It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat
Yes. A decline during the period testing was increasing. That makes sense. Follow my posts in this thread to see if I disagree.
Sure. Let's wait another three weeks. To find out if the infection rate has increased with the relaxation of mitigation measures. Do you really think it won't?
Said the skier to the snowball.
But waiting and seeing what happens is the only logical corse of action.
They can choose to live and stay inside.
People still have to work to make your food, deliver it to the grocery, ring it up, provide you with electricity, heating and cooling, phones, internet, etc.
Is your life more important than theirs?
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MRinder
They can choose to live and stay inside.
Tell that to the folks in nursing homes who "stayed put."
And contracted it and died.
People still have to work to make your food, deliver it to the grocery, ring it up, provide you with electricity, heating and cooling, phones, internet, etc.
Exactly. Contradiction, much? So staying home is not a feasible option, now is it?
Is your life more important than theirs?
Is your right to go out without a mask and put people at risk more important than their right to safely go out and not be infected selfish jerks?
Stay inside then,
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MRinder
Of course not. So I'd they can man up and do what has to be done then I owe it to them to do the same.
Yeah.
Macho is the ticket.
It is nothing to do with being Macho.
Of course not. So I'd they can man up and do what has to be done then I owe it to them to do the same.
originally posted by: Phage
Because I understand how probabilities work.
And I will wear a mask when called for. Not to protect myself, but to protect others.
originally posted by: MRinder
originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: MRinder
They can choose to live and stay inside.
Tell that to the folks in nursing homes who "stayed put."
And contracted it and died.
People still have to work to make your food, deliver it to the grocery, ring it up, provide you with electricity, heating and cooling, phones, internet, etc.
Exactly. Contradiction, much? So staying home is not a feasible option, now is it?
Is your life more important than theirs?
Is your right to go out without a mask and put people at risk more important than their right to safely go out and not be infected selfish jerks?
Did I say I didn't wear a mask?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: DanDanDat
Said the skier to the snowball.
But waiting and seeing what happens is the only logical corse of action.
There has been an increase here. I see no one running in circles but I do see people saying, "oh, maybe we should rethink things a bit."