Does the Coming Liberal Take Over of America Scare You ?

I always pointed out, it started when they thought kids to bully to stop bullies. All they did was to teach kids to bully other people.

People on the right never totally criticizes anything in the left

Black life matters is a poop group, and after saying that they have to pander, so the left wins.

At the moment the soviets Are winning the Cold War

Trump got scared. Covid was the perfect storm to bring back factories And Insert other American First policies.

a reply to: ErEhWoN

The Chinese Communist Party also enriched itself with capitalism.

Seems to be a trend in communist circles these days. They should probably read the book that states “Capitalism = MegaSatan” but who am i to judge?

a reply to: Metallicus

I honestly don’t think my vote will be counted this November. The Democrats have the fix in on the elections with their mail in voting scheme.

Yes they do.

And we will all drink upon the river of tears from Conservatives if Biden wins and the Dems take the Senate.

Dulce et Decorum es Pro Patria Mori.

a reply to: AlienView

The Democrats aren't going to bring socialism in the way you think they will.

The US is on a head first collision course with some form of feudal - corporate kleptocracy. All those far left leaning people swarming the streets and such are the useful idiots to get the ball rolling. It's been going on for decades, Democrats and Republicans alike, both privately run operations with trillions of dollars in their back pocket from the monster you were all force feeding through consumerism, and neo liberalism.

It's funny how people like Chomsky, Hedges, Hitchens, etc, all "liberal" mouth pieces have warned of such a world. And they were ignored, called socialists, communists, etc. Oh well.

a reply to: Ohanka

If the left continues as is, with it’s vitriolic racial hatred

Can you provide some examples of Dems using this 'vitriolic racial hatred'?

originally posted by: oloufo
a reply to: AlienView

who should take over what or whom exactly? america should rather think about a new electoral system. several parties. and also relax a bit. if you go out on the streets you will meet many liberals, and if you go to the doctor, it could be that he is a liberal, or the doctor who operates you, or the nurse who gives you pills. the machinist who repairs your car can be a liberal, and the fact that you have water and electricity is certainly due to some liberals. you only look at the extreme, but the extreme ones don't make up the majority. what we should all pay attention to: conspiracies poison societies because they have reached the middle of society, the average citizen. that's dangerous. because at some point people don't trust any institutions anymore, and eventually science is not trusted anymore either, and then we will fall back into the middle ages. there are conspiracies, no question about it, but not everything is conspiracy, many things are also just evil propaganda.

so this should all happen before November?

a reply to: xuenchen

Be Afraid.

Yes.

Be VERY Afraid ! 😨

And YES!

Fear will make you think better! You will have much clearer thought with FEAR as your prime motivating force.

Meanwhile, some of us are content knowing that you are scared.

Chickens are coming.


Coming home to roost.

a reply to: and14263

Avoid the effects of the inevitable by relocating to the countryside and turning off all streams of media. Head in sand strategy.

We may indeed see this strategy en masse.

Too early to tell though. I expect it will tighten up before November. October will give a better snapshot.

a reply to: Ohanka

The Chinese Communist Party also enriched itself with capitalism.

And they have done quite well for their people, I may add. More people lifted into middle class than any other time in history.

Now let's see what they do with it.

Seems to be a trend in communist circles these days. They should probably read the book that states “Capitalism = MegaSatan” but who am i to judge?

I think what is missing is BALANCE. All of one, or the other, is not healthy.

Pure Capitalism is not sustainable.

Pure Communism is evil.

Balance. Social health care if it works for your PEOPLE. Private ownership of property. Free enterprise. Free speech....


BALANCE.

We in the States are currently out of balance, because we have Corporations writing laws. This is an ABOMINATION.

We are out of balance. Balance will come, ready or not.

Chickens are coming......

originally posted by: ErEhWoN
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

It is not about whites versus blacks. Racism is just one of the vessels taking us to what is yet to come.

