It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dr UAE
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
it looks like you and others here did not investigate before commenting
Tim pool did a good job, here is his investigation
go to 13:00 min, guess what, the thugs entered a private land and the owners had the right to aim weapons at them
wouldn't have you done the same?
originally posted by: frogs453
originally posted by: SolAquarius
originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: subfab
They were on their way to the Mayors mansion. I have not heard of random groups invading houses as they protest. That does not appear to have been their motive.
Well now that you bring up mayors mansions getting invaded......
MEANWHILE IN SEATTLE
Protesters march to Seattle Mayor Durkan's house as 'CHOP' scene continues
One of the demonstrators said, "We came down to Jenny Durkan's mansion to bring the demands of the movement and of the families who have been impacted by police violence to her doorstep as she seems to not be able to hear our demands any other way."
The mayor's office shared the follo
LINK
I never used the word "invaded" nor was the above mentioned mayors house invaded. Protesting in front of is not an invasion.
originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: Melen
Responsible gun owner here with a C.C.W. and a
member of the NRA...
I would not have gone out to my front yard.I would
have stayed inside and watched from the windows.
They would have to be forcing their way into my home
before I would react.Outside of my home,the bushes
and flowers can be replaced,people can not be.
originally posted by: Melen
They weren't protecting anything from anyone. The protestors were LET IN, they didn't "break in". They weren't doing anything to that couple.
And honestly, I don't care what side of the various debates you fall on to, but that lady waving that gun around like that is ridiculously dangerous. She could've accidentally shot someone NOT on her property, herself OR her husband.
I thought you NRA nuts wanted guns for responsible people. Waving guns around like that at people is not responsible. I hope it's criminal.
originally posted by: Melen
They weren't protecting anything from anyone. The protestors were LET IN, they didn't "break in". They weren't doing anything to that couple.
And honestly, I don't care what side of the various debates you fall on to, but that lady waving that gun around like that is ridiculously dangerous. She could've accidentally shot someone NOT on her property, herself OR her husband.
I thought you NRA nuts wanted guns for responsible people. Waving guns around like that at people is not responsible. I hope it's criminal.
originally posted by: mamabeth
a reply to: Melen
Responsible gun owner here with a C.C.W. and a
member of the NRA...
I would not have gone out to my front yard.I would
have stayed inside and watched from the windows.
They would have to be forcing their way into my home
before I would react.Outside of my home,the bushes
and flowers can be replaced,people can not be.
originally posted by: Blaine91555