It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Senate Will Call Whistleblower to Testify

page: 1
42
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+22 more 
posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:11 PM
link   
Who says we can't predict earthquakes ?....This is gonna shake the land.


According to Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, the Senate Intelligence Committee plans on calling in the Ukraine whistleblower who was responsible for sparking the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump.

The committee will investigate how the whistleblower, who is allegedly a CIA analyst, was able to get the alleged information of the call and how he took that information to the intelligence community's inspector general. This implicates far-left Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff considering multiple reports state that Schiff's office had been in contact with the whistleblower and knew their claims.


Grab something democrats !

trendingpolitics.com...



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

I have no idea why this game is going on when every so called "witness" that the corrupt house called already stated that they are not aware of ANY impeachable offence.

What a waste of time.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Maybe this is to bust Col. Vindaloo/Vinmann or whatever his name is as the original leaker.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Why wouldn't they question the Director of National Intelligence and the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, who okayed the complaint and pushed it through to the House Intelligence Committee, about these issues? Or even ask Bill Barr, who got the complaint first and dismissed it, refused to investigate it, about the hows and whys of the actual whistle blower complaint, before putting the whistleblower person's life at further risk?

edit on 3-2-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)


+4 more 
posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: Trueman
I have no idea why this game is going on when every so called "witness" that the corrupt house called already stated that they are not aware of ANY impeachable offence.
What a waste of time.


Not a waste of time If they get Schiff, Pelosi or Hillary. Just one scumbag.


+3 more 
posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Trueman
Maybe this is to bust Col. Vindaloo/Vinmann or whatever his name is as the original leaker.


All I can tell you is that guy will sing like Pavarotti. They're not going for the middleman. We can't let those idiots treat the President like they did. No F# way.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Trueman
Why wouldn't they question the Director of Intelligence and the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, who okayed the complaint and pushed it through to the House Intelligence Committee, about these issues? Or even ask Bill Barr, who got the complaint first and dismissed it, refused to investigate it, about the hows and whys of the actual whistle blower complaint, before putting the whistleblower person's life at further risk?


We don't know if they will or won't do that.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:30 PM
link   
would be really really great
imho
to finally nail some of these deep-state leftist scum constantly submarining the country

I can just imagine the self-righteous posturing which will ensue


+2 more 
posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

It’s the mindset of the perennial beurocrat. They think they run things as elected officials come and go.

Arrogant paper-pushers in my humble.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

Well, they're the ones who know how the whistle blower got their info, who the providers of the info were, reviewed and okayed the complaint, passing it along to the House Intelligence Committee. In Bill Barrs case, he dismissed the compliant, but knows all the ins and outs of the hows the whys of the complaint. Ask him.

The whistleblower went through predetermined channels. It's not their fault what happened after they filed their complaint.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

So NOW the Senate Republicans a-holes want "witnesses?"

Ok.

All they are are Trump minions and sycophants who care more about their power and their party than they do about the oath they took to the Constitution.

Shameful. Despicable. Disgusting.

Nice knowing ya, America.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:38 PM
link   
If this is true, you don't call a witness unless you know their testimony is going to help you burn somebody big...


+1 more 
posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:43 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Why the assumption that their life is at risk? Unless they have dirt on a certain couple from Arkansas the whistleblower will be fine.


+3 more 
posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha


The whistleblower went through predetermined channels. It's not their fault what happened after they filed their complaint.



It is possible to perform illegal acts using legal channels, hell, it’s almost a requirement in DC


+1 more 
posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: Trueman

So NOW the Senate Republicans a-holes want "witnesses?"

Ok.

All they are are Trump minions and sycophants who care more about their power and their party than they do about the oath they took to the Constitution.

Shameful. Despicable. Disgusting.

Nice knowing ya, America.
😭😭😭🤧



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Hypntick




Why the assumption that their life is at risk?


Why? Because our president called the whistle blower a "traitor", and called for all of the people who "leaked" the info the whistle blower included in the complaint to be punished the way traitors used to be punished, which was death by firing squad or public hanging.


edit on 3-2-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Trueman

They are the Senate! Are you sure they need to call witnesses?




posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 06:59 PM
link   
The testimony



Like, once, I met this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy, who knew this guy's cousin--

(Spongebob)



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 07:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Sookiechacha


The whistleblower went through predetermined channels. It's not their fault what happened after they filed their complaint.



It is possible to perform illegal acts using legal channels, hell, it’s almost a requirement in DC


Again, that would be on the DNI and the IGIC.



posted on Feb, 3 2020 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Trueman

Maybe this is to bust Col. Vindaloo/Vinmann or whatever his name is as the original leaker.


It is Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman. CIA, a highly decorated serviceman detailed to the White House...carry on unless you have a problem with truth.



new topics

top topics



 
42
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join