Video showing Warlord RAZ handing out guns in the CHAZ

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: SolAquarius

Actually, if Underworks is reading this, send a text to your Warlord friend and tell him that he needs to rename the place to Organized Opposition Of Police States. (OOOPS)

After all, it would just make sense.

I like Anti-Police Escape Society.

(APES)

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

FFS?
Are you serious?
This is an illegal takeover of part of a major US city, this is domestic terrorism.
I say drop a MOAB down between the buildings and pick up the pieces later, end of the siege of Seattle.

It's a street fest.

Stop watching Fox.

So you're ok with dropping a bomb on an American city, thereby killing a large segment of its population, collateral damage and innocents ok?

You're not a friend to America or an American, if you truly believe that should happen because they don't agree with you politically.

Sad!

A “street fest” where the leader is passing out weapons out of the trunk of his car for patrols?
You see that stuff in old clips of ISIS held territory in Iraq too.

If what republicans can be armed patrols, so can anyone else.

Get a grip on reality.
It’s outrageous that you are attempting to minimize this.

Perhaps you should.

Republicans with gunz=ok. Liberals with gunz=no ok.

You all are making it clear.

The Second Amendment is conditional to you, as well as the First Amendment right to peacefully assemble.

You know exactly what you are doing.

I do.

Exposing hypocrisy.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

FFS?
Are you serious?
This is an illegal takeover of part of a major US city, this is domestic terrorism.
I say drop a MOAB down between the buildings and pick up the pieces later, end of the siege of Seattle.

It's a street fest.

Stop watching Fox.

So you're ok with dropping a bomb on an American city, thereby killing a large segment of its population, collateral damage and innocents ok?

You're not a friend to America or an American, if you truly believe that should happen because they don't agree with you politically.

Sad!

A “street fest” where the leader is passing out weapons out of the trunk of his car for patrols?
You see that stuff in old clips of ISIS held territory in Iraq too.

If what republicans can be armed patrols, so can anyone else.

Get a grip on reality.
It’s outrageous that you are attempting to minimize this.

Perhaps you should.

Republicans with gunz=ok. Liberals with gunz=no ok.

You all are making it clear.

The Second Amendment is conditional to you, as well as the First Amendment right to peacefully assemble.

But you just said that they were not law abiding citizens.

Are you backing out of that now?

But the Second Amendment to the Constitution say they have a right to bear arms.

That's the argument the right uses.

You realize you are not making any sense.

You screwed up.

You thought you had a point but in reality you didn't.

Now some might have enough common sense and admit it, obviously you have not.

When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.

It just makes you look sad.

a reply to: Jonjonj

Antifa South Seattle Entitled Suckers.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

FFS?
Are you serious?
This is an illegal takeover of part of a major US city, this is domestic terrorism.
I say drop a MOAB down between the buildings and pick up the pieces later, end of the siege of Seattle.

It's a street fest.

Stop watching Fox.

So you're ok with dropping a bomb on an American city, thereby killing a large segment of its population, collateral damage and innocents ok?

You're not a friend to America or an American, if you truly believe that should happen because they don't agree with you politically.

Sad!

A “street fest” where the leader is passing out weapons out of the trunk of his car for patrols?
You see that stuff in old clips of ISIS held territory in Iraq too.

If what republicans can be armed patrols, so can anyone else.

Get a grip on reality.
It’s outrageous that you are attempting to minimize this.

Perhaps you should.

Republicans with gunz=ok. Liberals with gunz=no ok.

You all are making it clear.

The Second Amendment is conditional to you, as well as the First Amendment right to peacefully assemble.

You know exactly what you are doing.

I do.

Exposing hypocrisy.

By self incrimination? How exactly does that work then? You will show the hypocrisy of your enemies by...being a massive hypocrite?

Good luck with that matey, good luck with that.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

FFS?
Are you serious?
This is an illegal takeover of part of a major US city, this is domestic terrorism.
I say drop a MOAB down between the buildings and pick up the pieces later, end of the siege of Seattle.

It's a street fest.

Stop watching Fox.

So you're ok with dropping a bomb on an American city, thereby killing a large segment of its population, collateral damage and innocents ok?

You're not a friend to America or an American, if you truly believe that should happen because they don't agree with you politically.

Sad!

A “street fest” where the leader is passing out weapons out of the trunk of his car for patrols?
You see that stuff in old clips of ISIS held territory in Iraq too.

If what republicans can be armed patrols, so can anyone else.

Get a grip on reality.
It’s outrageous that you are attempting to minimize this.

Perhaps you should.

Republicans with gunz=ok. Liberals with gunz=no ok.

You all are making it clear.

The Second Amendment is conditional to you, as well as the First Amendment right to peacefully assemble.

But you just said that they were not law abiding citizens.

Are you backing out of that now?

But the Second Amendment to the Constitution say they have a right to bear arms.

That's the argument the right uses.

It doesn’t say you can put one in ones face and threaten them and that’s exactly what some have done. You seem to want to justify and defend this nonsense and anything else remotely left to the death.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Jonjonj

Antifa South Seattle Entitled Suckers.