I've seen this before, I lived it before. Other places, other times, same story. I witnessed left coup and right coup. I even lived cold war between left and right wing countries. I'll tell you a few things you should expect :

- Terrorism.
- People making lines for essential goods.
- Mandatory military service.
- Corrupted authorities.
- Nationalized TV and media.
- Expropriations.
- People disappearance.
- New Constitution after years of war.
- More war.

a reply to: AlienView

They're still very much in denial about Biden vs Trump and expect Trump to surge in Q3 of 2020 during the run up to the election. His illusion of grandeur and his supreme rhetoric have had quite an effect. They can't or refuse to see the writing on the wall. They aren't able to observe the situation from the outside, the 3rd perspective. What they want and how they feel has been tweaked to the max.

No doubt, he's been as self centered as can be, hasn't met the Democrats in the middle on anything, and constantly heckles them throughout his reign. He ran on some form of independent conservative thing, not far right, focusing on what's best for the people and not just the GOP politically then did the opposite.

He divided the hell out of the country by being so ugly toward the left, the endless twitter rants, the constant statements about his opinions of liberals. No President in history has been so openly ugly about how he feels and letting the world know. He really energized the opposition into a heated, organized and pissed off enemy.

gal·va·nize
/ˈɡalvəˌnīz/
verb
past tense: galvanized; past participle: galvanized
1.
shock or excite (someone) into taking action.
"the urgency of his voice galvanized them into action"

Had he been more mature and moderate about it instead of having fun immaturely with his power to turn it into a political # show fit for television, do you think the opposition would be as powerful and unified as it is right now? Perhaps they wouldn't have steered so far left as they have in his term? The Obama era Democrats seem much more moderate and less progressive compared to this.

I honestly think he didn't know wtf he was doing and no one could tell him otherwise which has been a theme of his presidency.

Obama being so popular and "black" had a similar effect on the right which unified enough to get Trump into office, but not like this, not this bad. He didn't talk # about them and make fun of them on twitter for 4 years straight. He was much more professional about his term. I can only imagine and wait to see what the effect of Trump will be on the next 4 years.

a reply to: AlienView

Liberal or conservative... two sides of the same coin.

When do we shine a big fat spotlight on ourselves???

The critters aren't committing their dirty deeds in a vacuum. And it isn't about left or right. It's about power and control, and there are plenty of people who are quite happy to impose their will on others. House arrest anyone? Face masks? Men in women's bathrooms? Shoot first and ask questions later?

We see it right here on ATS every single day. How many posters right here are demanding further lockdowns and house arrests to protect themselves from the inevitable, not giving a rats' patootie who is hurt in the process? Oh, and of course, without a care for those "essential workers" who have to continue working to make the world go round so that some folks can hid in their homes all safe and protected? How many are demanding everyone wear face masks without regard for the very serious health risks it poses to many of us? And even mock or belittle their health issues? How many here have happily declared that men are "really" women and demand that our sex-based rights are now men's rights? How many here have snickered at the left eating their own with absolutely no regard for the danger it is putting their own wives, mothers, daughters, etc. How many here have defended and even lauded police for killing citizens in cold blood on the streets because the cops was afraid that the person might be a threat?

I don't care what anyone says or thinks or even does, as long as they have no power over me or anyone except themselves.

Picking and choosing which tyrant rules over us is just giving them permission to rule over us.

I'm choosing "HELL NO" to all of them!!!

a reply to: SleeperHasAwakened

Show us the data you keep yapping about that forecasts when exaclty whites will be shoved to the "back of the bus" (this ought to be funny).

This data is freely available. Provided to you by the government, no less. It has been long known this titanic shift was coming. IMHO, it is the source of much of the social strife we are experiencing. Back an animal into a corner, and it will strike out. People of the Caucasus sense whats going on. They are powerless to do ANYTHING about it.

They aren't making enough babies.

The whole United States of America is projected to become majority-minority by the middle of the 21st century if current trends continue, making the US the first major post-industrial society in the world where the majority status of a dominant group will be lost due to mass immigration.[13] With alternate immigration scenarios, the whole United States is projected to become majority-minority sometime between 2041 and 2046 (depending on the amount of net immigration into the U.S. over the preceding years).[14][15]
Ethnic minority children will be the majority in the entire United States by 2020.[16]

en.wikipedia.org...

Also, define this amorphous "PoC" demographic you mention. What exactly does that mean to you?

