Removed YouTube video goes viral ... a double switch ?

There's a YouTube removed video of two doctors saying the lockdowns are unnecessary , according to ' their' research . It appeared yesterday . And was duly taken down . This caused it to be virally mirrored and for example fox news' Tucker Carlson had his say about it.

Here's another point of view .


Sorry to say , but those doctors on the removed video are not credible imo . Neither is their research or the conclusion they want to push so hard.

BUT , are you all quite certain that YouTube and the ptb in charge , are not playing a double switch in the game of truth by removing it ?

It already smelt of disinfo , that's one , but it's the mass of misinformed sheep that instantly credit it , that two. Removing it could have been a play to advantage
Why ? They , the consumers of said product , think that because it's banned , it must be true . Because YouTube 'apparently' don't want them to see it , then it must be worth seeing . They think it must have the facts.

In this way , and because it's been mirrored enough to get widespread recognition , maybe YouTube and the ptb know that's what will happen , and suddenly the pink morass which are the noobs at life , let's face it , the commentators at large , are being led up the garden path , and thinking this must be the way.

Sheep are sheep at the end of the day , easy to herd about , IF you know how.

Look at what they've been told , the message was millions of cases , few deaths , mild disease , so it must be nothing to really worry about.

Surely that is , quite possibly , the reverse of the potential facts , except perhaps the millions of cases . The real truth could in fact run as , millions of infections , countdown to symptoms , hospitals over run and mass deaths . Think what the sheep would do then . They'd be running around the field on a blind panic .

So what to do , if that was more like the real scenario , and you don't want THAT getting out ,
is get some disinfo doctors , make a video and then ban it , and let the sheep think they know a thing about why videos get banned . Have them complain and think that they know the truth really , cos they've seen a banned video.
It must be true right ? Because YouTube don't want them to know the REAL truth . It's banned so it must be true , right ? That's what they're thinking ...

It has the effect they settle down , chew the cud , thinking mild disease , lying government , nothing new , no problem . It really honestly could be they should be buying out the shops , tp included , and digging themselves foxholes, whatever they might do , or at least taking it seriously .
It's a pandemic after all , it's not a walk in the park. It really honestly could wipe a shet load of people out .

But because of those ' doctors ' and YouTube banning their disinformation they're now doing what good sheep should be doing , relaxing , after walking through the gate into the fold , instead of - potentially given some ( is it? ) real info - scattered everywhere , bleating in fear.

You can hear them now , laying down bleating fffeeeaaarrmmmooonnnggerrrrerrss , that's to be expected. But we re here to think , and as always , question everything in life.

TPTB are using double-whammies and three-card-monte tricks to confuse the public while executing their plans to re-stabilize world governments to their agendas and keep any successful economies from flourishing 😈

a reply to: DoctorBluechip

This is what your post reminds me of.

a reply to: DoctorBluechip

They are no less credible than the "experts" that the MSM, WHO and so forth roll out. And at least these guys are consistent so far, not changing their story every few days.
:

The CDC and WHO have posted bogus info during this whole thing but yet they are the voice of reason. Remember when they said no masks were needed in early MAR. Total nonsense.

What we need are two swim lanes mandated by Congress. Every social media, internet based co must have a lane for restricted info and once unrestricted. Problem solved. Enough of these monopolies controlling every single source of information like they know everything.

If you are going direct to YouTube for 'credible'....you are already on the wrong path.

This is the land of 60 minute '5 minute crafts' and "monetization is the only deciding factor on everything". Credible was bought out before the platform ever became mainstream.

a reply to: DoctorBluechip

This is part of the censorship crisis.

People on certain sides of the political spectrum are famous for chiding people for being controlled by corporate oligarchs, but they are themselves controlled by an oligarchy of another sort.

If your "experts" don't match mine, you feel justified to become a "Karen" and scold and finger-wag like a sanctimonious little old lady judging others.

Perhaps, they posited, Americans could be moved to reconsider their “understanding” of the First and Fourth Amendments, as “the harms from digital speech” continue to grow, and “the social costs of a relatively open Internet multiply.”

This interesting take on the First Amendment was the latest in a line of “Let’s rethink that whole democracy thing” pieces that began sprouting up in earnest four years ago. Articles with headlines like “Democracies end when they become too democratic” and “Too much of a good thing: why we need less democracy” became common after two events in particular: Donald Trump’s victory in the the Republican primary race, and the decision by British voters to opt out of the EU, i.e. “Brexit.”

A consistent lament in these pieces was the widespread decline in respect for “experts” among the ignorant masses, better known as the people Trump was talking about when he gushed in February 2016, “I love the poorly educated!”

The Atlantic was at the forefront of the argument that The People is a Great Beast, that cannot be trusted to play responsibly with the toys of freedom. A 2016 piece called “American politics has gone insane” pushed a return of the “smoke-filled room” to help save voters from themselves. Author Jonathan Rauch employed a metaphor that is striking in retrospect, describing America’s oft-vilified intellectual and political elite as society’s immune system:

Americans have been busy demonizing and disempowering political professionals and parties, which is like spending decades abusing and attacking your own immune system. Eventually, you will get sick.

There it is -- Don't you see? Corona virus is the kharma for not listening to our elite betters and letting them guide us.

