified handwritten notes from former CIA Director John Brennan show that the U.S. intelligence community knew in 2016 that Russian intelligence was actively monitoring, and potentially injecting disinformation into, Clinton’s anti-Trump collusion narrative.

thefederalist.com... eration/



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships




Hillary Clinton approved of framing Trump for
some type of Russian collusion, including trying
to tie him to the hacking.


Allegedly, according to Russian intel sources.



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

But nowhere does that say the intelligence came
directly from a Russian. Can you comprehend that?



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 07:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Here ya go .......

This makes more sense than your ass backwards twisting and total misconceptions ..




posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:10 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

They say timing is everything.

Bring it on!



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Sookiechacha

But nowhere does that say the intelligence came
directly from a Russian. Can you comprehend that?



Former CIA director John Brennan on Tuesday accused current intelligence chief John Ratcliffe of selectively declassifying documents ahead of the November election that benefit President Donald Trump, telling CNN that the decision to release materials gathered by the agency on Russian allegations that Hillary Clinton was planning on "stirring up a scandal" against her Republican rival in 2016 was motivated by politics.

In an interview with CNN's Jake Tapper, Brennan responded to Ratcliffe's recent decision to declassify notes written by the former CIA director in 2016 after he briefed then-President Barack Obama on intelligence related to Russian security service reporting that Clinton approved "a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service."

www.cnn.com...



edit on 6-10-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Oh, so CNN highlights the same old talking points,
skipping over the actual document.

Yeah, John Brennan looks very off and worried tonight,
after he ran to mama to splain himself.

As Ratcliff said, the information was NOT Russian
disinformation. And we already know it is true
as it has been verified in many ways.



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:48 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Shaking my head...

Ratcliff didn't say the info wasn't Russian, he said it wasn't Russian disinformation.



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

So then, you think the information was accurate?
Hillary Clinton planned to frame Donald Trump for
the DNC hacking?



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:52 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Hillary, Barack, Joe, all were in on it.



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 08:57 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships




So then, you think the information was accurate?
Hillary Clinton planned to frame Donald Trump for
the DNC hacking?


I don't think that was the allegation.

...Russian allegations that Hillary Clinton was planning on "stirring up a scandal"


I don't know that stirring up a scandal is necessarily framing Trump for the hack, that the DNC was happy to claim was Russia. But Hillary certainly did claim that Trump was Putin's puppet during the campaign. So, I wouldn't doubt that exposing Trump as possibly working with Putin to use the hacked material isn't a fat stretch. But, even if true, it's not illegal.



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes they were, and Trump says they have it
"all on tape". I wonder what he means?

LOL.

Maybe we shall soon find out.

All of the sudden his DECLASS tweet is being
reported on by the MSM.




edit on 6-10-2020 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha
Hahahaha
When in a hole the first step to get out is to stop digging.
The jig is up.

But, continue as you like.

Lolololololol



posted on Oct, 6 2020 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha

I don't know that stirring up a scandal is necessarily framing Trump for the hack, that the DNC was happy to claim was Russia. But Hillary certainly did claim that Trump was Putin's puppet during the campaign. So, I wouldn't doubt that exposing Trump as possibly working with Putin to use the hacked material isn't a fat stretch. But, even if true, it's not illegal.



You must mean creating a scandal. As we know, Trump did not
collude with Russia, and there was no evidence that was found
that proved ANY American colluded with Russia.

So, it wasn't true. But somewhere in the mix of what
Hillary and Obama and Joe and Brennan, Comey and Clapper
and Yates and so forth did there was a crime.

One person has already plead guilty. Dozens of people
were fired, and the Top Dogs have been found to have
lied, twisted, and fabricated emails and more.

Yes, crimes have been committed!
The American people were lied to and defrauded!

It is well past the time for this to come to light.




top topics



 
70
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join