It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: putnam6
It's funny how you can tell who read the whole thing every word and who didn't. It's also ironic how we besmirch the kid having a AR15 on scene but the guy now missing a chunk of his arm had a semi automatic Glock. The words of one of the other "protesters" pretty much said the first victim was trying to get the AR15 away from him after chasing him down, he leaned in while grabbing the gun and thats when he got shot. Everything after that is he has this mob after him,it was totally self defense if they would have just followed him he was going towards the cops and they could have got them to arrest him easily enough.
What I don't get is when the police were so far away I could be wrong but it was like they set up a line and just let the protester's got to town. Have seen that tactic before.
originally posted by: ontogeny55
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: liveandletlive
There were other shooters, but nothing on vid other than 1 guy firing a shot in the air..who knows. He could have multiple wounds from a single bullet though.
multiple wounds from a single bullet.
sounds like the "magic bullet" from 11/22/1963
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: DustDoses
The most hysterical part of your comment is that you’re so cocksure of your position that you casually dismiss the eyewitness who was there and was within a few feet of what happened and present your own opinion as if it’s a settled fact despite your opinion coming from a video dozens of feet even further away from the shooting, and even then it’s a camera recording.
That’s some incredible mental gymnastics.
originally posted by: DustDoses
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: DustDoses
The most hysterical part of your comment is that you’re so cocksure of your position that you casually dismiss the eyewitness who was there and was within a few feet of what happened and present your own opinion as if it’s a settled fact despite your opinion coming from a video dozens of feet even further away from the shooting, and even then it’s a camera recording.
That’s some incredible mental gymnastics.
Where does the eyewitness say Rosenbaum made contact with the weapon?
He says he reached for it.
On video he is seen three feet away.
It sure what you're getting at
originally posted by: DustDoses
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: DustDoses
The most hysterical part of your comment is that you’re so cocksure of your position that you casually dismiss the eyewitness who was there and was within a few feet of what happened and present your own opinion as if it’s a settled fact despite your opinion coming from a video dozens of feet even further away from the shooting, and even then it’s a camera recording.
That’s some incredible mental gymnastics.
Where does the eyewitness say Rosenbaum made contact with the weapon?
He says he reached for it.
On video he is seen three feet away.
It sure what you're getting at
It sure what you're getting at
it is not a well known fact that 5.56 mm rounds tumble , or what is commonly called keyhole.
it is a well known fact that some ar/m16 rounds tumble when they hit and can cause more than one wound and tissue damage.
5.56 NATO SBS® TUI™ - 62Gr Rifle Ammo/Bulk Ammo
by Ft Scott Munitions
$ 25.14 USD
Amazing Accuracy and Terminal Performance
Solid Brass Spun (SBS™) bullet, Non-lead
Multi-Patented Tumble Upon Impact™
Match grade ammunition
Fort Scott Munitions
223 Rem SCS® TUI® - 55Gr Rifle Ammo/Bulk Ammo
by Ft. Scott Munitions
$ 24.67 USD
Outstanding Accuracy and Terminal Performance
Non-lead, solid copper spun (SCS®) bullet
Multi-Patented, Tumble Upon Impact™ design
Match grade ammunition
223 Rem SCS® TUI® - 55Gr Rifle
This profile is the M855 5.56mm NATO cartridge, with a 62gr steel core FMJ boat tailed bullet @ 3035 f/s. This is a classic fragmenting rifle bullet profile. Penetration is acceptable at 34cm (13.4"). Note the long narrow neck of about 9 cm (4") before the bullet tumbles and fragments. (The length of the neck can vary from 9 cm to about 20 cm depending on impact velocity (one of the reasons for its erratic performance). The original M193 55gr round produces a similar profile but it has a longer neck, and slightly smaller temporary and permanent cavities. Both of these bullets fracture violently at the cannelure at velocities above about 2700 f/s. Below that velocity the bullets may break into several large pieces or simply tumble without producing the extensive permanent cavity, much like the 7.62 mm M80 ball round.
Terminal Ballistics
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: DustDoses
It sure what you're getting at
That’s usually how it goes when one makes up one’s mind on a conclusion and then tries to shoehorn events to fit the conclusion one has already decided is correct.
That said, can you explain for the class how you came up with such precise and definitive distance measurements?
originally posted by: DustDoses
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: DustDoses
It sure what you're getting at
That’s usually how it goes when one makes up one’s mind on a conclusion and then tries to shoehorn events to fit the conclusion one has already decided is correct.
That said, can you explain for the class how you came up with such precise and definitive distance measurements?
Because not touching means he shot someone who was running towards him reaching.
You can't do that.
If you were the waterboy at a marathon, you couldn't shoot a runner in the head because you had a reason to believe they were going to murder you.
originally posted by: ontogeny55
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
i know what internal ballistics is
i know what transitional ballistics is
i know what external ballistics is
i know what downrange transitional ballistics from supersonic to sub sonic is
i know what terminal ballistics is