It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Case74282
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand
How many people have to die before it sinks in that this virus is quite deadly....
When there is actual data that supports that (at present) false statement. How can you question people who question death rates that have already been proven multiple times are being intentionally manipulated over and over?
originally posted by: Nyiah
There's over 650,000 people in my county. Only 20 people have died, and there's only 430 cases. That's 1 dead person per over 30,000 residents right there, and 1 case per 1500 people.
That very basic math, with not a whole hell of a lot of people obeying any of her crap edicts to any meaningful degree, equals I don't need "false hope" to see the writing on the wall -- I have higher odds of winning an Oscar, or writing a smash success novel than I do dying from Covid. Hell, those book odds are over 5 times better than just getting the bug itself.
I'm good, Whitmer, thanks. Go play concern troll in Detroit, they MIGHT believe you.
originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: Grimpachi
If you have MORE testing...... you will have MORE positive cases, BUT same amount of deaths.... there by as “info”lurker stated using “basic math” the fatality rate would dwarf its current “inflated” percentage. THUS making the “danger” far less.
originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: chr0naut
Nice folklore reference.... I asked for “factual evidence”
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: Case74282
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: SeektoUnderstand
How many people have to die before it sinks in that this virus is quite deadly....
When there is actual data that supports that (at present) false statement. How can you question people who question death rates that have already been proven multiple times are being intentionally manipulated over and over?
Which side do you fall on, the low number state media run fascist regimes, or places where medical professionals can speak directly to the media and go online to state their numbers?
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: Case74282
Basic math baby.
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
originally posted by: Nyiah
There's over 650,000 people in my county. Only 20 people have died, and there's only 430 cases. That's 1 dead person per over 30,000 residents right there, and 1 case per 1500 people.
That very basic math, with not a whole hell of a lot of people obeying any of her crap edicts to any meaningful degree, equals I don't need "false hope" to see the writing on the wall -- I have higher odds of winning an Oscar, or writing a smash success novel than I do dying from Covid. Hell, those book odds are over 5 times better than just getting the bug itself.
I'm good, Whitmer, thanks. Go play concern troll in Detroit, they MIGHT believe you.
So if i had a bowl with 650,000 pieces of your favorite candy and you knew that 430 of them could kill you or cause various problems for life, would you still eat one?