It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In cases like that of the novel coronavirus, for which we have neither an effective treatment nor a vaccine, interventions must go back to the basics, including simply keeping individuals from one another by prohibiting large gatherings, closing schools and asking people to stay at home. The graphic above illustrates the extraordinary effect that the timing of social distancing policies can have on an outbreak’s death toll.
On March 16, the White House issued initial social distancing guidelines, including closing schools and avoiding groups of more than 10. But an estimated 90 percent of the cumulative deaths in the United States from Covid-19, at least from the first wave of the epidemic, might have been prevented by putting social distancing policies into effect two weeks earlier, on March 2, when there were only 11 deaths in the entire country. The effect would have been substantial had the policies been imposed even one week earlier, on March 9, resulting in approximately a 60 percent reduction in deaths.
originally posted by: DanDanDat
In cases like that of the novel coronavirus, for which we have neither an effective treatment nor a vaccine, interventions must go back to the basics, including simply keeping individuals from one another by prohibiting large gatherings, closing schools and asking people to stay at home. The graphic above illustrates the extraordinary effect that the timing of social distancing policies can have on an outbreak’s death toll.
On March 16, the White House issued initial social distancing guidelines, including closing schools and avoiding groups of more than 10. But an estimated 90 percent of the cumulative deaths in the United States from Covid-19, at least from the first wave of the epidemic, might have been prevented by putting social distancing policies into effect two weeks earlier, on March 2, when there were only 11 deaths in the entire country. The effect would have been substantial had the policies been imposed even one week earlier, on March 9, resulting in approximately a 60 percent reduction in deaths.
According to a the New York Times, using models from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation at the University of Washington, estimate that the total US deaths due to COVID-19 would have been 6,000 instead of the current estimate of 60,000 had the white house instituted its social distancing guidelines 2 weeks early than it had.
That calculates to Donald Trump being responsible for an estimated 54,000 deaths through his slow initial reaction.
This will clearly by a sticking point in the upcoming election. Will the American people believe this statistical information or will they instead believe the resulting deaths are largely the fault of circumstance?
www.nytimes.com...
originally posted by: watchandwait410
I blame china... for everything. If they can't study a dangerous virus and keep it contained then don't mess with viruses in the first place.
originally posted by: Edumakated
a reply to: DanDanDat
But how do they reconcile the fact leftist were calling Trump racist / xenophobe when he was shutting down travel from China due to the virus?
originally posted by: watchandwait410
I blame china... for everything. If they can't study a dangerous virus and keep it contained then don't mess with viruses in the first place.
originally posted by: DietWoke
originally posted by: watchandwait410
I blame china... for everything. If they can't study a dangerous virus and keep it contained then don't mess with viruses in the first place.
I thought it came from pangolin chops and batwurst?
originally posted by: visitedbythem
Same people calling Trump a racist for stopping air travel from China first?
How retarded.
originally posted by: Bluntone22
Donald Trump.....
Is there anything this man can't do?
If anyone is blaming the president, then they must also blame governors as well because they could have done things in their own states.