Rising autism + decreasing virility + pandemic = Engineering a new social structure for the NWO

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

There's nobody in charge. No cabal other than capitalists who have sought to increase their profits at any expense. Poisoning the air, raping the wilderness, polluting the oceans and turning the whole environment into a crap heap.

I sincerely, sincerely hope that is the case - because if that is the case, then at some point we will all reach an event horizon of awareness of just how toxic & destructive an effect those who behave in such manner are having on the human race & we'll wake the hell up & fight for reforms en masse. But what is the Bilderberger group other than a cabal which makes plans for the direction of humanity?

Primarily because of beliefs tied to my spiritual outlook (which you doubtless will not agree with, as is your prerogative), I hold that there are forces at work in the world which are quite deliberate in what they are doing. Perhaps it is all extremely subtle, and not coordinated at a human level - but there is a hand of coordination in all the malevolence which is being unfurled against the human race. It's getting worse precisely because our technology is advancing at hyper pace, and the temptations of man will become ever more devastating should they be heeded. But again, Bilderberg. Fabian Society. Club of Rome. Etc, etc..

Those in this thread who are screaming that there is no coordination, that there is no deliberate action against the sanctity of human life are utterly deluded, it is not the other way around, I assure you. Though doubtless you & others who look the other way will not believe that to be the case no matter what anyone else says - until you, or your children, or your children's children, wake up one day in a gulag, with no due process available to get you/them out, because the rights of mankind have been chipped away bit by bit in the preceding decades, precisely because there is a coordinated effort to alter the fabric of society, taking money & power away from the masses, counting on their own sublime wisdom to choose/ dictate a path for humanity.

Corporate power is being concentrated in fewer & fewer hands as the years go by. Corporations are arguably more powerful than governments at this stage. And yet you believe that there is no plan. There's always a plan - that's how capitalism is successful, because there are plans to take wealth & control away from others to give it to oneself..

a reply to: Phage

So you're tying organic food sales to autism incidence? First time I've heard that one lol. But I'd be interested in reading the evidence if you have any?

On the cancer topic I do (bearing in mind the graph you just posted I'm shocked you needed to ask!).

This is from Cancer Research UK:

World age-standardised (AS) incidence rates for cancers in children (girls and boys combined) increased by 15% in the UK between 1993-1995 and 2015-2017.[1-4] The increase was of a similar size in girls and boys.

Over the last decade in the UK (between 2005-2007 and 2015-2017), AS incidence rates for cancers in children (girls and boys combined) increased by 10%.[1-4] In girls AS incidence rates increased by 12% and in boys rates increased by 8%.

Link - www.cancerresearchuk.org...-Two

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee
Reclassification and awareness is more likely the reason for an increase in Autism statistics.

I seriously doubt that. People say similar things about cancer "oh, cancer is only more common now because people live longer".

But that doesn't explain why cancer is on the rise in younger people does it?

The modern diet is the most likely culprit imo.

The OP could be right though, maybe it is vaccines that have increased the incidence of autism. Who really knows for sure?

What i do know for a fact, is that the predicament we're in as a race is a consequence of allowing money to come before anything else. And until that changes, nothing much else is going to change.

Do you have an autistic child?

There is a specific Autism that affects what appears to be a normal developing child around the age of 3 — that coincides with vaccinations.

Don’t use coincidence of timing — to claim false fact.

So unimmunized children don't have that specific type of autism as well? Surely few exceptions are required to disprove the rule.

Perhaps the statistics of how many children who have been immunized and do not have autism can be used as a scale.

My kid is 54 — she was diagnosed ADD in 1975.

That is how long I have been reading and researching both ADD & Autism — from legitimate sources.

I’m going to stick with what I’ve learned.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee
Reclassification and awareness is more likely the reason for an increase in Autism statistics.

I seriously doubt that. People say similar things about cancer "oh, cancer is only more common now because people live longer".

But that doesn't explain why cancer is on the rise in younger people does it?

The modern diet is the most likely culprit imo.

The OP could be right though, maybe it is vaccines that have increased the incidence of autism. Who really knows for sure?

What i do know for a fact, is that the predicament we're in as a race is a consequence of allowing money to come before anything else. And until that changes, nothing much else is going to change.

Do you have an autistic child?

There is a specific Autism that affects what appears to be a normal developing child around the age of 3 — that coincides with vaccinations.

Don’t use coincidence of timing — to claim false fact.

I don't believe i said that vaccines weren't the cause of autism did i? What i actually said was that the OP could be right. But i don't know for sure if he is or not. And neither do you.

a reply to: jamespond

So you're tying organic food sales to autism incidence? First time I've heard that one lol. But I'd be interested in reading the evidence if you have any?

I think he's making the point that correlation does not equal causation, and he's done a fine job of it. Thing is, other data could be added to the graph which would show great measures of correlation indicative but not definitive, that there is a link between the sorts of issues I highlighted in the OP. I will make an effort to pad out the thread with data supporting my thoughts tomorrow.

a reply to: jamespond

So you're tying organic food sales to autism incidence?

