a reply to: belkide
Just a couple of points.
1) Women are valuable. Killing something valuable is a waste, that's why women can easily have 'balls of steel' - they know they're valuable and
desired, so men won't beat them up like they would beat up men that break the rules. A man walking in a dangerous area alone at night will be beaten
up. A woman won't - at most, she will be violated sexually (we can of course try to have a rational debate as to which is worse, being beaten up and
permanently injured or the other thing, but we all know emotions will heat up so rationality will instantly vanish)
2) Anyone saying that 'if men had to blah', don't take into account that no one cares what men do, because men are expendable, women are valuable,
cherished invidiuals with lots of sexual power. It's not 'weakness' in men to be aroused by the woman body and face, it's just biological, automatic
reaction. This is why, to an extent, and from a certain perspective, 'covering up women' makes SENSE, and a faithful woman would gladly do that for
her husband/loved one, so their body is meant ONLY for his eyes.
We can't even imagine that in the west, where popstars pop out their boobies 'accidentally', and perform in as slutty outfits as they think they can
get away with and try to constantly push the edge with striptease and sexual gyrations with vile lyrics and whatnot. Don't need to look further than
the infamous 'WAP' crap.
If a men didn't wear a veil - and as I mentioned, it's not done PURELY because of oppression, there IS a sort of logic behind it, although it, OF
COURSE goes against human rights to punish women not conforming to this rule - no one would care, because men are not desired, a man's body is
'utilitarian', sperm is cheap and eggs are expensive, etc.
If a woman ever has to pay for sperm/díck/man, that woman is either a fool or has been cheated, when every woman would have hundreds of millions of
men lining up if she offered herself for free, but for men, not even crickets would be interested. Man's sexuality has no value, as sperm is
So it's not about some 'sacred brotherhood' that becomes unfair sexism and inequality, it's EXACTLY because women are so valuable that people care
But let's say people did care, and a man would break the rule - they wouldn't just throw acid in his face, they would violently and brutally murder or
at least beat up that man completely and utterly. Men receive the punches, kicks, fists and boots of this world, together with bullets and missiles,
while women are protected and saved.
Think about this perspective before you write more thoughtless 'you go girl, balls of steel' or 'weak men' or 'if MEN were required to do