It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: igloo
a reply to: LSU2018
Made me laugh! Same with myself and family and we have worked around people all through this. None of us have heard of anyone who got it either.
I am starting to see a division in society between those who had to keep working being chilled and back to normal while those privileged enough to get a government sponsored holiday to stay home and absorb mainstream media being uptight and terrified.
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: BoscoMoney
I should have clarified that. If a store has a sign that says that you must wear a shirt, shoes and now a mask, I don't have a problem with it. If it becomes mandatory everywhere while shopping I still don't have a problem with it.
Essential workers take enough crap from the public as it is. If me wearing a mask can avoid them losing weeks of work or hospitalization because I was sick and sneezed or coughed or transmitted it before I had symptoms then I'm happy with that.
originally posted by: HalWesten
originally posted by: LordAhriman
That's... not what it says. 95 caught it at the bar, and 12 people who didn't visit the bar have caught it from those 95 so far.
That's exactly what it says.
originally posted by: XCrycek
COVID-19 has claimed 112,311 U.S. lives. Thats higher than the 104,404 troops who died in every war since the start of the Korean War in 1950.
originally posted by: JIMC5499
The problem is that if you die of a heart attack or stroke and you also test positive for the virus your cause of death is heart attack with COVID or stroke with COVID and you are added to that number.
originally posted by: research100
originally posted by: HalWesten
originally posted by: LordAhriman
That's... not what it says. 95 caught it at the bar, and 12 people who didn't visit the bar have caught it from those 95 so far.
That's exactly what it says.
no the article says it started with 14 in the bar who had it the rest of these people caught it from these 14 during that time period.....they were all out there running around...will there then be an uptick of old people there getting really ill??
originally posted by: HalWesten
originally posted by: research100
originally posted by: HalWesten
originally posted by: LordAhriman
That's... not what it says. 95 caught it at the bar, and 12 people who didn't visit the bar have caught it from those 95 so far.
That's exactly what it says.
no the article says it started with 14 in the bar who had it the rest of these people caught it from these 14 during that time period.....they were all out there running around...will there then be an uptick of old people there getting really ill??
Well crap. I can't edit my previous post now but there is a fact that I skimmed over earlier so I apologize for my misunderstanding of the 95 infected.
Aside from that mistake, the rest of my OP is still valid, it's about sensationalizing something we all know is far less dangerous than we were told and are still told. Even Dr. Fauci stated it looks like it's far less dangerous to young people than they said. That was said during his hearing and conversation with Rand Paul the other day. I have now heard about two countries, Sweden and Italy saying they believe the virus is weakening. Let's hope that is the case here before long.