Who Are The Globalists And What Do They Want?

Article Source.

Snippet:

I get the question often, though one would think it's obvious - Who are these “globalists” we refer to so much in the liberty movement? Sometimes the request comes from honest people who only want to learn more. Sometimes it comes from disinformation agents attempting to mire discussion on the issue with assertions that the globalists "don't exist". The answer to the question can be simple and complex at the same time. In order to understand who the globalists are, we first have to understand what they want.

You will have likely read much of this content. My takeaway is that it is a briefing on this subject that is well referenced. It also is very detailed and inclusive of the subject matter. It is a good piece to send to your skeptic friends if they will take the time to closely examine the evidence and evaluate the article's conclusions.

a reply to: machineintelligence
They want the creation of an Israeli state, it's pretty clear.

originally posted by: TheMasterOne
a reply to: machineintelligence
They want the creation of an Israeli state, it's pretty clear.

Care to elaborate please?

Thank you.

Lags

Who are they - simple answer, nameless and faceless

What do they want - simple answer, untold wealth and power

Sounds about right and a good start for anyone getting started into this mess.

The Cult of B a a l


Q Web Link

The Deep State Mapping project has done a great job with the Q Web linking up many of the important organizations of the globalist agenda and how they relate. A great way to get ones head around many of the important pieces of the chess board. The video goes through a few other diagrams put together that explains some of the history that lead us here.

It does not include everything and for a deeper dive: The global elite

Agenda 21 has been a big rally call for the globalist, now they are working on Agenda 2030. It is not all bad from what I have seen, but there are many practical problems, concerns and disagreement remaining. The idea of a carbon tax stinks bad for a global government slush fund. Capitalism will sort out pollution if the technology is allowed out. The way the vaccination issues are being handled also concern me deeply with conflict of interest in pushing them, lack of standards in drug development and silence of any descent, despite how well educated in this complex technology.

On the money side we have people like Bill Gates and George Soros getting their way. There is also other dark money made through the black market that has a strong hidden influence in globalism.

Given the fact that the parts in that computer that accesses this forum involves multiple countries and extensive supply chains, then almost everyone is a globalist.

Also, globalization isn't about centralization but concentration of wealth among a few. That's because that's the result of capitalism.

A one-world currency has been in place for decades. It's called the "petrodollar."

A cashless society has also been in place for decades because most of money doesn't consist of bills and coins.

Globalists don't want or need a one-world government because most governments rely on them for funds.

The goal of sustainability is not to present human beings as dangerous but to sustain economic growth, and one of the ways is to create the illusion that there is such a thing.

Population control isn't about eugenics but about stabilizing population growth. That's because growth that's too high or too low is detrimental to economic growth.

Narcissistic sociopathy is the only thing that the article got right, but it applies to most people.

The reference to Lucifer is nonsense, not to mention sustainability. The religion followed by globalists is capitalism.

a reply to: monkeyluv

100-percent this.

The "liberty movement" is comprised of dyed-in-the-wool fourth and fifth placers who want to rebalance the table mid-game. Bless their hearts.

I'm a universalist; I'm for Dyson swarms and the creative utilization of our star. I'm for colonization of the inner and outer solar system and beyond.

We literally can't get there from here because we spend 99-percent of our energy playing monkey politics with economic fundamentalists. The question is: can we evolve our civilization fast enough to survive our history.

a reply to: monkeyluv

The reference to Lucifer is nonsense

I do disagree with this. Luciferian philosophy is common amongst the global elite. The Lucis trust (previously the Lucifer Publishing Company) does a lot of publishing for the UN. Lots of strange symbolism when looking into it.

Psychopathic tendencies to have a tendency to rise to the top. Ponerology is the study of evil. How organizations like UNICEF and the Red Cross have been influenced by the human trafficking trade has been a real problem, not nonsense.

I am not saying everyone in this game is evil. Not all involved with Lucifer ideas are satanic pedophiles. But to pretend it does not exist is naive.

originally posted by: Lagomorphe

originally posted by: TheMasterOne
a reply to: machineintelligence
They want the creation of an Israeli state, it's pretty clear.

Care to elaborate please?

It's been established masons of high degree are jews only (some books talk about this); globalists (=people of high power: politics, judges, wealthy entrepreneurs, police/militaries etc.. ) are masons, i can't prove this though.
Ask yourself why the italian government has banned masons from bein able to be in the executive branch. Answer, masons have allegiance only to themselves, hence it's a preemptive and very sane act imo coming from a state.
Jews of high caliber are sionists, they support the creation of an israeli state.
Why is Trump in such trouble right now ? He's dismantling the deep state in the U.S (= globalists)
Why the Epstein story is surfacing now (the guy had been arrested in 2002 or something), couldn't this happen in the Obama/Bush era? Nope. It's all connected

Globalist has always been a dog whistle for Jew. It’s been used for a long time by groups like the KKK and Neo-Nazis.

Today there may be people who think it’s something else, but they’re just being used by the people who use that phrase as a code word for “Jewish”.

