It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Here you can see clearly via my forensic analysis of this ginsburg’ image ITS NOT a high probability she an original element of the actual photo not hard to figure out what the implications are here chance Ginsburg officiated a wedding on Aug 31 is less than 0.5% imo
originally posted by: FamCore
Anyone who's been paying attention the past few days has seen democrats and those on the left stating that "they will burn down congress" if a new Supreme Court judge is "pushed through before the election".
The narrative is that Ginsburg's own "last words" were that her replacement on the Supreme Court should be nominated by the next president.
For the left, it certainly would make sense to announce Ginsburg's passing closer to the election to stir up more emotion and potential pushback on any Trump nominations.
originally posted by: lakenheath24
So eight other justices had no idea? Or in on it?
Me thinks not.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: FamCore
For a forensic analyzer, he/she sure has poor writing skills. The caption under the picture reads like directions on toys from Chinese manufacturers.
originally posted by: dug88
a reply to: FamCore
I dunno, doesn't really look photoshopped. Is kind of odd the photographer focussed on her instead of the couple though. It's supposed to be their wedding but she's the only thkng clearly in focus.
I'd be willing to go with staged or double rather than doctored photo there. Then again, it is kind of odd the organ's equally as in focus as she is. Either her or the organ should be slightly blurrier.
The picture does seem odd either way.
originally posted by: KansasGirl
a reply to: FamCore
For a forensic analyzer, he/she sure has poor writing skills. The caption under the picture reads like directions on toys from Chinese manufacturers.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Lumenari
Wish I had photoshop to try to look closer, thank you for the analysis.
The other possibility would be that they doctored (or manufactured altogether) the photo, but the date of her death is still accurate. I'd be curious as to the actual original source & publication of the photo in question
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Notoneofyou
It does look photoshopped, but that's not unusual for wedding photos. I believe that RBG was alive on Aug 31.
I'd be curious as to the actual original source & publication of the photo in question