It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: M4ngo
Kinda weird, no doubt, but it looks like he only raised about $7k through the go fund me account. Plus, he was only in 2nd grade when she disappeared.
I think he was inspired originally by trying to get the $75,000 reward (may still be, don't know if it's still valid).
originally posted by: Wildbob77
Third, perhaps they have a confession of a serial killer but no remains and are looking.
originally posted by: bastion
Odd story indeed.
Can see three main possibilities
1) The FBI conversation never and the mother made it up (seem bizzare unethical, unprofessional statements to make).
2) The daughter may have been found alive but is deeply traumatized or similar, the FBI were giving the family a hint they may want to go somewhere secluded to meet up with her in private and spokesperson appointment was so they could spend much needed time together and not have press intruding into grief/a traumatized victim.
3) It's bad news so tragic that they've been advised to go somewhere private to grieve and leave the spokesperson to deal with the press.
Odd the family seem to have actively approached the press with the news, rather than follow the advice of seasoned professionals (but don't know the context/history of the case).
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: MissSmartypants
What, are you suggesting I just made the OP up??? LOL!!
You did see that I cited a MSM source, and others have cited other MSM sources as well, correct?
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: MissSmartypants
What, are you suggesting I just made the OP up??? LOL!!
You did see that I cited a MSM source, and others have cited other MSM sources as well, correct?
Every account I've read says that "the mother" says the FBI said...and not that "the FBI" has said. There's a difference
originally posted by: M4ngo
originally posted by: MissSmartypants
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: MissSmartypants
What, are you suggesting I just made the OP up??? LOL!!
You did see that I cited a MSM source, and others have cited other MSM sources as well, correct?
Every account I've read says that "the mother" says the FBI said...and not that "the FBI" has said. There's a difference
Exactly. Which leads me to believe the FBI, in fact, never said anything.
Does this seriously sound like standard FBI operating procedure? Not to me.
Who exactly in the FBI said it? Which department in the FBI? Which FBI (location)?
Sounds more like a hoax to me, IMO.
What’s worse is that none of the MSM outlets have confirmed the story with the FBI, yet they run the story anyway like it’s fact.
Good points.
Based on your knowledge of this - what are your thoughts?
It really is *strange* to say the least...n'est pas?
originally posted by: Skeletonized
I'm well into reading up on the case here. So far, Paul Flores does seem like the No.1 suspect.
I'm also intrigued by the fact that Paul called his father that night, and that Paul's mother had made the off-hand remark that the father had exited the house like a bat out of hell right after the phone call. Later, it was reported that they had poured some cement in the back yard. Both Paul's and Kristin's dorm rooms were ordered to be cleaned, and the stolen golf cart belonging to the University was ordered to be cleaned as well. The manager had taken over the task himself and started soaping the thing. Even though other students claim they took the cart, I can't help but see a picture here mentioned in the link about the school trying to protect its reputation.
- Paul was drunk and followed Kristin home that night. The day after, he has a black eye and scrape marks on his knees. He changes the stories for why he got them.
- Paul's father races out the door that night and pours concrete in his yard at a later date.
- The university police seem sloppy and somewhat uncooperative.
Lots of details though, and I still have more to read, but so far I'm leaning towards Paul being not so innocent and his father covering for him.
Edit
Reading on.
"Even though Paul’s room had been sanitized by the dorm cleaning crews, cadaver dogs were taken to Santa Lucia Hall. Dog handlers were not told specifics of the case and escorted their dogs through the dormitory, one at a time. Each of the dogs independently alerted at the door of room number 128, the dorm room belonging to Paul Flores. They alerted, by barking and scratching. “She about broke her neck,” is how one handler described her dog’s alert on room #128. Once inside, each dog alerted independently at three specific areas: the edge of a bed where Paul slept, a wastepaper basket, and the telephone.
HARD FACT: police cadaver dogs each alerted independently on the scent of human remains in the room belonging to Paul Flores."
Hmm.
originally posted by: Skeletonized
a reply to: M4ngo
It does. This was at one of their homes, which was used as a rental at the time I believe.
"Concrete was poured behind the East Branch St. home two days after Kristin disappeared, and before Paul Flores was considered a person of interest. Once again, moving at the speed of light, the police obtained a search warrant to search a home on East Branch Street in Arroyo Grande belonging to the Flores family.
Why this search took four years is a still a mystery. No tip came in at that time which would suddenly prompt a search at the East Branch Street location, and the evidence police used to obtain the warrant was available within days after Kristin disappeared. Was this just another contrived search to ensure that nothing substantial would be revealed?
The yard was never excavated, because according to the Sheriff’s Department, the warrant was too narrowly written to allow for them to dig up the yard. Retired FBI agent, Jack Schafer, who wrote the search warrant, had extensive experience doing so for the FBI. Schafer strongly disagreed explaining, “The first warrant authorized a dig. I know this because I provided most of the information for the warrant. I forced the warrant on a skeptical police force. I was told that the officers present did not want to pay to have the concrete repaired if the search turned up nothing. That was a lost opportunity.”
Edit:
I want to add another tidbit.
"November 14, 1997 – James Murphy, attorney for the Smart family filed a wrongful death suit against Paul Flores. On 11/14/97, approximately eighteen months after Kristin vanished, a deposition was held. Midway through the deposition, the opposing parties took a break. Kristin’s mother, Denise Smart, was overcome with grief and found a vacant conference room in which to sob openly. After finding a place to be alone, she began to weep uncontrollably. The harsh realization that her daughter was indeed gone forever enveloped her soul.
Paul’s father, Ruben Flores, followed her and opened the door to the conference room where Denise was sobbing. Ruben Flores stared at her for a moment, smiled, and he began to laugh, before walking out of the conference room."
Is this for real? If it talks like a coverup, and walks as a coverup...