It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: frogs453
Well if the rangers have made the determination, they clearly have a better picture than anyone of us. Of course nobody I even remember this in a week, and if it has not made it viral than the entire operation could just be a staged production,arrested officer and all.
Sometimes the easiest way to kill a psy op after it had been exposed is to simply expedite the results. Without the typical terrorist media blasting it out 24/7 I just getsuspicious.
-Worldstarcountry
Why do you insist on signing your name after ever post?
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: galaga
Why do you insist on signing your name after ever post?
Just my way of showing that I am proud of every post I make. I've done that since before ATS.
My opinion might not be popular, might not even be right... but I can take pride in the fact that I at least try to think through every single post (even when joking around). My signature reminds me to do that; my name is on the line.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: mwood
a reply to: TexasTruth
He appears to be a "really good guy".
Yet he was assauting a woman.
These two statements don't seem to go together well.
Don't know anything about the case and not saying the cop was in the wrong but unlike too many people I don't automatically side against the police.
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: frogs453
But since we can only punish crimes after the fact (by the nature of crimes...) this seems objectively proper to me.
The investigation could not establish a reasonable grounds for the use of deadly force. He has been charged criminally. Innocent until proven guilty by the jury he will go before.
This was handled textbook.