Feinstein leans toward acquitting Trump

originally posted by: StallionDuck

originally posted by: Blaine91555
She already walked it back and says the L.A. Times got it wrong. She's voting to remove him.

“Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge,” Feinstein said Tuesday, after the president’s team finished a three-day presentation in his defense. “That was my view and it still is my view.”

I'm baffled how she denies that meant what it obviously meant. She must have been ordered to walk it back by someone.

Maybe so. I went back to the article and noticed it grew some. Maybe I'm imagining it or it really did get edited. I don't recall seeing that response but sure enough it's there now.

For what it's worth, that happens here a lot too.

Just saying...

a reply to: carewemust

She also concealed carried when it was absolutely illegal in California prior to becoming Mayor of San Francisco after the Mayor was assassinated in his office with Harvey Milk and she was the first on the scene...but I am sure the two facts are unrelated.

originally posted by: Gargoyle91
a reply to: StallionDuck

From what I hear the Democrats are about to get opened up on in ways they do not want .

Don't count on it, I don't believe justice will ever be served.

She's finished with what?

a reply to: StallionDuck

Well maybe it had something to do with a knee jerk reaction to the Trump international..er, family, and settlements etc announcements.
Then another knee jerk on reflection, when it actually didn't seem so good at all at all.

originally posted by: Gargoyle91
a reply to: StallionDuck

From what I hear the Democrats are about to get opened up on in ways they do not want .

Yeah, where did you hear that? Here? LOL!

a reply to: StallionDuck

Top Harvard scientist just perp walked for being a Chinese asset.

Maybe that was a warning to Feinstein.

a reply to: StallionDuck

I happen to actually know something about her (personally), and this is not surprising in the least.

That is all.

Silly rabbits...if you think, even for one moment, that politicians like these people practice what they preach...you are so so sorely mistaken it is incomprehensible!!!

At their level, there is no red and blue...NONE!

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
Most Americans vote at the ballot box based on the economy (I don't think it's better for the normal person per say, but that's another topic). Most would say the economy is on the up and up, so they lose unless they quit this and run a campaign.

Once most Americans realize that it's entirely on loan... and even then, designed to serve the 1% first (and a tad more than foremost), they may think a little differently. Luckily for Trump he's got a solid base that forgot all about being fiscally conservative. Another once mighty pillar of conservatism, now relegated to the Republican museum of amnesia.

originally posted by: zardust
a reply to: StallionDuck

Top Harvard scientist just perp walked for being a Chinese asset.

Maybe that was a warning to Feinstein.

Where/when was this?

Can you post a source or link or two?

Thanks.

originally posted by: Guyfriday
This decision of hers makes a lot of sense for the older Dems that aren't all "Socialist". If the older Dems want to stay relevant enough to continue getting elected they need to push out the socialist dems, and currently they can't, but Trump can and she knows that.

From my understanding the S/T crowd has caused a real burden on the older rank and file Democrats, and without a grade-A controller like George Bush sr at the helm their best bet was to lay low. This wasn't in the playbook for people like Soros, HRC, and the S/T crowd that's why we're watching them get exposed so quickly under Trump. People like Feinstein understand this and have chosen to lay low so that they can survive the legal onslaught that's coming for the group.

Sorry, can't keep up with all the new acronyms and their undefined presentation. What is an "S/T Crowd?"

a reply to: dogstar23

Synarchist/Trotskyists. Since there are DNC, RNC, and non-nationals involved a better name was needed. They do seem to be running off of the Synarchist ideology but they are using a Trotskyist methiod to force the ideology on the public. Hence the name "Synarchist/Trotskyists" or S/T for short.

a reply to: Ahabstar

Diane Feinstein is a gangster. Did you see the photo of her leaning on Senator Lisa Murkowski in the hallway during the Judge Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation hearing? Murkowski looked to be almost in tears. Not sure if it was Feinstein's words, or breath, or both. But she was clearly scared.

Maybe she feels safer keeping Trump and Barr
out of the Biden's dirty laundry.

Which could lead to her own dirty pile...

Just a wild guess since she had that
driver and all....

a reply to: burntheships
In addition to Diane Feinstein, Moderate Democratic Sens. Joe Manchin, Doug Jones, and Kyrsten Sinema were all weighing votes to acquit Trump.

Source: www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: Steveogold
a reply to: CriticalStinker

not sure how to post link daily mail article hillary saying she really tempted to run and would beat trump easy

Isn't it too late to get on some, most, or all state ballots?

I remember reading about Bloomberg having to goto Arkansas or Alabama on the last day or close to the deadline to get put on it.

a reply to: okrian

Once most Americans realize that it's entirely on loan... and even then, designed to serve the 1% first

Only half of Americans even vote in presidentials... So when I said they vote on the economy, I meant vote on how they're told the economy is doing.

But I agree this is just borrowed money an time. Also, the metrics used to prove its a great economy are better metrics for elites than Middle class.

originally posted by: Blaine91555
She already walked it back and says the L.A. Times got it wrong. She's voting to remove him.

“Nine months left to go, the people should judge. We are a republic, we are based on the will of the people — the people should judge,” Feinstein said Tuesday, after the president’s team finished a three-day presentation in his defense. “That was my view and it still is my view.”

I'm baffled how she denies that meant what it obviously meant. She must have been ordered to walk it back by someone.

"What I meant was, we aren't a republic, we aren't based on the will of the people, and the people shouldn't judge! Sorry!"

a reply to: StallionDuck

What? Someone finally clean the *bleep* out of their ears and realize it's political suicide to continue down this path of impeachment?

I'm looking forward to who's going to follow.