Is Iran still looking to retaliate?

Does Iran follow the Geneva convention rules of war?

I feel Iran if they could would enlist sleeper cells to engage in terrorism.

And countries with the possibility to do this should be dealt with accordingly?

originally posted by: Bloodworth
Does Iran follow the Geneva convention rules of war?

I feel Iran if they could would enlist sleeper cells to engage in terrorism.

And countries with the possibility to do this should be dealt with accordingly?

Not if TPTB allow it to happen on purpose.

a reply to: Bloodworth

Iran so far away.

I Just Iran all night an day.

Couldn't get away.

Iran is a peace-loving nation, non-terrorist.

Probably some sleeper peace cells, I mean thats what Soleimoni(somethinglikethat) liked to do, spread the peace.

Unfortunately he cannot be reached for comment.

a reply to: Bloodworth

If I were Iran right about now I'd be a bit more worried about shooting down a civilian plane and the citizens rising up. The last thing they need is more scrutiny if they want their current regime to stay in power.

a reply to: Bloodworth

Iran is a known sponsor of terrorism and already does exactly that. This is nothing new.

a reply to: Bloodworth

They have been retaliating since 1979.

This isn't exactly new.

They are the largest state-funded terrorist country on the planet.

Nothing is going to "change" there until the people of Iran take thier country back.

And we remember that when they do, to not try to screw it all up again like we did last time.

a reply to: Lumenari

It's hard to get your contry back when all the able body men ran away to europe.

a reply to: Lysergic

Cause of death: Let's just call it "overwhelming physical trauma."

originally posted by: Bloodworth
I feel Iran if they could would enlist sleeper cells to engage in terrorism.

I Pity the Fool in Iran that tries that under Trump's watch. It won't end well for the Mullahs if they try that. The days of "It wasn't us, it was just our proxies" doesn't fly any more. I think Soleimani's death should make that painfully obvious to even the worst Revolutionary Guard Leader.

Iran is a pressure cooker. The theocracy is incompatible with the rest of the planet like most theocracies. It's going implode at some point. When that happens look out. More refugees.

I say screw it. When they implode migrant over there while they are fleeing. Go rebuilt Syria, Iran, Iraq, Saudi. Proliferate western civilization. Germans should head over to Syria. Their world is gone. Go rebuild it in Syria. Let them have Germany. They will find out eventually fleeing their situation was never the real problem.

a reply to: Lumenari

This is the biggest far cry us 'western folk' have against other nations around the world; "just let the people decide and break free from oppression".

Yea it doesn't really work like that. The mindset you are bringing forth is the classic neo liberal agenda, bring 'liberal democracy' to nations that have not developed it.

OK, why not go bring a big dose of democracy to places like Vietnam? Did your government forget about communist regimes or something or did they just realize war with socialist states weren't bringing in enough profits so they went after Arab nations where feudalism still exists, and massive oil reserves are to be tapped into?

Oh wait...

a reply to: strongfp

Iran used to be like that. So they did develop it. I agree though, you can't bring people Democracy.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

You're right. But something changed, and it's a rather deep subject, but oil, and far more sinister agenda, was the deep down secret.

What happened with Saddam and Iraq should not be forgotten, the US went in not for WMDs, but to prove a point and to gain a quick buck in the terms of oil. It was an intimidation tactic to prove to the Arab and middle eastern world the US were here stay. And it's been quite clear that exactly has happened.

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: Lumenari

This is the biggest far cry us 'western folk' have against other nations around the world; "just let the people decide and break free from oppression".

Yea it doesn't really work like that. The mindset you are bringing forth is the classic neo liberal agenda, bring 'liberal democracy' to nations that have not developed it.

OK, why not go bring a big dose of democracy to places like Vietnam? Did your government forget about communist regimes or something or did they just realize war with socialist states weren't bringing in enough profits so they went after Arab nations where feudalism still exists, and massive oil reserves are to be tapped into?

Oh wait...

You seem to use that a lot.
Got anything else in your repertoire ?

I Would guess in the spotlight they might practice civil rules of war. but behind the scenes are as obscene as every other country.




a reply to: Bloodworth

It seems just now that President Trump has opened the possibility of peace and diminishing threat. It depends if Iran rids itself of the Mullah's ..... a possibility.. Up until 1979 we were at peace with them

a reply to: Bloodworth

Does Iran follow the Geneva convention rules of war?

I don't think any of them really follow those rules.

Iran can play the long game (maybe) and hit back a year from now using proxies.

a reply to: Bloodworth

And countries with the possibility to do this should be dealt with accordingly?

Soo take over the world?

originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Bloodworth

And countries with the possibility to do this should be dealt with accordingly?

Soo take over the world?

Sounds like an excellent plan.
I have NO idea why we ever gave up on the idea of making an Empire. Id very much like to take up that hobby in the near future.

The Romans made use of such an Empire, it nearly became complete........ and now you know the rest of the story