As much as I like all the acronyms, I keep coming back to your SPAZ, it is literally the definition.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

FFS?
Are you serious?
This is an illegal takeover of part of a major US city, this is domestic terrorism.
I say drop a MOAB down between the buildings and pick up the pieces later, end of the siege of Seattle.

It's a street fest.

Stop watching Fox.

So you're ok with dropping a bomb on an American city, thereby killing a large segment of its population, collateral damage and innocents ok?

You're not a friend to America or an American, if you truly believe that should happen because they don't agree with you politically.

Sad!

A “street fest” where the leader is passing out weapons out of the trunk of his car for patrols?
You see that stuff in old clips of ISIS held territory in Iraq too.

If what republicans can be armed patrols, so can anyone else.

Get a grip on reality.
It’s outrageous that you are attempting to minimize this.

Perhaps you should.

Republicans with gunz=ok. Liberals with gunz=no ok.

You all are making it clear.

The Second Amendment is conditional to you, as well as the First Amendment right to peacefully assemble.

But you just said that they were not law abiding citizens.

Are you backing out of that now?

But the Second Amendment to the Constitution say they have a right to bear arms.

That's the argument the right uses.

You realize you are not making any sense.

You screwed up.

You thought you had a point but in reality you didn't.

Now some might have enough common sense and admit it, obviously you have not.

When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.

It just makes you look sad.

My point stands, if you can actually see the bigger picture.

Right with gunz=good, liberals with gunz=bad, in the BS narrative pushed by the right about Seattle and stubbornly defended here.

Because the 2nd Amendment has a double standard implication to a large segment of the right, which is a large part of the problems we're seeing.

Pretty simple.

...

Oh, and the video is propaganda. Just like to supposed Antifa boogeyman.

Pretty sad if you can't see it all for what it is.

a reply to: Liquesence

Yes you are. Yours.

You and people like you who excuse this garbage show your increasing ignorance everytime you post.

a reply to: mtnshredder

You seem to want to justify and defend this nonsense and anything else remotely left to the death.

It works both ways. Funny that suddenly because it's the "left" is not justified but when it involves similar on the "right" it's entirely justified.

Whether occupying places/statehouses, being armed, bearing arms, etc.

That's the hypocrisy that so many still don't see: The right does it, cool, the left does it, bomb and destroy them.

Not difficult.

originally posted by: BoscoMoney
a reply to: Liquesence

Yes you are. Yours.

You and people like you who excuse this garbage show your increasing ignorance everytime you post.

The same who excuse their own side while condemning the other side for doing it.

Round and round, and people still don't get it.

a reply to: Liquesence

That's the hypocrisy that so many still don't see: The right does it, cool, the left does it, bomb and destroy them.

Hold on a minute, isn't ATS a right wing echo chamber, what would you expect?

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

Actually liberals with guns are good .

It makes me laugh .

The head guy didn’t even know how to take the clip out and had to be reminded to keep the gun down .

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

M
And nobody is saying guns or the 2A are bad now

Especially those who were saying it before.

So now gunz and Second Amendment goodz ‘cause it’s cucks with gunz and not people who actually like the United States, just weak gutless pussies who want to destroy it

Which is why you (and EVERY anti-gun lefty on this site) have flip flopped and suddenly approve of the 2nd amendment

You people are nothing if not predictable

originally posted by: Liquesence
So now gunz and Second Amendment badz, 'cause it's liberals with the gunz and not red-blooded gun-toting white Republicans "defending" and patrolling 'Murica?

Can't make this # up.

If you can’t tell the difference between responsible gun ownership and kids being handed random guns out of the back of someone’s car then the least you could do is not interrupt when the grown folks are talking

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: mtnshredder

You seem to want to justify and defend this nonsense and anything else remotely left to the death.

It works both ways. Funny that suddenly because it's the "left" is not justified but when it involves similar on the "right" it's entirely justified.

Whether occupying places/statehouses, being armed, bearing arms, etc.

That's the hypocrisy that so many still don't see: The right does it, cool, the left does it, bomb and destroy them.

Not difficult.

Then you will be quite OK if the right rises up and uses their guns to re-establish the rule of law in America by ridding it of the left.

Constitutionally, even.

Thanks for clearing that up.

a reply to: SolAquarius

I'm curious... why film something like this?

I mean... will there be no repercussions from this? None that this dude handing them out is liable for?

Who are those registered to?

Are they loaded?

I mean... if they are loaded someone is guaranteed gonna die.

a reply to: SolAquarius

There are going to be three outcomes and one of them I really want to see:

1 - They get bored and go home.

2 - The Army shows up, begin to remove their fences etc. and it ends with a whimper.

3 - Their Mothers show up, tell them playtime is over and they are taken home for some nice orange slices and a crisp sandwich.

Gee I wonder which one is most likely lol.

a reply to: SolAquarius


Hmm...Are they being Licensed ?

a reply to: Liquesence

You can't be serious.
Are you really unable to tell the difference between:
people who have registered firearms, and licenses to carry them, carrying them legally and
a guy handing an ar-15 over to a random kid in the street, so he can defend the borders of an imaginary "autonomous zone" that was established by pushing the police out of their precinct?

It's a friggin armed occupation.

Really?