Supreme Court blocks Trump from ending DACA

originally posted by: matafuchs
None of you read it did you? It does not say no it says the way they approached it was incorrect and they need to refile. They will. It is even explained that the SCOTUS knows it is not legal but needs the argument a different way.

Then, Roberts will vote against DACA.

Trump offered DACA and was given the finger by Pelosi and Chuck.

This. The media is panting this as a "loss" for Trump because that's what they do. The SCOTUS actually backed him up that DACA is bogus, they just disapproved of his method.

Justice Clarence Thomas put it best. The ruling was a timid attempt at avoiding controversy.

www.foxnews.com...

Let's hope they are just as timid when a Democrat president tries to overturn President Trump's executive orders.. in 24 years or so.

a reply to: Southern Guardian

I remember Trump offering Pelosi and Schumer a deal for twice as many DACA for a deal for the wall.

I guess the left didn't care about DACA then, but now it's a big deal to them. lol.

Now the left wants to cry about how Trump, who offered a great deal, really great deal, doesn't care for DACA.

You can't make this stuff up.

Short memories and all.

Oh and just for good measure, I wanted to point out that as usual the media is moving on from black people getting shot to illegal aliens. They totally just let the LGBT decision FLY by for use at a later date.

originally posted by: matafuchs
Oh and just for good measure, I wanted to point out that as usual the media is moving on from black people getting shot to illegal aliens. They totally just let the LGBT decision FLY by for use at a later date.

Why a later date, how about dealing with it now?

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

Simple enough, DACA is compassion...put that in penning.

a reply to: InTheLight

Because that is how the media rolls. Right now it is all about black protesters...right? Well, now with the DACA decision i will bet that this weekend and next will be marches for Dreamers.

Then, in a few weeks when that dies down they will find a LGBT who was fired from their job and quote the SCOTUS case.

IT is sad we no longer have reporting we have OP-Ed's on a rotating schedule.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

Simple enough, DACA is compassion...put that in penning.

The problem, regardless of how you feel on the DACA matter, is how it was done. He essentially created legislation from his executive desk. The Court hinted that--had that been the question before it--the outcome may have been different.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: InTheLight

Because that is how the media rolls. Right now it is all about black protesters...right? Well, now with the DACA decision i will bet that this weekend and next will be marches for Dreamers.

Then, in a few weeks when that dies down they will find a LGBT who was fired from their job and quote the SCOTUS case.

IT is sad we no longer have reporting we have OP-Ed's on a rotating schedule.

No, it is what it is...only DACA.

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

Simple enough, DACA is compassion...put that in penning.

The problem, regardless of how you feel on the DACA matter, it how it was done. He essentially created legislation from his executive desk. The Court hinted that--had that been the questions before it--the outcome may have been different.

Double talk, do you want to deport doctors, essential workers out of the U.S.A.?

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

Simple enough, DACA is compassion...put that in penning.

The problem, regardless of how you feel on the DACA matter, it how it was done. He essentially created legislation from his executive desk. The Court hinted that--had that been the questions before it--the outcome may have been different.

Double talk, do you want to deport doctors, essential workers out of the U.S.A.?

You're not getting my point. Your emotional banter aside, its a violation of how the government is supposed to work. It should have been voted on by congress, not by authoritarian decree. You might happen to enjoy this particular result, now, but for those wiser than yourself who can see past their own noses, the unintended consequences are significant.

a reply to: Southern Guardian

What does the deep state have on Roberts, he is also responsible for rewriting Obama care to mak it a tax.

a reply to: InTheLight

The ruling emphasizes that the administration failed to provide an adequate reason to justify ending the DACA program.

Re-file with a better reason this ain’t over yet .

a reply to: InTheLight

Yes. They can go back to their own countries of origin and be doctors and essential workers. That would help those countries right? The skills they learned here brought back to their own to make it great again also. Damn, so if you think about it if Trump does dismantle DACA all those people and go back and make the world better.

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

The entire issue is directly related to Obama.
He created DACA with an executive order.

What the Supreme Court did was rubber stamp a President creating law.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

Simple enough, DACA is compassion...put that in penning.

The problem, regardless of how you feel on the DACA matter, it how it was done. He essentially created legislation from his executive desk. The Court hinted that--had that been the questions before it--the outcome may have been different.

Double talk, do you want to deport doctors, essential workers out of the U.S.A.?

Your emotions are not relevant to the law.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

Simple enough, DACA is compassion...put that in penning.

The problem, regardless of how you feel on the DACA matter, it how it was done. He essentially created legislation from his executive desk. The Court hinted that--had that been the questions before it--the outcome may have been different.

Double talk, do you want to deport doctors, essential workers out of the U.S.A.?

Your emotions are not relevant to the law.

My repeating of the facts should be relevant to everybody.

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: InTheLight

originally posted by: timequake

originally posted by: Southern Guardian
a reply to: carewemust

They would not overturn Obama's executive order even though it is unlawful.

What does the OP have to do with Obama? Must you always bring him or Hillary up in every post?

Because DACA was an executive order penned (and with a phone) by Obama. Simple enough.

Simple enough, DACA is compassion...put that in penning.

The problem, regardless of how you feel on the DACA matter, it how it was done. He essentially created legislation from his executive desk. The Court hinted that--had that been the questions before it--the outcome may have been different.

Double talk, do you want to deport doctors, essential workers out of the U.S.A.?

Your emotions are not relevant to the law.

My repeating of the facts should be relevant to everybody.

The point you were responding to was correct in every way. Your point about doctors and nurses is wholly irrelevant to the fact that DACA was created by executive order and not by Congress. Your feelings actually mean nothing at all to anyone but yourself and those that happen to care about your feelings.

a reply to: matafuchs

It does not say no it says the way they approached it was incorrect and they need to refile. They will. It is even explained that the SCOTUS knows it is not legal but needs the argument a different way.

Why do you support "the argument"? These people grew up and were educated and are working here. They pay taxes and contribute to the economy. What do you have against them?