It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Yes. Nor does it include those who die at home, undiagnosed.
originally posted by: FauxMulder
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Yes. Nor does it include those who die at home, undiagnosed.
So if someone dies at home they are not being tested postmortem?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: daskakik
It is currently at 2.8%. It was at 0.3% 2 weeks ago so that can't be it.
I think the data is extremely flawed, it doesn't factor in people who had it and either didn't get tested or were asymptomatic.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Here, numbers are being used to create fear.
Totally and I'm not falling for it.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: daskakik
It is currently at 2.8%. It was at 0.3% 2 weeks ago so that can't be it.
I think the data is extremely flawed, it doesn't factor in people who had it and either didn't get tested or were asymptomatic.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: FauxMulder
Hard to say. Testing being such as it is, I have no reason to expect so.
But with so many living who aren't being tested, the only numbers that actually count right now are those who are being hospitalized and using public health resources. The CFR as used, is a distraction.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: burdman30ott6
As in, cause of death: pneumonia
Something like that?