The Queen and Trump ~ Brexit Buddies & 4-D Chess Masters

a reply to: alldaylong
Wasn't Cameron PM during the events that led to Brexit?

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Prince Andrew is looking awfully suspicious regarding the Epstein case. The whole pedophile elite (including the royals) conspiracy is looking to be more of a reality these days.

No sh1t...

a reply to: daskakik

Cameron called The EU Referendum. He campaigned to remain.

When the result went against his wishes he resigned the day after the result was announced.

David Cameron has resigned, bringing an abrupt end to his six-year premiership, after the British public took the momentous decision to reject his entreaties and turn their back on the European Union

www.theguardian.com...

a reply to: alldaylong

So that is a yes.

Just because he resigned over the results doesn't mean he wasn't there during the referendum.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: alldaylong

So that is a yes.

Just because he resigned over the results doesn't mean he wasn't there during the referendum.

Of course he was there during the referendum.

He wasn't there during any of the time the negotiations where taking place between The UK and EU on Britain leaving.

Do you understand that ?

a reply to: alldaylong

Not at all. Unless you would like to explain why you think that ?

He was still involved, and was still a PM.

Japan is a fully independent country. Unless you can show me that it's not.

Their largest industries are agrarian based and niche manufacturing. Yet their GDP is almost half the US. Makes you think really... something, something banking, control of central bank implemented during the US intervention and arms deals in the late 1800s, and finalized after occupation after WW2.

Key term(s) is banks and military positions.

a reply to: strongfp

He was still involved, and was still a PM.

He was involved with Zero negotiations with taking The UK out of The EU.

None, zilch zero.

a reply to: alldaylong

I understand that but the referendum was a pretty important part of the whole thing and he was there for that.

Why is it so hard to just say, yeah, he was part of it, even if he wanted a different outcome?

Your Queen is an elegant lady. The pictures certainly are worth 1,000 words. If you can't see the friendship and trust between them, you are blind.
Hold on Brits.
You have friends across the pond and,
God save your Queen.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: alldaylong

I understand that but the referendum was a pretty important part of the whole thing and he was there for that.

Why is it so hard to just say, yeah, he was part of it, even if he wanted a different outcome?

I think you are getting confused. Here is the original remark i was replying to.

, of course they didn't want you to leave. But it took three PMs to get it done

Cameron had zero input into " getting it done" He had already resigned.

Am i getting through ?

a reply to: CharlesT

Either that.. or...

She is also the highest level AND longest trained diplomat in the Galaxy!

Anyway, the recent developments are giving me a little hope!

a reply to: alldaylong

You're making arguments for arguments sake ... He allowed or I guess called for the vote. That's not a small deal type thing, it's a pretty big deal. And he couldn't cope with the results or the outcome. Understandable, considering it's not the direction he want his nation to go towards. Any person with honor or conceding sane thoughts would do the same thing.

Pontius Pilate syndrome I guess.

a reply to: alldaylong
The referendum opened the door and he was there for that.

The statement didn't say he had any input into the negotiations. It simply states that 3 PMs were there while the process carried on.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: alldaylong
The referendum opened the door and he was there for that.

The statement didn't say he had any input into the negotiations. It simply states that 3 PMs were there while the process carried on.

If it makes you happy then ok your right.

Facepalm

a reply to: alldaylong

Point out where in that statement it says Cameron took part in the negotiations.

Fake facepalm all you want, you went off half-cocked.

a reply to: daskakik

Let me take this nice and slow for you.

The UK knew we would leave on the night of the referendum result. Ok ?

Cameron left office the next morning. Ok ?

And then we had this comment posted earlier.

of course they didn't want you to leave. But it took three PMs to get it done

" To Leave " took two PM's not three. Cameron had Goneeeeeeeeeeeeee

Jesus wept.

a reply to: alldaylong
I have to S&F you here.

Snagged that fly ball, did ya?

No! It was a popup.

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: alldaylong
The referendum opened the door and he was there for that.

The statement didn't say he had any input into the negotiations. It simply states that 3 PMs were there while the process carried on.

He might have opened the door ...... he didn't enter ....he left

BEFORE the Brexit Process began.

So he wasn't there for ANY of the process!

a reply to: alldaylong
He was PM when the call for the referendum took place. Referendums don't happen overnight.

If the referendum had not happened where would you be?

Set your ego aside and see the statement for what it really was.

a reply to: eletheia

Opening the door is also part of the process.