OIG Report on FISA Abuse Released

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: tanstaafl
"It ain't over yet."

Yeah, it is, Trump is out and Biden is in, it's as over as it can possibly be.

You're confused. The bet had nothing to do with who won the Presidential election.

"Too bad you failed to establish a time limit. Not that I would have agreed to it. But reality is, there is still plenty of time..."

Look at you, welching, exactly what everyone thought would happen.

Can't welch on a bet the terms & conditions of which haven't been fully realized. I thought you were smarter than that.

Pay up, you lost.

Patience, little one.

originally posted by: tanstaafl
You're confused. The bet had nothing to do with who won the Presidential election.

The only person who is confused is the one still thinking that Durham is going to prosecute anyone under Biden's administration.

Can't welch on a bet the terms & conditions of which haven't been fully realized.

Like I said, are you confused about Durham?

a reply to: tanstaafl

Not only will no one of consequence go to jail but neither will the people of NO consequence.

Pay me my money.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

Not only will no one of consequence go to jail but neither will the people of NO consequence.

Pay me my money.

You are still confused.

The bet wasn't about anyone going to jail, it was about indictments.

Also - Durham is still going, and is now Special Counsel.

Tick-tock

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Also - Durham is still going, and is now Special Counsel.

Sure he's still going. Any day now. Any day.

Tick-tock

So far you've been correct on exactly ZERO, which is even more impressive than someone being 100% right. I mean you really have to live in an altered reality to get nothing correct.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: tanstaafl
"Also - Durham is still going, and is now Special Counsel."

Sure he's still going. Any day now. Any day.

Was he or was he not appointed as SC?

Is he legitimately looking for crimes? We won't know unless/until he either indicts others, or announces the conclusion of his investigation without any indictments. If he is legit, there will be indictments.

So far you've been correct on exactly ZERO, which is even more impressive than someone being 100% right. I mean you really have to live in an altered reality to get nothing correct.

Actually, I have been 100% correct about the nature of the massive crimes that have sop far gone unprosecuted.

Are you so clueless as to believe that there have been no crimes?

originally posted by: tanstaafl
Is he legitimately looking for crimes?

Oh, I'm totally sure he is, maybe someone will get indicted in 2000 and never.

Actually, I have been 100% correct about the nature of the massive crimes that have sop far gone unprosecuted.

Sure you have. Maybe they'll round everyone up like you thought they would, it's not to late.

a reply to: tanstaafl

You can pay up now.

U.S. Attorney Durham Announces Departure from Office

After serving as the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut for more than three years, and as a federal prosecutor in Connecticut for more than 38 years, John H. Durham today announced his resignation from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, effective at midnight on February 28.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Is he staying on as special council?

Was his resignation from the U.S. A.O requested by Biden's administration?

Can the administration fire him as special council if in fact he still is special council?

As special council no longer with the us attorney generals office would he be under more or less oversite from the current administration?

Just a few questions that come to mind imediatly after reading your comment.

a reply to: Stevenmonet
It was in a story last week this was happening so it isn’t really new news. The story stated he was staying on as special council for the Russian investigation. I saw a teeet or something that said he agreed to resign so Biden didn’t have to fire him. Don’t know if true.

I am not sure how this affects anything else if he is even still working on the report. For all we know it could be done and they are waiting for the right time to release it or he could have been a lazy dude all along and done nothing who knows.

a reply to: Stevenmonet

He is but only someone ignoring reality thinks anything will come of it...

It is becoming apparent that the prosecution of former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith may be the zenith of special counsel John Durham's investigation into the roots of the FBI's "Crossfire Hurricane" investigation involving Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 campaign. Recent reporting suggests no other senior FBI or Department of Justice (DOJ) officials will face criminal charges.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

You can pay up now.

Hardy har har.

He resigned his position as US Attorney.

He is still acting as Special Counsel.

With Biden as President, of course, this isn't going anywhere.
Stick a fork in it.
The biggest scandal in US political history successfully brushed under the carpet and the sad thing is that around 50% of the country are happy about that.

originally posted by: UKTruth
The biggest scandal in US political history successfully brushed under the carpet and the sad thing is that around 50% of the country are happy about that.

I wonder if they're going to win money on a bet as well.

a reply to: tanstaafl

You can pay up now, Durham is done and looks like no one of any consequence got indicted.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Fair
Congratulations

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: tanstaafl

Not only will no one of consequence go to jail but neither will the people of NO consequence.

Pay me my money.

Learn and understand “parallel construction via incidental collection”

Absent understanding that, no one can understand why the USG may advance any conclusion.

a reply to: JohnTitorSociety

Yeah, that's nice. Three people charged, one low level, no name nudnik convicted. He was wrong, I was correct. The end.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
You cheering on this farce, is delish.
The fbi is corrupt, yay for you.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Oh, well, not my problem. I made it clear four years ago what was going to happen.