Violence in the name of Trump.

Just to add a bit of balance to the arguments currently taking place on ATS. Left or Right, no one comes out in a good light.

Here is a list of low life's.


Pipe Bombs.
Racists.
Assaults.
Death Threats,

Not nice reading.

www.theguardian.com...

a reply to: alldaylong

So you're saying people suck?

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: alldaylong

So you're saying people suck?

I think you are correct.

It's too bad that is a one-sided article, only showing the people that have committed violent acts because they support Trump. A fair article would show the numerous attacks against Trump supporters. You know, being punched in the face for simply wearing a hat, being chased out of restaurants because of the political party they support, stuff like that.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: alldaylong

So you're saying people suck?

I think you are correct.

English people suck. Its the guardian

a reply to: Bluntone22

The Guardian sucks. But he's right about it not being nice reading.

It's hackery of the highest order and the print equivalent of CNN.

a reply to: alldaylong

I wonder how many churches have been defaced, cop cars burned, stores looted, and monuments desecrated in the name of Trump or by someone on the Right? I'm having a damn hard time finding it on the web, so I can only assume it's been covered up! Surely one of the ATS super sleuths can dig that information up, yes?

Using a UK based media to further anti-Trump sentiment.
Imagine that.
Want to post the same for Barry's presidency ?
How bout Hoover ?
Lincoln would be too easy.
Just sayin...

Wow, this is essentially one massive Whataboutism by liberal media.

They can't do anything on the optics the Dems are recieving and as support and polls collapse for the democrats, the DNC arm of the media will now switch from instigation to blame 😌

Typical and expected.

originally posted by: HalWesten
It's too bad that is a one-sided article, only showing the people that have committed violent acts because they support Trump. A fair article would show the numerous attacks against Trump supporters. You know, being punched in the face for simply wearing a hat, being chased out of restaurants because of the political party they support, stuff like that.

E mail The Guardian then and ask them to compile one. I can only post what's available.

Predictable responses. No surprise there.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: HalWesten
It's too bad that is a one-sided article, only showing the people that have committed violent acts because they support Trump. A fair article would show the numerous attacks against Trump supporters. You know, being punched in the face for simply wearing a hat, being chased out of restaurants because of the political party they support, stuff like that.

E mail The Guardian then and ask them to compile one. I can only post what's available.

That's the problem.
When someone claiming to be the media only presents one side it pretty much disqualifies them from being considered journalists.

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: alldaylong

So you're saying people suck?

I think you are correct.

English people suck. Its the guardian

We don't all suck.

We generally regard the Grauniad as a joke in the UK and nobody takes them at all seriously.

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: HalWesten
It's too bad that is a one-sided article, only showing the people that have committed violent acts because they support Trump. A fair article would show the numerous attacks against Trump supporters. You know, being punched in the face for simply wearing a hat, being chased out of restaurants because of the political party they support, stuff like that.

E mail The Guardian then and ask them to compile one. I can only post what's available.

I understand the point of your thread, but honestly I would have preferred to see a side-by-side comparison to be fair to both sides.

originally posted by: alldaylong

Predictable responses. No surprise there.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

Well no, see... you're attempting to make a "X is bad, so X shouldn't complain about Y being bad" argument when, in reality, your examples of X's sins PALES in comparison to the mountainous pile of bullcrap we've had to deal with from Y. The man who has just literally shat his pants in a crowded elevator has no room to complain about the smell of the person with dog crap on their shoe.

originally posted by: alldaylong

Predictable responses. No surprise there.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

Here's an exercise for you. Prove me wrong. Look up the articles of things Trump supporters have done vs the things Trump haters have done. Then come back and tell me I was wrong.

originally posted by: Tulpa

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: alldaylong

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: alldaylong

So you're saying people suck?

I think you are correct.

English people suck. Its the guardian

We don't all suck.

We generally regard the Grauniad as a joke in the UK and nobody takes them at all seriously.

Ok
You may be ok
But the rest suck
Lol

a reply to: HalWesten

the things Trump haters have done

I am sure you can find a list of those.

Find it and post it. No one is stopping you from doing so. As i said, this thread is to add a bit of balance.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Even my phone agrees.

I typed in G-R-A-U and the autospell feature finished the rest of the word for me.

They know.

(It's famous for misspelled words even their own title).

originally posted by: alldaylong
a reply to: HalWesten

the things Trump haters have done

I am sure you can find a list of those.

Find it and post it. No one is stopping you from doing so. As i said, this thread is to add a bit of balance.

Like I said, I understand why you posted it. Then you said

"Predictable responses. No surprise there.

Sometimes the truth hurts."

So the burden of proof is on you. Otherwise your attempt at "fairness" is not relevant.