Whether they know it or not.

a reply to: underwerks

I think like many political ideas, it's often more complex and misunderstood than that.

Are there cases you speak of? Look no further than parts of this thread to support that case.

Are there some people who just feel bad policies have been put into place that negatively impact their nation? Sure. Does that mean they're racist? No.

I think someone correctly pointed out its just capitalism, and to elaborate, people exploiting it by getting their grubby hands in the pockets of politicians on both sides of the aisle. It's also the result of the hunger for cheap goods.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Are there some people who just feel bad policies have been put into place that negatively impact their nation? Sure. Does that mean they're racist? No.

It behooves anyone who discusses politics to understand the origins of the words they use. It’s been used as a dog whistle for a long, long time.

Whether they want to believe it or not, the people who use that word to mean something else are furthering the cause of the people who have traditionally used that word.

It’d be better if everyone came up with a different word if they mean something else.

a reply to: underwerks

It behooves anyone who discusses politics to understand the origins of the words they use. It’s been used as a dog whistle for a long, long time.

Whether they want to believe it or not, the people who use that word to mean something else are furthering the cause of the people who have traditionally used that word.

Then "they" win.

It's a word, people don't just get to claim a word... We all decide what value a word holds, and we can take that power away from them.

Globalization is the inverse of isolationism. Both can be bad, both can be good. No side holds exclusivity to either anyways, both sides have gripes with either school of thought.

For instance, much of the left takes jabs at globalism when it comes to transnational corporations dodging taxes in their home countries. That is a result of opening up regulations allowing companies to keep large amounts of capital in offshore tax havens. This effects many, many countries.

In my opinion, discounting an idea by defaulting it to racism is just as intellectually lazy as the actual racists who use it to further their agenda. So for some who are all "JoOz ArE baD, tHey'Re tAkinG oVeR", to me is the same as those who say an effort to create a strong domestic economy is racist.

a reply to: machineintelligence

Who are the globalists? The people that control everything.

What do they want? Control.

originally posted by: underwerks
Globalist has always been a dog whistle for Jew. It’s been used for a long time by groups like the KKK and Neo-Nazis.

Great that's a first for me now i'm branded a "neo-nazi" or "kkk"; in fact if you'd know history, you'd know masonry and KKK are intertwined at some point (not the beginning).
The code words you must give when you're an apprentice, companion, master, many (if not all) come from the Hebrew ; Albert Pike (supreme master of masons, a.k.a The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite masons) was also a member of the KKK ("Grand Wizard") , he signed a chart of reciprocity (1874) with the B'NAI B'RITH (masons group forbidden to non jews which is higher than the 33rd degree (dang there is a group higher than 33rd !? Surprise).
Later the B'NAI B'RITH group (now officially masons) aknowledged the merits of the KKK in its own review (1924).
source (not in english): youtu.be...
book: (link tracking not allowed)/35g9my8

This is a question I've often asked and pondered with no real straight answer. I think most people want there to be some secret, hidden SPECTRE or HYDRA like organization behind the scenes. The reality I think is that for the most part, it isn't organized in that manner.

You just have some people who think GLOBALLY and other people who are more nationalistic just as some people naturally think conservative and others think liberally.

I think people just naturally gravitate and want to socialize with others like them. As you move up in business, the academic world, politics, etc... a big part of that is socializing and it often leads to membership in many of these organizations. This is why you see so many of the "elites" involved in the same groups even if they may have differing views.

The one thing I've learned over the years, the circle is pretty small as you start moving up the ladder of success. You are often never one or two people removed from someone else prominent.

With that said, yes you have powerful and rich people who may have their own views as to how the world should be run. Soros, Gates, and others. They contribute money to causes they think are important, but none of it is coordinated in the way I think most of us conspiracy buffs like to think.

a reply to: machineintelligence

Thanks for the read. I am still reading the paper, but as I reached the paragraph broaching eugenics, my mind started blowing over all of these DNA services and the horror movie it makes when the entirety of the populations DNA is in the hands of a Eugenically motivated control.

Great thread potential here Machineintel...

Pike had many connections to Italian freemasons....one being Giuseppe Mazzini a powerful mason in Italy credited with creating the MAFIA an acronym of five words representing criminal actions. Black European nobility are big players in world dominance at the core. I E Vatican..then followed by secondary players.. Rothchilds , Rockefellers... Bill gates and Soros fall in line behing those mentioned... Lucerferians are no doubt involved as Christianity and Judaism are front religions...a reply to: TheMasterOne

a reply to: CriticalStinker

Why?

Why use it when it’s so easy not to? Why empower these alt-right dirtbags who get a kick out of seeing people unknowingly further their cause? To me, when you don’t care about it and help them further their cause that’s when they win.

It’s so easy not to feed into what they want. So easy that in fact, it really makes me question anyone who chooses to use that term knowing it’s connotations.

It's actually very simple. Follow the history of usury from the time of Christ.