Today the term "person of color" (plural: people of color, persons of color; sometimes abbreviated POC)[1] is primarily used to describe any person who is not considered White in the United States. During various periods in US history, persons of color included African Americans, Latino Americans, Asian Americans, Native Americans, Pacific Islander Americans, and Multiracial Americans. The term emphasizes common experiences of systemic racism.[2][3] The term may also be used with other collective categories of people such as "communities of color", "men of color" (MOC), and "women of color" (WOC).[4] The acronym BIPOC refers to black, indigenous, and other people of color and aims to emphasize the historic oppression of black and indigenous people.

en.wikipedia.org...


I don't hate caucasians. On my census I put my race as Human. And I will have sex with ANY race. This is proven fact.

There are only two types of government: authoritarian and libertarian.

Authoritarian systems promote the power of the government.

Libertarian systems promote the freedom of the individual.

You can play semantics with this ... and change the terms, but the innate meanings are the same.

The other fact is that libertarians ALWAYS shift toward authoritarianism when they get into power.

For example, authoritarian once meant "right" and libertarian meant "left."

Then, RIght meant conservative and left meant liberal.

Then, conservative meant reactionary and liberal meant progressive.

However, all too often, progressives became more authoritarian WHEN IN POWER even when the intention to promote the rights of the individual is strong ... because this only happens while focusing on increasing theh right of some individuals while limiting the rights of others to discriminate.

Which caused the reactionary in turn to focus on the rights of the individual to discriminate against others, and so on and so on.

For example of how the trend is always from libertarian to authoritarian, in the early US, one could say that the Federalists were more authoritarian and the Democratic-Republicans were more libertarian ...

... except that the D-Rs were not libertarian, primarily ... they just wanted the focus of the power of government to reside at the individual State level to be wielded by White men of property, so they too were more authoritarian than libertarian in the end.

When any "party" gets into power, they quickly transform into authoritarians and while some libertarians maintain some balance ... others do not.

TL-DR: Beware authoritarians masquerading as libertarians.

a reply to: Gryphon66

the way you describe it, you, a leftie, are all for personal responsibilities and freedoms. Well slap my mama, I, a righty feel the same way. Or are you kidding and you are really pro government?

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: Gryphon66

the way you describe it, you, a leftie, are all for personal responsibilities and freedoms. Well slap my mama, I, a righty feel the same way. Or are you kidding and you are really pro government?

I've been very clear on my positions I think, and at the same time, I'm not responsible for your opinions of me.

I am not a "leftie" in any way shape form or fashion as you and others commonly use the term.

My preference would be no government at all, barring that, the only proper use of government power is to preserve the rights of the individual.

You seem constrained by your own definitions. The solution is simple.

Are you more concerned with increasing the power of the government or the freedom of the individual?

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: AlienView
Some liberal ideas are SUPERB.

It's too bad Pelosi is so batshi't uncompromising.

Trump has offered her so many olive branches over the past 18 months.

Each time, the heifer spat in his face, because "meeting in the middle" would make her look like she's "giving in".

Personally I think the Liberals and Democrats squandered the best chance they've ever had to get some of their signature initiatives accomplished when they decided to paint Trump into their Hitler style arch nemesis in order to save face for their party royalty. The man might have an ego the size of a country and a foul mouth to go with it; but he is easily manipulated and doesn't have an ideological bone in his body. The Liberals and Democrats could have gotten him to support a lot of things they could never get passed the Republicans and all they had to do was throw Hillary under the bus and stroke Trumps ego. As a result they would have gotten an ally in the white house who could make his support base go along with him (them); something Republican Senators could never stand up too.

Unfortunately the leaders of the Democratic party are just as childish and self-serving as Donald Trump himself; maybe even more so and while Trump is one man they are an entire party leadership with out one person with the integrity to put their ideals above themselves.

There is a rot growing on the Democratic party! I was hoping a loss to Donald Trump would be enough to shake them loose of it ... and for a few months in early 2017 there where some struggles inside the Democratic party. It appeared as if the decent people in the party where doing some proper introspection unfortunately it turned out that the rot was to strong for them and they were quickly brought to heal. Now it looks like a loss to Donald Trump was the catalyst the rot needed to flourish.