It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
it would be buffeted by the wind rather than flying such a perfectly straight path.
originally posted by: Guiltyguitarist
a reply to: Forensick
I know nothing about the military or technology for that matter but I feel like it would be very dangerous for the pilots if their targeting systems were locking into birds instead of enemy fighters. Take it for what it’s worth but I’m pretty confident that they can’t lock into birds
originally posted by: Jay-morris
With these three Navy videos now being classed as unidentified, a lot of people, including myself was very happy because I believe it means we are heading in the right direction. I came across a video that made me question one of the videos.
The video in question is the one with the object travelling fast near the water with a pilot and his partner tracking it.
Now, the video in question, the guy is annoying as hell with the type of arragonce you would expect, but he brings up some good points. Points that are hard to debunk.
Here is the video
Can this object be nothing more than a bird? If so, how the hell did they not know? Surely they see birds all the time.
Would like your thoughts
The pilot was not being arrogant jack ass.... Do you have any idea how hard it is to get a lock on something like that manually like he was doing? He was proud of himself for doing something that was not easy to do. pull your head out please...
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: Jay-morris
Hmm, it appears my post was cut off. My apologies jay morris.
I meant to include that mainly the pilots involves could've IDed it as a bird and that it would've had flight surfaces and heat signatures*
Not sure why my post got lt trimmed probably my mobiles fault
I did watch the video. I just so happen to take the word of veteran Navy fighter pilots over an analysis from somebody who was not there.
We sentence people to death based on witness testimony, assuming it is credible testimony. And this doesn't get any more credible. And then on top of that you have photographic evidence consistent with the witness statements.
To put it another way, if this were a murder trial it'd be a "slam dunk"
When the pilots say they behave like technology produced off-world, I take their word on it and believe them. I operate under the assumption they were extraterrestrial articles operating around our task force.
Because lets face it, Russia/China didn't pass us up overnight and even if they did, they wouldn't risk such a significant advantage by flying it near US Navy strike groups (that's a good way to lose your tech right?). Even today, both those countries combined are 1/10th as strong economically, and even less than that militarily. They aren't peers to the United States.
Lets face facts here, governments around the world (especially US government) is lying about the UFO/UAP phenomenon. They've given every excuse under the sun, but these are lies. There isn't much left other than the ET hypothesis. Anybody who thinks this massive universe exists for one meager species is.......just wrong.
Saying that, I do not go into the subject believing everything I see as unexplained.
I ask a serious question regarding this footage, but no one seems to be able to prove what he is saying in the video is wrong.