It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Brotherman
I just found out that this Sunday it is becoming in effect a state law in my home state of PA, requiring us to have to wear masks in public under threat of arrest or something like that. Is this happening everywhere else too? Or is this another Tom Wolfe super ass hole move?
originally posted by: Tarzan the apeman.
a reply to: DBCowboy
A guy at work went home sick and was gone for a little over a week. During that time it was asked if he had Coroney and it was said they can't say due to HIPPA. I don't know if they were pulling our leg or if they were telling the truth.
originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: Brotherman
For the best, yes, one should wear face protection for the time being. And, no, I don't think it was necessary to have a law like that. Common sense tells one to wear a mask these days. But then again, I've posted many times that common sense has gone out the window some time ago.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
www.wtae.com...
triblive.com...
Looks like they're still figuring out what enforcement will entail. Considering that particular governor and his head full of ass, I'd say arrest isn't off the table.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: DBCowboy
Add it to the list, I suppose. Constitutional Rights haven't been even remotely observed in any of this so far, why would they start now? There are US state and municipal government that have literally banned the free exercise of religious rights... certainly never thought I'd see that day happen.
originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: Cobaltic1978
Sorry I didn't post links, my concerns are deeper then just the news so maybe I was being a little jumpy without links.
originally posted by: Phoenix
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: DBCowboy
Add it to the list, I suppose. Constitutional Rights haven't been even remotely observed in any of this so far, why would they start now? There are US state and municipal government that have literally banned the free exercise of religious rights... certainly never thought I'd see that day happen.
Seems to me that many State Governments are leaving themselves wide open to being sued for federal violation of civil liberties under class action type suits as many and several different U.S. Constitutional clauses are unquestionably being violated under State Governor overreach.
Many if not most of the Governors are staunch supporters of Supremacy Clause of U.S. Constitution when the subject at hand fits their agenda but then its all Mr/Mrs States rights at other times.
It cannot be both ways so either we have "Supremacy" or "States Rights" which is it?
The Supreme Court has ruled on this very thing many times and I can say which it is.
They will get sued, lose, and cost state taxpayers additional millions unnecessarily.
1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 9th and 10th amendments come directly to mind.
More at: www.foxbusiness.com...
Its drug Remdesivir, according to Statnews.com, showed effectiveness for treating COVID-19 patients. Shares of Gilead rose over 10 percent in the extended session.
A recent clinical trial of Remdesivir, an antiviral medicine used as a potential treatment for Ebola, found rapid recoveries in coronavirus patients' fever and respiratory symptoms.
The trial, conducted by the University of Chicago Medicine, found nearly all patients who were given daily infusions of Remdesivir were discharged from the hospital in less than a week.