It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: chr0naut
That's believing their figures. You cant because they lie.
What about all the other countries?
You can pretend it is all lies, but that is denying the overall picture of scientific and medical data from thousands of researchers across the planet.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
Another unintended consequence, if one wishes to read the exact text linked above, is that anyone who tests positive for the WuFlu is required to stay at home with no exceptions other than emergency medical care for 14 days. That's right; get a positive on a test, and you are immediately a prisoner in your own home. Out of food? Too damn bad, stay at home! Some kid throws a baseball through a window? Sorry, Charlie, just live with the draft while you're recovering. House burns down? Well, you can either burn with it or you can get a ticket for violating your Shelter in Place Order. Now, under these restrictions, would anyone actually want to get a test? I know I will fight it tooth and nail! I don't think I have the WuFlu, but what if the test gives a false positive or I actually have it asymptomatically? I'm screwed! So there won't be many tests in Alabama, at least not voluntary, and we won't know if the WuFlu is widespread or not.
TheRedneck
Despite Governor Andy Beshear ordering all Kentucky residents to stay at home to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus, some in Louisville are reportedly refusing to self-quarantine.
As a response, Jefferson Circuit Court judge Angela Bisig is ordering ankle monitors for those who were exposed to the coronavirus but who won’t stay at home.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: chr0naut
That's believing their figures. You cant because they lie.
What about all the other countries?
You can pretend it is all lies, but that is denying the overall picture of scientific and medical data from thousands of researchers across the planet.
"You can pretend it is all lies, but that is denying the overall picture of scientific and medical data from thousands of researchers across the planet."-you said
And you're pretending it isn't all lies.
1st Responder
What planer did you buy? I am thinking of getting one in the future. I was looking at the Dewalt.
However, people with good intentions are trying to figure out how to best keep things running as efficiently as possible for as many as possible in these unique and trying times.
By the time my symptoms force me there, I may require hospitalization meaning if they do test me, they're getting a sample of the worst part of the illness, not any of the rest.
That response, involving the slaughter of more than 11 million sheep and cattle at a cost of more than £8bn was based entirely on modelling and remains hugely controversial — with many believing the modellers got it wrong. They were modelling a fast-moving epidemic with little accurate data. A subsequent government inquiry was damning of the general approach and its conclusions may be relevant to the current crisis. It said: “The FMD epidemic in UK in 2001 was the first situation in which models were developed in the ‘heat’ of an epidemic and used to guide control policy . . . analyses of the field data, suggest that the culling policy may not have been necessary to control the epidemic, as was suggested by the models produced within the first month of the epidemic. If so it must be concluded that the models supporting this decision were inherently invalid.”
The Imperial modellers’ next big public challenge came eight years later when swine flu swept the world — fortunately killing few Britons because older people tended to be immune and younger ones were strong enough to fight it off. Britain was, however, left with 34 million doses of unused and expensive vaccines. Again there was an inquiry — which concluded that ministers had once again treated modellers as “astrologers”, asking them to provide detailed forecasts when they had too little data.
“Modelling did not provide early answers,” it concluded. “The major difficulty with producing accurate models was the lack of a relatively accurate idea of the total number of cases . . . This is not to reject the use of models, but to understand their limitations: modellers are not ‘court astrologers’.”
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: chr0naut
In my 45+ year career? And 20 in a University Medical Center?
That doesnt even warrant the 3 sentences I bother to reply with...
And SUPER inconvenient, if not impossible, for anyone with any kind of physical impairment.
I keep waiting for the massive manufacturing capability we have on the individual level to be leveraged in this time.. 3D printers, CNC, even made a thread detailing a housing structure that uses all these things (my life's work, up until a couple years ago).
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: chr0naut
In my 45+ year career? And 20 in a University Medical Center?
That doesnt even warrant the 3 sentences I bother to reply with...
No way I could have known that.
Apologies.