Do YouTube Voting Buttons Show Us Anything

I have noticed that with both candidates their popularity show a very different picture when one looks at the voting buttons, and I will not even go into the remarks that also show the same trends as the votes. With Trump typically he has a large number of overall votes with a huge number of thumbs up compared to thumbs down, but with Biden it is a different story. His show a very low overall count with typically more thumbs down then thumbs up.

Below are two speeches today that happened about the same time, so you all tell me the picture they tell, and if it actually means anything.


Biden's speech today


Trump's speech today


Update for Biden since Trump was actually a little earlier than Biden's so here are new numbers for Biden with more minutes than Trump.

a reply to: Xtrozero

they look identical to me, is that the point?

originally posted by: UpIsNowDown

they look identical to me, is that the point?

I fixed it, the posting was screwed up

That is because trump has more people going to vote for him. They won't openly admit it because they fear for their jobs and livelihood. The comments on yahoo ha e been taken away because in the previous weeks they were overwhelmingly in favor of trump.

a reply to: Xtrozero

It means Biden and whoever supports him is going to be really disappointed in November.

originally posted by: Themaskedbeast
That is because trump has more people going to vote for him. They won't openly admit it because they fear for their jobs and livelihood. The comments on yahoo ha e been taken away because in the previous weeks they were overwhelmingly in favor of trump.

I noticed they dropped comments on one of Biden's speeches that were just roasting the crap out of him...like 50 to 1.

I find this interesting in the right and moderate left have basically been the silent majority with the big noise makers being the alt left who one would think would be pushing all these agendas to include a huge positive Biden turnout in not only YouTube votes, but positive comments and we are not seeing it.

The big question is what picture does that really show everyone outside the narrative that Biden is leading. Are people even going to vote for the man even while hating Trump?

a reply to: Xtrozero

Normal, regular, hard-working blue-collar democrats would have probably had voted for Biden if it weren't for the Covid shut-downs. It's been predominantly democrat state leadership that has been pushing for it and it's left a bad taste in people's mouths.

The blue-collar working democrats aren't working right now.

This has hurt them and as much as people try to blame Trump, the main fault lies with the individual states and their leadership.

We all see the polls which are basically meaningless.

I have to wonder about the internal polls that show the real numbers before they sanitize the data for our "protection".

a reply to: Xtrozero

Who's channel is it?

Channel biases aside (being that usually people will only watch content they agree with) it's an indicator of how people actually feel, as opposed to the narrative that media like to represent, that THEIR opinion is the one dominant in society - this way, a handful of unelected writers get to tell society how they feel, and they, apparently, speak for everyone.


The BBC is a good example. Time and time and time again he public is COMPLETELY against the narrative that they spin, and its allowed to go, unquestioned, as though it's a self evident truth....

The real question is why?

Ths answer is simple.
Satan is a liar, it's his world, his system, he has his people in power set up, they are of their father- who was a liar from the beginning. It's his narrative we see pushed. That's why it's always so insidious.

The BBC for example will preen on morals and being impartial and just, whilst defending a prolific pedophile (Saville) and then just saying "oops"....

originally posted by: smurfy

Who's channel is it?

Yahoo Finance has about the same split, but good question I just clicked on whatever was on top.

originally posted by: Joneselius
Channel biases aside (being that usually people will only watch content they agree with) it's an indicator of how people actually feel, as opposed to the narrative that media like to represent, that THEIR opinion is the one dominant in society - this way, a handful of unelected writers get to tell society how they feel, and they, apparently, speak for everyone.


The BBC is a good example. Time and time and time again he public is COMPLETELY against the narrative that they spin, and its allowed to go, unquestioned, as though it's a self evident truth....

The real question is why?

Ths answer is simple.
Satan is a liar, it's his world, his system, he has his people in power set up, they are of their father- who was a liar from the beginning. It's his narrative we see pushed. That's why it's always so insidious.

The BBC for example will preen on morals and being impartial and just, whilst defending a prolific pedophile (Saville) and then just saying "oops"....

Here is current yahoo finance of the same events

Biden


Trump

a reply to: Xtrozero

So they're hated about the same, but biden's liked a whole lot less is what I get from that.

Yes, I remember in 2016 comparing Hillary and Trump youtube numbers, Hillary was also in the gutter. It appears Biden youtube numbers are much more lower than Hillary. That should speak volumes.

originally posted by: CraftyArrow
Yes, I remember in 2016 comparing Hillary and Trump youtube numbers, Hillary was also in the gutter. It appears Biden youtube numbers are much more lower than Hillary. That should speak volumes.

I think what bothers me most about Biden's numbers is the extremely low over all count. He typically has 2x thumbs down and Trump typically has 2x+ thumbs up, but I think the big picture is Biden's extreme low turnout numbers.

When you go back to May it is a different story...Biden was getting good numbers overall, but now people don't want to watch him, and there is a good reason for that...His speech is cringy even 2 sentences into it. Who would want to watch that...

a reply to: Xtrozero

Those metrics are just as accurate as twitter polls. imo

It's just a small subset that really cares about those votes.
I don't have an account with youtube so I can't vote. So I don't know.

I mean this could just mean that trump supporters care more about watching speeches live or soon after and nothing more.

What do those numbers look like days or weeks later?

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Xtrozero

Those metrics are just as accurate as twitter polls. imo

It's just a small subset that really cares about those votes.
I don't have an account with youtube so I can't vote. So I don't know.

I mean this could just mean that trump supporters care more about watching speeches live or soon after and nothing more.

What do those numbers look like days or weeks later?

Kind of why I made the post...who knows... but the left seems to be more into social networking AND much more energetic with protesting, emotional standoffs, got a lot to say etc. I would think that would bleed over into YouTube etc, but Trump is winning those numbers hands down no matter how you look at it.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: smurfy

Who's channel is it?

Yahoo Finance has about the same split, but good question I just clicked on whatever was on top.

I don't watch Yahoo Finance...Donald.
I do watch a lot of stuff, it's giving me eyes under my bags, I look at a lot of beautiful stuff, with big words and, and nice pictures of my hair..the best in the world, and pillar graphs you wouldn't believe...........Oh! wrong pillar graph, no? wrong subject...WTF am I talking about, Oh yeh! I was talking to some guys In Mar-a-Lago about Iran attacking the Saudis oily line...next week, before it happens...shiite I'm not supposed to say that, who give me this stuff..your'e fired.

Clicking on, "what was on top" is another fecking universe for me...and it 'aint no same split at all..

originally posted by: UpIsNowDown
a reply to: Xtrozero

they look identical to me, is that the point?

Yeah numbers are hard

The point is that trump has more views and a better like ratio( more thumbs up than thumbs down)

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Xtrozero

Normal, regular, hard-working blue-collar democrats would have probably had voted for Biden if it weren't for the Covid shut-downs. It's been predominantly democrat state leadership that has been pushing for it and it's left a bad taste in people's mouths.

The blue-collar working democrats aren't working right now.

This has hurt them and as much as people try to blame Trump, the main fault lies with the individual states and their leadership.

We all see the polls which are basically meaningless.

I have to wonder about the internal polls that show the real numbers before they sanitize the data for our "protection".

Jeez I really didn't you were so far into the bullshiite DB....it behoves me to give you a star for that...just kidding!

a reply to: smurfy

Apologies.

I guess I should have said, "Orange Man Bad" and soiled my pants.