But, of course, you are the good little citizen always listening to your more elite betters and doing what they tell you like the ignorant, unwashed sheep you always were and should remain and never assume you are not.

So what you are saying is that a free and independent press is a danger to society because the consumer makes the decision as to credibility versus the distribution hub of that medium?

Yeah, that does not cause any weight to credibility before researching the presentation...except it does by human nature as often people go to great lengths to hide the truth.

a reply to: DoctorBluechip

also there is this video from CNN where the CEO of youtube says they will listen to the W.H.O and ban things that go against W.H.O So I don't think it is a "Double Switch"

a reply to: ketsuko

You are always so right!! but how do we reverse this censorship crisis? does that article that you linked go into any solutions??

a reply to: American-philosopher

Blockchain...

You just need to handle the porn and other unpleasant aspects, and no one is removing something from the chain, that depends on the others before it!!!

You make everyone a part of the process, when you don't want the process to be manipulated!

originally posted by: Ahabstar
So what you are saying is that a free and independent press is a danger to society because the consumer makes the decision as to credibility versus the distribution hub of that medium?

Yeah, that does not cause any weight to credibility before researching the presentation...except it does by human nature as often people go to great lengths to hide the truth.

YouTube is not:

Free

Independent

Press

It is a multinational corporation. It does what it needs to do to keep it's preferred revenue streams open. Nothing more, nothing less.

a reply to: DoctorBluechip

Counterintel operations are certainly a "thing."

However, they weren't talking about research (if its the vid Im thinking about), they were talking data. Its a bit different, especially in this context.

You already had your preconceived notions going into it, if your posts are any indication, so you were already going to disagree with anyone saying anything differently. Thats pretty normal.

I think they brought up some valid points for consideration though, and I disagreed with other points they made. When something is "banned," I definitely perk up my ears.. But I also am self-aware enough to know I have that reaction.

From what I saw, they were using essentially the same data as everyone else, but they were presenting it differently. That, in and of itself, is exceedingly poignant and relevant when it comes to reactions.

Now though.. The censorship issue is its own animal. And, like many things right now, are longstanding issues that many have been.. persuaded.. to only look at in terms of "The Virus."

I think any corporation or organization that has size, scope, and influence past a certain amount should be restricted by the Constitution (here in the States) just the same as a government.

a reply to: Serdgiam

I think any corporation or organization that has size, scope, and influence past a certain amount should be restricted by the Constitution (here in the States) just the same as a government.

This ∆ is a very good idea.

originally posted by: American-philosopher
a reply to: DoctorBluechip

This is what your post reminds me of.

LOL this is perfect.

Considering the other drivel youtube continues to show, the removal of the doctors' video legitimizes it considerably.
They couldn't discount the numbers because those are common knowledge so they removed the dissenting opinion which as a private company has that right, but it shows their true colors and who their masters are.

a reply to: ketsuko

People on certain sides of the political spectrum are famous for chiding people for being controlled by corporate oligarchs, but they are themselves controlled by an oligarchy of another sort.

Bingo. For some the game is about equity, not equality.

I used to think those with that thought process were in the minority, but now I wonder.

Too many celebrate power in the hands of the few so long as it furthers their agenda. That's broadly speaking, and I'm not specifically pointing to any one group... Unfortunately it's been a tit for tat game that has transcended even politics. Many ideologies have segments who are guilty.

a reply to: ketsuko

Are you calling me an ignorant unwashed sheep lol
Tell you what , there's very few medics or doctors I see as experts in anything much . Often they're only good at meddling around and being overbearing off their titles

I choose who i believe , not on what they say , at first , but what I see in their faces . When I watched that video I saw ' lying disinformation agent ' literally in his eyes , mannerisms, face, clothes, chosen setting etc.
It's funny because I'm very often not wrong . I can spot pedoa too.
When I look at Chris Whitty , UK CMO I see ' serious expert ' for the same reasons , at first , and then I hear what he says and tend to agree. He's been an expert on pandemics and epidemiology for many years.
Maybe the way I judge people on sight is wrong , but it has in fact served me well over many years so I've kept using it as a method. Those jumped up millenials I see are not experts anyway , or trustworthy they are agenda driven liars

a reply to: American-philosopher

When I look at Susan wokjedski I see she and hear she is not the CEO of YouTube she is not in charge of anything like YouTube policy but what she is a fielded frontlady for the real controllers. She is someone who does whatever she is told to all the time. She is there only to announce policy , she makes none of the decisions

a reply to: DoctorBluechip

All goes back to Alphabet Inc!

I do wonder though, if restricting such an organization through the Constitution would affect how they act in another nation, like the UK?

Dont think too many will get behind the idea anyway, but these corporations have vastly more power and influence than most seem to realize..

originally posted by: peck420

originally posted by: Ahabstar
So what you are saying is that a free and independent press is a danger to society because the consumer makes the decision as to credibility versus the distribution hub of that medium?

Yeah, that does not cause any weight to credibility before researching the presentation...except it does by human nature as often people go to great lengths to hide the truth.

YouTube is not:

Free

Independent

Press

It is a multinational corporation. It does what it needs to do to keep it's preferred revenue streams open. Nothing more, nothing less.

And it is GOOGLE as well..and the others they own...