Yup that woman never misses a chance to gum up the gears.
Of course her first sentence is predictable because it’s the same crap she’s been saying since January every time she gets behind a podium or sees
a camera.
She must have this tattooed under her eyelids.
Sadly, as he has since Day One, the President is ignoring global health experts, disregarding science and undermining the heroes fighting on
the frontline, at great risk to the lives and livelihoods of Americans and people around the world,” Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, said in a
statement Tuesday.
While she has all of her constituents hearts pitter patting. With those stern ‘heartfelt’ remarks.
She slides in a bold face lie.
“This decision is dangerous, illegal and will be swiftly challenged,” she added.
No it is not illegal.
Contributions to the world health organization are voluntary that’s how we’ve done it since 1948. But they are headquartered in Switzerland which
makes it a international negotiation. I can’t find any self-executing or non-executing presidential agreements or treaties on the issue. Which is a
moot point because none of those supersede the constitution which is where Trump draws his power.
The President of the United States has sole authority to negotiate ALL foreign matters . Congress and therefore US law have no effect internationally.
Nor does it matter who holds the purse strings . Treaties of cooperation can be made but again the president has sole power over those treaties .
United States versus Curtiss Wright 1936 SCOTUS
Primary Holding
The President has exclusive power over foreign policy and does not need Congress to delegate power to the executive branch in this area
supreme.justia.com...
That’s it plain and simple if Trump wants to fire them he can. ( I like that analogy)
Then this is how the shysters deal from the bottom of the deck while tag teaming you.
A top aide for Democratic Rep. Nita Lowey, House Appropriations Committee chairwoman, said the president does not have the “unilateral
authority” to cut funding, comparing it to the controversial hold on military aid for Ukraine that ultimately led to the last year’s impeachment
proceedings.
Again yes he does have unilateral authority on international matters.
As for mentioning Ukraine they must be planning on going back to the dry well. And picking up the “GAO said he broke the law in Ukraine”. If that
was the case he would’ve been impeached and so would’ve Obama because the GAO cited him with seven violations.
The infraction Trump supposedly committed fell under the impound act of 1974. That in my opinion under international law is null void because of the
case law from the Wright Curtis Supreme Court decision in 1936.
He didn’t properly notify Congress was the accused violation. That’s a I he dotted right away this time. When stating his decision is under
review. The funds have to be held by Congress for 45 days before they can be permanently rescinded.
Impound control act
If you guys want to check me. This is the best source gives explanation insights all of the caselaw.
Treaty law
If my cynicism seemed a bit strong.
You should’ve seen this before my edits. Lol
edit on 15-4-2020 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-4-2020 by
Fallingdown because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-4-2020 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)
edit on 15-4-2020
by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)