originally posted by: mirageman
When you are financially locked into the UFOtainment market as Dolan is. You are forced to perpetuate UFO mythology. You don't solve any case, you
preserve it. You leave out inconvenient facts to create mystery and you conclude that it was very likely aliens....
That may explain a lot. Dolan goes ‘full Hoagland”. Never go “full Hoagland”.
UFOs IN SPACE. What's Going on Up There? Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure.
Streamed live on Apr 2, 2019 50,000 views
How do Dolan's claims about moon alien evidence get reconciled with this testimony:
Edgar Mitchell to UFO convention, at time 10:35 www.youtube.com...
“I have had no first-hand experience even in the
astronaut program, saw nothing on the moon -- no villages no structures etc, like have been claimed, and have had no UFO experiences myself …except
for the fact of meeting all these fine research people, …"
Gordon Cooper didn't hide any NASA space secrets, and on this Russian interview about 60 min in, he describes how he looked over every inch of the
Apollo film and saw no sign of any alien activity. www.youtube.com...
Fair quote of me on astronaut ufos
DOLAN FALLS FOR A FAKE ‘MOON UFO’ STORY
Dolan transcript 16:02: “ so back in 2005 all right Buzz Aldrin made this crazy statement that the crew of the Apollo 11 mission had seen a UFO on
their way to the moon. the next day or the day after that I don't even think it was Buzz I think he had like spokespeople saying oh no these words
were taken out of context. Buzz Aldrin did not say such thing and what he actually said I just because if you do a search on Buzz Aldrin UFO Moon
today alright you'll get like every single search result is the same the headline there like Washington Post and all the others know Buzz Aldrin
didn't see a UFO on the way to the moon they're all like in unison and they often use the same language right so they're obviously yeah they take
their up marching orders they get … “
REALITY CHECK” The Apollo-11 mid-flight UFO story is a classic that requires a lot of technical context to properly assess, here's my stab at it ==
and critical comments are welcome: www.jamesoberg.com...
DOLAN FALLS FOR A FAKE WHISTLEBLOWER
Dolan transcript 27:45 -- "Johnston is a very interesting guy he's out on this lecture circuit every now and then if you get to meet Ken. … He was
manager of data and photo control at NASA, he was trained as an astronaut, there are pictures of him in his NASA spacesuits which we have seen , and
it's very interesting that ken is willing to go on the record to say this. This is him being interviewed on one of the documentaries I assume this
aired on the History Channel and he just talked about the Apollo 11 moon landing and said that you know we were monitored by extraterrestrials during
those Apollo missions and he was very very upfront about he says while Neil and Buzz were on the lunar surface Neil switched to the medical Channel
and spoke directly to the chief medical officer saying they're here they're parked on the side of the crater and they're watching us. I'll just
mention once again I've mentioned this many times, Timothy Good [the UK British UFO ] has written about this. He had his own totally separate source
for this exact same story .”
REALITY CHECK: To judge Johnston's stories you need to calibrate his checkable claims. They all fail that test. He was never manager of ANY Apollo
office, he was an electrical technician [with a HS diploma] who worked on lunar module test articles [he wore a spacesuit to test getting into and out
of the LM hatch] who was laid off BEFORE the moon landing, was never an 'astronaut' [the famous photo of him helmetless, smiling in the Apollo
spacesuit, is a photoshop from the original official portrait of Mike Collins], he was never a pilot of any kind for NASA [he was a Navy flight school
dropout], he never had a PhD... lots of other imaginary claims.
Evidence: why I think it’s imprudent to believe such claims without thorough investigation
DOLAN FALLS FOR A BOGUS MYSTERY:
Dolan makes a deep secret mystery about a well-documented, common phenomenon associated with Apollo missions, the visibility of booster components
during the outbound leg as they drift along within a few hundred miles of the astronauts.
[video 33:23] This is a alleged transcript of Apollo 12, I don't know how one could ever confirm this unless you get into classified transcripts, I
suppose, but this came through a researcher named Don Ratsch, and I don't know what he's up to these days but I know that he was a very active
investigator researcher in the 80's and 90's and his specialty was to collect film footage from NASA space flight. So this is kind of what Jeff
Challender did in the 90s and 2000's. Well Don Ratsch was doing this little earlier, and he talked about how in 1997 a friend of his arranged for him
to meet with someone who said he had worked for NASA during the Apollo space missions. This man requested anonymity, that's not surprising, it is
pretty typical, but this is what he told Don Ratsch. During the Apollo missions he was one of the people who sat in front of the consoles monitoring
information and he wasn't exactly sure which mission but he thinks it was Apollo 12 … what he believes is he remembers is that one evening during
one of the flights things were slow there were not a lot of people around and so he turned into the transmissions being broadcast from the spacecraft
on the air-to-ground ground-to-air communication system. They were very [?Monday?] and he said until about 8:30 p.m. when this is what he heard:
Apollo: “we have company.” Say again? “I say we have company.” A little bit of silence, and then Houston emphatically “You were told not to
make transmissions such as that, put it on the flight recorder and we'll discuss it when you get back” So that's what Ratsch was told.
FACT CHECK: Apollo-12’s discussion of a sighting out the window on the way to the moon has been known about [and misinterpreted about in the UFO
literature] since the actual event in November 1969. It is discussed in detail at www.jamesoberg.com...
Here are the actual comments:
Elapsed time 034:50:49, Pete Conrad: We think we have the S-IVB in sight. We've - had a - an object which is in the same place all the time and
appears to be tumbling. We've had it ever since yesterday, and it just seems to be tagging along with us, so I guess that's the S-IVB
….. [an hour later]
036:12:07 Carr: Roger, Pete. That thing you saw off the hatch, at a roll of 35 degrees, we figured there's probably three possible answers. Number 1:
it could be the S-IVB, or possibly a SLA panel, or it could be the backup crew flying trail on you. •
036:12:24 Conrad: Roger. Actually we have two objects out there. One's not anywhere near as bright as the other, so I think the real bright one's the
S-IVB and the other one's probably a SLA panel. They're about 20 degrees apart. And as far as the backup crew goes, tell them we'll meet them on the
back side of the moon.
[15 minutes later after long discussion on candidate explanations] ]
036:27:33 [continued next post]
edit on 31-7-2020 by JimOberg because: typo