It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I have my own theories, occasionally expressed in far flung corners of the internet, and the search has gotten me in some trouble here and there. You can know a lot of information, and still find yourself totally unprepared for what you find... and it can be so shocking as to change your whole reality. It can be so outside the realms of common understanding, that it isolates you, or brings you to a state of abject fear and shock. But sometimes, falling down is a lesson in standing back up again.
originally posted by: IsaacKoi
(These points should not, of course, be taken as suggesting that governments and skeptics are always correct in their statements. At some point, I really should post details of various statements by government officials regarding UFOs with proof they are untrue).
I'd say at least the Nimitz FLIR video is evidence of NOT disclosure. People close to the event have said that the crew of the E2 radar plane got a better "look" at the UFO than Fravor perhaps visually and electronically though all they can really say for sure is the E2 crew is not allowed to talk about what they saw or what their instruments recorded, and they were required to sign non-disclosure forms.
originally posted by: jidnum
Didn't the pentagon already admit those 3 "UFO" videos are legit and are "Unidentified Flying Objects"? Isn't that disclosure? Is there different degrees of disclosure or something I'm not aware of?
I mean pentagon literally said yes these videos are real and yes they are of UFOS....
That's disclosure to me.
Or are you talking about face to face conversations with ET's?
So, they call them "UAP" to avoid pre-judging the results of any investigation.
When an observed object is NOT immediately identifiable, the Navy/DOD refers to it as UAP (unidentified aerial phenomena). The generic term UAP is used in communications to avoid pre-judging the results of any investigation...
As the investigation of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) sightings is ongoing, we will not discuss any aspect of individual sighting reports / observations, including frequency of sightings...
Sue Gough
Pentagon Spokesperson
originally posted by: ConfusedBrit
A superb thread for the ages, as important as the other archived and pinned threads you have blessed ATS with.
I may have missed it, but there is also the legendary (at least to ufology if not the wider public) tale of TV writer and composer Robert Emenegger being asked by the U.S. Department of Defense to create the 1974 award-winning UFO documentary, UFOs: Past, Present And Future, the carrot being that the DoD promised him genuine colour footage of a 1971 (or 1964, dependent on which source!) UFO landing, featuring alien contact with personnel at Holloman Air Force Base.
originally posted by: IsaacKoi
originally posted by: chiefsmom
I wonder, with your extensive research, do you feel as though we will never have "True" disclosure?
.....when they are relying upon perceived patterns that have previously proven to be unrealiable indicators of forthcoming "Disclosure".