No. Maybe you should check your O rings.


Your source:

These trends include non-malignant brain, other central nervous system and intracranial tumours because they account for a relatively high proportion of cases in this age group. However trends for these tumours are unreliable pre-2000s, and largely reflect improved data collection rather than true increased incidence. Percentage increases since the late 1970s and early 1990s are very slightly smaller if these tumours are excluded.

Non-malignant = cancer?

a reply to: jamespond

I love the definition Annee has provided, of a 'false fact'. I do wonder how such a thing could legitimately exist?

originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
a reply to: jamespond

So you're tying organic food sales to autism incidence? First time I've heard that one lol. But I'd be interested in reading the evidence if you have any?

I think he's making the point that correlation does not equal causation, and he's done a fine job of it. Thing is, other data could be added to the graph which would show great measures of correlation indicative but not definitive, that there is a link between the sorts of issues I highlighted in the OP. I will make an effort to pad out the thread with data supporting my thoughts tomorrow.

I get it, but why's he making that point to me. Did i say that vaccines = autism? I must of missed that part of my post.

Is OP talking about the entire world or a specific country? If that specific country is America i would have made an uneducated guess that the cause would be the freaking cocktail of drugs the American people throw into their face every single day, even pregnant people. In Sweden we had a drug (talidomid) in the 60:s that caused birth defect resulting in cognitive impairment (one was autism) of the children or physical disfigurement, the parents sued the state & won & got compensated. Now alot of prescribed drugs have a warning that preggers should be causious or contact their doctors to see if that specific drug is okay to use during pregnancy

Talking with american friends about this, i was surprised how many took several different prescribed drugs daily, none said that they did not take any prescribed drugs

So, who knows, when so many people in the world, especially America (seemingly) are so obsessed with drugs, maybe there is one or many drugs out there like talidomid that also causing the autism

www.nytimes.com...
www.lakemedelsvarlden.se... (swedish article, use google translate or another flavour of your choice)


Who knows, autism can probably have 4403493303 billion different causes, who will figure which one of it it is?

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: jamespond

So you're tying organic food sales to autism incidence?

No. Maybe you should check your O rings.


Your source:

These trends include non-malignant brain, other central nervous system and intracranial tumours because they account for a relatively high proportion of cases in this age group. However trends for these tumours are unreliable pre-2000s, and largely reflect improved data collection rather than true increased incidence. Percentage increases since the late 1970s and early 1990s are very slightly smaller if these tumours are excluded.

Non-malignant = cancer?

It seems as if not everyone agrees with you mate

Although most benign tumors are not life-threatening, many types of benign tumors have the potential to become cancerous (malignant) through a process known as tumor progression.[6] For this reason and other possible negative health effects, some benign tumors are removed by surgery.[7]

en.m.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: jamespond

This does not change the fact that the statistics you quote include non-cancerous (benign) tumors.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

I can assure you Fly, I am and have not been ''looking the other way''.

I agree with much of your reply and find it much like my own observations.

And certainly there are forces at work in the world though to my mind, not any '' otherworldly'' forces that you might have been hinting at.

To me it is an outgrowth of capitalism, me first and the rest behind if they can keep up kind of thing. Capitalism based on an unquestioned, never ending supply of resources. A philosophy based on '' Dominionism''

So dig as we might into the Fabians and the WTO and the Bilderberts and all the rest, one thing that they all have in common is their capitalist structure and faith. Expose one and take it out and guess what, another will pop up in it's place. Tis capitalism that poisons us more than the players who play it for their own advantage.

It's wee the people who need to rewrite how much profit they are able to accumulate. We the people. Not just the people of the US but the people of the world. It's global control needs to be broken.

This is why I do not like the Democrat Party much. Because they are not socialist or Marxist because for the majority of those liberals, they all support capitalism. What they really are to the best of my understanding is ''neo ilberal'', those people who try to alter the social culture in such a way as to allow more and wider consumption all of which flows straight to the top. And being '' neo-liberal'' does not make them socialists but instead makes them conservatives who want to keep the old system but just augment it enough to keep their own fortunes flowing.

a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

Autism is nothing to joke about. Not even a little.

The oddest thing about it is the degree of variation it exhibits in those afflicted with it.

It can be severe, such that the person affected (typically young boys) are simply beyond reach - they truly live in their own world. Or it can be mild, so that it is noticeable to varying degrees by those closest to them, but they are relatively "normal" to those outside the family unit.

As to why the number of cases per 100 children born has literally exploded, it's still unknown.

But it is a real phenomenon. It's not fantasy.

I know more than the average person about it because my son is on the Autism spectrum. He's very high functioning and has alway been a joy to those lucky enough to know him.

He's an amazing person. Smart, incredibly loving & empathetic towards others, and he has a good understanding of his condition and the things he needs to do to help himself.

He's a far better person than I am. I'm just blessed to have him in my life.

