It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Impeachment Thread

page: 19
26
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: proximo

I saw that, when did Graham and Cruz talk about it? I didn't see that.



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: proximo

I saw that, when did Graham and Cruz talk about it? I didn't see that.


They asked the question - if you listen it tells you who is asking each question.



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:23 PM
link   
So Send Schummer invited Lev Parnes to be a guest today in the Gallery. He had to be escorted out due to his Court Mandated Ankle monitoring bracelet.

Those Dems are soooo good at 4D Chess!


(post by shooterbrody removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
So Send Schummer invited Lev Parnes to be a guest today in the Gallery. He had to be escorted out due to his Court Mandated Ankle monitoring bracelet.

Those Dems are soooo good at 4D Chess!



*giggles* Really?

Dems are so embarassing


(post by toolgal462 removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: toolgal462

originally posted by: proximo
Thank you Graham and Cruz.

At least they are pointing out Schiffs deception about the Romney example.


where? when?


The last question - they just asked Schiff if In his example if Romney's son was making a million dollars a year for a corrupt company in the country he was the point man on would that be valid for investigation

Schiff deflected impressively, and went to his talking points.


He completely avoided answering the question. He basically repurposed the question into those talking points without ever answering it. I think they did that on purpose to show the Senate that there is a double standard that Schiff and the House don't want to admit to.

Now Nadler is talking about Executive privilege and suggesting the President waived his right by commenting on Bolton's comments and never claimed Executive privilege. He's also saying that the Obstruction was exemplified by the President openly stating that he would not comply with any subpoenas. That, to me, is a pissed off man who is being accused of something he didn't do using his legislative power as the Executive to make the House do the work.

The fact that the subpoenas didn't have teeth because of the lack of a House vote, and using that as the basis for Obstruction is the most absurd thing I've ever heard. That sets such a dangerous precedent if anyone in the House, any Committee, could subpoena whoever they want whenever the want and the Executive has to comply? Hell no. I would have said the same thing the President said.

Now I understand why Trump begged to be impeached.

~Namaste



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: proximo

originally posted by: toolgal462
a reply to: proximo

I saw that, when did Graham and Cruz talk about it? I didn't see that.



They asked the question - if you listen it tells you who is asking each question.


Okay, I misunderstood you. Now I get it. Thanks



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:40 PM
link   



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: pavil
a reply to: toolgal462

Ted Cruz Twitter





LOL!!!!

They might as well have invited a convicted a serial rapist to a sorority party!

That makes Schumer look like a real douche to the American public... why would you invite someone that is a criminal that Schiff was already caught lying and mischaracterizing his "documents" to the most important and most prestigious event in modern political history?

I would bring treason charges against all of these people... I hope Barr and Durham bring the hammer of Thor down on the whole cabal, that would be the most rewarding moment I could ask for.

~Namaste



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 02:58 PM
link   
Senators and counsel from both sides making a total mockery of the questions session.
It's simply planted questions by each side asking their own side and providing a further soap box to add to the opening statements.



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 03:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
Senators and counsel from both sides making a total mockery of the questions session.
It's simply planted questions by each side asking their own side and providing a further soap box to add to the opening statements.




Yes..... Just as good as Congress when they question someone.

I bet the Senators hate that they can't say the questions themselves. Never met a Politican who wasn't in Love with their own voice or their own 5 Minutes of Fame.


I'm missing my " Spartacus" or "That little girl was me" moments.



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 03:21 PM
link   
Schiff just said he's not interested in asking John Bolton any questions about other countries and aid given to them... JUST UKRAINE. Why not?

Because they are covering up something in Ukraine and want to take the attention away, IMO.

~Namaste



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 03:22 PM
link   
Oh
Whistleblower questions
Ig pokes his head up



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 03:26 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

White House lawyers just said The Whistleblower story has quite a few holes in it. And it goes to the heart of what started this impeachment process.

That is why I want to see Witnesses. Shred the whistleblower and the house impeachment is nullified like it never happened.



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Oh
Whistleblower questions
Ig pokes his head up


BOOM..

mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 03:29 PM
link   
OK, just got back... not gonna respond to everyone (too many) but thank you for catching me up to date!

I just wish I could have seen Parnas ejected... that had to be hilarious!

TheRedneck



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 03:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: shooterbrody

White House lawyers just said The Whistleblower story has quite a few holes in it. And it goes to the heart of what started this impeachment process.

That is why I want to see Witnesses. Shred the whistleblower and the house impeachment is nullified like it never happened.


Finish the impeachment bs then burn the whistleblower.
Imo



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 04:12 PM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

Confirmed!

www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Jan, 29 2020 @ 04:50 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Ten lashes with a wet noodle for making me look at that thread... no, I have a better idea! Ten hours of listening to Adam Schiff talk about how airtight his impeachment case is.

TheRedneck



new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join