It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"Even if there was evidence that these high frequency radio signals were somehow hazardous to human health that does not equate to being a cause for this pandemic... "
Allowing wireless equipment on its streetlamps isn’t something new for New York City. It’s been allowing this for 15 years. The effort has resulted in nearly 6,000 pole installations — with 5,000 more in the pipeline — by franchisees throughout the five boroughs.
There appears to be a correlation since recorded history between both solar maximums and minimums and major worldwide pandemics.
This analysis examined several past analyses that purported to show a statistically significant connection between sunspot activity and the timing of influenza pandemics. In all cases, the analyses either had mis-transcriptions of the dates of influenza pandemics listed in the literature, and/or made mistakes in the statistical analyses, and/or the analyses were not robust to arbitrary assumptions made to select the data, or the metrics used to assess the relationship between sunspot activity and the timing of influenza pandemics. In all cases, correcting these issues resulted in concluding that no significant relationship is apparent.
There's also a correlation with the roll out of major electromagnet effecting technologies like electricity, radio, radar, etc.
There is no evidence for either one of these things.
Point is the solar minimum is mutating and activating this world wide, while 5G might have started it earlier in Wuhan.
originally posted by: saladfingers123456
a reply to: Jimy718
But after all that you said, and the general dismissal that seems to come over, are you saying you know more than the 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields?
Does what they say mean nothing to you? You know better? Sorry if I have got you wrong.
But you don't think that, if you were one of the people living next to where the broadcast point is, that the accumulative effect would take its toll? Would you live next it? What would you expect if you did? Nothing? A perfectly healthy life?
But of course, there has been minimal (publicly available at least) testing, so despite the 240 scientists saying "there is clearly a problem" we have no idea the exact effects.
A cell phone????? I'm far less concerned about cell phones... I am concerned about the towers, the drums, the dishes, the antennas. This is what I would assume and hope any papers on this subject are referring to the most, not cell phones.
You don't have to look very hard for a video of people measuring the output power of newly installed 5g towers. The energy spikes seem pretty real even at distance.
At the end of the day, I'm talking about people (some more than others) having prolonged constant direct exposure... every 200 meters... and with no idea about the quality of the equipment being used nor how safe it is.
Would you have one pointed at your house and sleep in comfort? Happy to have them installed in schools?
The space I live in now was actually built as a Faraday cage, even though Ive since stopped my work/research (wellll.. mostly ;P).