With all that said, does he, I and the rest of the family wish he was a typical child instead?

Yes - every day.

Every single day.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: jamespond

This does not change the fact that the statistics you quote include non-cancerous (benign) tumors.

That can also be life threatening

a reply to: jamespond

Sure. But they are not cancer.

If you are suggesting environmental causes, perhaps you might start with cancers which are known to have environmental causes.

All cancers are not the same.

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee
Reclassification and awareness is more likely the reason for an increase in Autism statistics.

I seriously doubt that. People say similar things about cancer "oh, cancer is only more common now because people live longer".

But that doesn't explain why cancer is on the rise in younger people does it?

The modern diet is the most likely culprit imo.

The OP could be right though, maybe it is vaccines that have increased the incidence of autism. Who really knows for sure?

What i do know for a fact, is that the predicament we're in as a race is a consequence of allowing money to come before anything else. And until that changes, nothing much else is going to change.

Do you have an autistic child?

There is a specific Autism that affects what appears to be a normal developing child around the age of 3 — that coincides with vaccinations.

Don’t use coincidence of timing — to claim false fact.

I don't believe i said that vaccines weren't the cause of autism did i? What i actually said was that the OP could be right. But i don't know for sure if he is or not. And neither do you.

Research says vaccinations are not the cause of Autism.

I apologize if you feel I am making this a personal attack on you. I’m not.

However, I am personally involved and have followed research for 40+ years.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: jamespond

Sure. But they are not cancer.

If you are suggesting environmental causes, perhaps you might start with cancers which are known to have environmental causes.

All cancers are not the same.

I never said all cancers were the same. I was generalising when i said cancer is increasing in kids.

Whether it's environmental factors, diet factors or whatever else, is irrelevant.

Air pollution, pesticides sprayed on the food we eat, the way the animals we eat are raised, are all contributing factors. Not to mention all the processed foods people eat!

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee
Reclassification and awareness is more likely the reason for an increase in Autism statistics.

I seriously doubt that. People say similar things about cancer "oh, cancer is only more common now because people live longer".

But that doesn't explain why cancer is on the rise in younger people does it?

The modern diet is the most likely culprit imo.

The OP could be right though, maybe it is vaccines that have increased the incidence of autism. Who really knows for sure?

What i do know for a fact, is that the predicament we're in as a race is a consequence of allowing money to come before anything else. And until that changes, nothing much else is going to change.

Do you have an autistic child?

There is a specific Autism that affects what appears to be a normal developing child around the age of 3 — that coincides with vaccinations.

Don’t use coincidence of timing — to claim false fact.

I don't believe i said that vaccines weren't the cause of autism did i? What i actually said was that the OP could be right. But i don't know for sure if he is or not. And neither do you.

Research says vaccinations are not the cause of Autism.

I apologize if you feel I am making this a personal attack on you. I’m not.

However, I am personally involved and have followed research for 40+ years.

No worries, I don't get upset very easily.

I admire you for putting the effort in actually.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: jamespond

originally posted by: Annee
Reclassification and awareness is more likely the reason for an increase in Autism statistics.

I seriously doubt that. People say similar things about cancer "oh, cancer is only more common now because people live longer".

But that doesn't explain why cancer is on the rise in younger people does it?

The modern diet is the most likely culprit imo.

The OP could be right though, maybe it is vaccines that have increased the incidence of autism. Who really knows for sure?

What i do know for a fact, is that the predicament we're in as a race is a consequence of allowing money to come before anything else. And until that changes, nothing much else is going to change.

Do you have an autistic child?

There is a specific Autism that affects what appears to be a normal developing child around the age of 3 — that coincides with vaccinations.

Don’t use coincidence of timing — to claim false fact.

I don't believe i said that vaccines weren't the cause of autism did i? What i actually said was that the OP could be right. But i don't know for sure if he is or not. And neither do you.

Research says vaccinations are not the cause of Autism.

I apologize if you feel I am making this a personal attack on you. I’m not.

However, I am personally involved and have followed research for 40+ years.

Everything seems to go wrong when frequencies from Radar /cells /mobiles come in from what i have read , i have a friend with 2 teenage Autistic kids who are a handful

www.bitchute.com... 43 minutes in should be interesting ?

originally posted by: Riffrafter
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment

With all that said, does he, I and the rest of the family wish he was a typical child instead?

Yes - every day.

Every single day.

Thank you for that honesty. I have severe adhd and some autistic traits (adhd is debated to maybe be part of the same spectrum as it has many overlaps, but I don't know much about that) and I really tire of people dismissing the difficulties with statements from the peanut gallery like "everyone has adhd issues" and those with very mild adhd screaming "it's my superpower." I know where I'd like to stick their superpower, lol. Anyhow, I'd love to be normal as this is mighty tiring. To my mind the numbers are only rising due to many children in the past being undiagnosed. We don't know the true stats. I wasn't diagnosed until 50 and that's half a century wasted.