Why Historically Known cultures hid information about the Ice Age

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: bloodymarvelous





I.........

edit on 25-6-2021 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)

a reply to: Harte


Ack , Ack ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,OK , Debunk this Harte !







" This astonishing site simply does not mesh with the current theory of human presence in the Americas. The current view has no explanation for the dates suggested at the site, because incredibly, they could push back the timeline of human existence in the Americas, not just thousands, but potentially hundreds of thousands of years. "


Humans in the America 200,000 Years Ago > ? .Hmm..

a reply to: Spider879
Cold nations the most peaceful?! Euro history is pretty much just war after war.

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Harte


Ack , Ack ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,OK , Debunk this Harte !

" This astonishing site simply does not mesh with the current theory of human presence in the Americas. The current view has no explanation for the dates suggested at the site, because incredibly, they could push back the timeline of human existence in the Americas, not just thousands, but potentially hundreds of thousands of years. "


Humans in the America 200,000 Years Ago > ? .Hmm..

This claim was debunked decades ago.
You can read about it here.

Any more questions?

Harte

a reply to: Harte





" The dating of the site is still controversial as is [sic] the artifactual constituents. This lecture will introduce the Calico site and address two controversies. It is up to the audience to draw their own conclusions. "



That does Not Sound like it was Difinitively Debunked at All ..............


Still Waiting..............Ack , Ack ......

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Harte





" The dating of the site is still controversial as is [sic] the artifactual constituents. This lecture will introduce the Calico site and address two controversies. It is up to the audience to draw their own conclusions. "



That does Not Sound like it was Difinitively Debunked at All ..............


Still Waiting..............Ack , Ack ......

Guess you didn't want to read it, since you went with a quote from a radio station giving a story about the site.
The claim has been dead for 50 years.

Harte

a reply to: Harte


Says You .

a reply to: Zanti Misfit
The link explains it. Up to you to read it and not cherry pick out of context quotes.
I mean, it WAS you that asked for this.

Harte

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Harte

...

That does Not Sound like it was Difinitively Debunked at All ..............

Can you explain what's not definitive about:

... high-energy events are more than capable of causing rocks to fracture in ways that mimic simple stone artifacts. (thesubversivearchaeologist.net...)

a reply to: Hooke



" Can you explain what's not definitive about: "


Just a Theory , Not a Scientific Fact . It's Standard Practice for the Scientific Establishment to Disregard Any Tangable Independent Evidence that is Contrary to their Established Paradigm . In regards to Man's History on this Planet , the Same Reaction is put Forth .


‘There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio , Than are dreamt of in your philosophy .’



" The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing . "

Socrates





WS

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: Hooke



" Can you explain what's not definitive about: "


Just a Theory , Not a Scientific Fact . It's Standard Practice for the Scientific Establishment to Disregard Any Tangable Independent Evidence that is Contrary to their Established Paradigm . In regards to Man's History on this Planet , the Same Reaction is put Forth .

We note, however, that you treat the 50 year old claim as "fact." Rocks break on their own. Happens a lot in an alluvial fan. Maybe one day you'll read the article, but I doubt it. You'd rather remain ignorant - makes the world a lot more magical.

Harte

a reply to: Harte

its always the same pattern,

ignoring inconvenient facts for a fantasy (much easier).
attack the scholars ad hominem .
draw false conclusions to 'scientists in general .
repeat.

the fringe feeds itself on its own.

one could think that lies wont harm anyone, but the Big Lie is a known propaganda technique.