It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
I thought it was because he broke federal election laws, obstruction of justice, and his oath of office with the quid pro quo with the Ukraine.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Maybe not. But the Founding Fathers could, and that's why they added impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors to Constitution, as a remedy for a president who would use foreign entanglements to undermine the integrity of our elections.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: network dude
The Articles of impeachment include 2 high crimes, obstruction of Congress
and abuse of power.
Did Bill Clinton commit a high crime or misdemeanor?
originally posted by: network dude
And my answer is no. You can re-read what I wrote and try to extrapolate why you should have already known that.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: tanstaafl
Is perjury a crime?
Is violating the Impound Control Act a violation of the law and the oath to uphold the law that the President took when he was inaugurated?
Is soliciting a foreign agent for election aid a federal crime?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: tanstaafl
Is perjury a crime?
Is violating the Impound Control Act a violation of the law and the oath to uphold the law that the President took when he was inaugurated?
Is soliciting a foreign agent for election aid a federal crime?
No, that law applies to domestic funding.
originally posted by: dfnj2015
originally posted by: network dude
Adam Schiff told the world that Trump will steal the 2020 elections, and that is why he must be removed.
I thought it was because he broke federal election laws, obstruction of justice, and his oath of office with the quid pro quo with the Ukraine.
originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: xuenchen
What transcipt? You mean the non verbatim document realeased that clearly states 'not a transcript'?
Maybe youve got access to documents noone else haas seen yet?
originally posted by: sunkuong
a reply to: xuenchen
What transcipt? You mean the non verbatim document realeased that clearly states 'not a transcript'?
Maybe youve got access to documents noone else haas seen yet?