It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Adonsa
Hello,
Reference and respectful acknowledgement is made to those of you who posted to the Link for which, at least the title, is political.
Caveat: This query, here, is intended to be medical only without regard to whether or not any US politicians or political news reporters like or hate the concept.
Reference is made to Far-UVC light: A new tool to control the spread of airborne-mediated microbial diseases
Various websites claim that the 222nm UV light frequency is harmless to the retina.
And, of course they would claim that, in order to support the technology.
This is why I'm taking the question here, to you,
the scholars and subject matter experts of ATS.
I have a hand held wand, for sterilizing objects, that came with strong
warnings to avoid staring into it or staring into any reflection of it.
I wear appropriate protective goggles or just close my eyes
when using it to disinfect things.
This wand is surely a different wavelength than new 222nm models.
And so the question becomes, "Is the 222nm "Far" technology really safe to stare at?
I have to be skeptical of the manufacturers' safety claims, and that's why I'm
here, to defer to you guys for the real answers.
Thank you very very much.
originally posted by: buddha
I said in a post about this that it WILL hurt the eye.
just 1 seconds will leave a little scaring in the back of the eye.
about a hour later you will get a feeling like grit in the eye.
that is the scaring. dont bother rubing it or puting drops in the eye.
it is inside the eye. it will heal in about 4 hours. or less.
So Dont look directly at the UV light.
it is NOT the same as a Disco UV light.
they are safe.
originally posted by: rickymouse
I doubt if it would be good for anyone if they were in that light for a longer period of time. It would be all right to use a wand, as long as it is not shining in your eyes for long periods of time. The light is good for sterilizing stuff, but remember, our skin is loaded with beneficial bacteria, they are not all bad. We live symbiotically with certain bacteria.
If we start living in a sterile environment it will be bad for us, there are viruses and bacteria all over the place. If it is too sterile, we wind up overreacting when we are exposed to anything or we wind up with an inferior innate immune response to actual pathogenic microbes.
I would not want to have those lights on all day long, but would not feel using a wand in a grocery store while working would be something I would worry about. To me, the cleaning chemicals they use would be probably worse than the UV light.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: buddha
I said in a post about this that it WILL hurt the eye.
just 1 seconds will leave a little scaring in the back of the eye.
about a hour later you will get a feeling like grit in the eye.
that is the scaring. dont bother rubing it or puting drops in the eye.
it is inside the eye. it will heal in about 4 hours. or less.
So Dont look directly at the UV light.
it is NOT the same as a Disco UV light.
they are safe.
You are right, or at least near right.
I had my right eye, (just in the right eye) some rods damaged in an area near the top of vision to the right, while not in the main area of focus thankfully, by a car waiting to turn left at a junction on my right. I just happened to glance, without turning my head so much, at that car which had a ridiculously lowered suspension, an older model VW Jetta, or Passat...popular here for youngsters who mess, and got a serious flash of very strong blue to the white light, much stronger than xenon, and it did hurt noticeably.
It left me with a grey 'fog' effect exactly like a glaucoma sufferer might have, however that effect has not gone away, the rods, or rather some of them are permanently damaged.
I still have 20/20 corrected vision thankfully, as the damage is not in the main point of focus, but the grey crescent shaped, 'fog' (the shape of the lamp?) remains.
originally posted by: buddha
originally posted by: rickymouse
I doubt if it would be good for anyone if they were in that light for a longer period of time. It would be all right to use a wand, as long as it is not shining in your eyes for long periods of time. The light is good for sterilizing stuff, but remember, our skin is loaded with beneficial bacteria, they are not all bad. We live symbiotically with certain bacteria.
If we start living in a sterile environment it will be bad for us, there are viruses and bacteria all over the place. If it is too sterile, we wind up overreacting when we are exposed to anything or we wind up with an inferior innate immune response to actual pathogenic microbes.
I would not want to have those lights on all day long, but would not feel using a wand in a grocery store while working would be something I would worry about. To me, the cleaning chemicals they use would be probably worse than the UV light.
I find it very odd that they say colloidal silver kills bad bacteria.
some people take a Lot of it. but it does not seem to harm them?
the human bodie is about 70% or more bacteria!
we sun bath and use sun lamps to tan the skin.
we take antibacterial drugs.
should all this kill the 70% bacteria kill us or make us sick?
but Nothing? verry odd.