It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing

page: 13
25
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 18 2019 @ 02:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Nothin

I have my way of understanding this, you have Yours...



posted on Dec, 18 2019 @ 03:34 PM
link   
For Our universe to be a compressed matter that can expand in another void of Space... Our universe can only have been formed by a compression within a different void.


If absolute nothing existed before Our universe, only a absolute empty void of sapce could have created Our universe. And it did so by compression...

When it comes to Our understanding a void of Space that is absolute infinite and empty can not create because it is a absolute constant. A absolute constant can never change. These are the laws of Our physical universe… But since Our universe was created it means that the absolute is guided by other laws then the laws that are guided by Our universe….?

And God said….. : Let there be light..?


Lets go a bit further….


If a Space that is absolute empty and take up all Space there is. Would it lose volume if it created finite by a compression…...?

The answer is no....


The singularity was formed With all the Properties that have shaped Our history through time. For the once who dont know… Our future is also already determined because of this…..

The expansion/evolution of Our univers fallows a strict timeline…..We know what existed before in history….but we dont know what the future will bring.... And we wont know it by studing time..... You wont be judged by the truth, but what the law state,.....
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2019 @ 02:06 AM
link   

originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: Nothin

I have my way of understanding this, you have Yours...


Well: we have your way anyways, which hasn't changed in 10 years, despite multiple unanswered challenges.

Was worth a challenge, when you earlier called your opinion: "absolute Truth" and "basic common sense", despite virtually no-one agreeing with you for a at least a decade here on ATS.

But alas: rare are those that are open to examining their own beliefs, especially entrenched ones.
You are welcome to believe whatever you want, but nobody else has to accept you selling them as "absolute Truth" and "basic common sense".



posted on Dec, 19 2019 @ 11:57 AM
link   
a reply to: Nothin

The truth have nothing to do With demokracy, It is not the majority that have the right to the truth. The odds of People understanding my explanations are very limiteted. And i know it... You don't even get it... But you are not interested in understanding. You are just interested in pushing Your own view. But so am i....

And People will never understand what i have to say. That is the reality of Things... And i am fine With that.

What ever People agree on, this site will have no impact on reality or science anyways. This is just a site for arguing ones point of view. We are not going to resolve this topic here on ATS ever. And very few will agree With other members point of view.. Because everyone have their own view and are loyal to it...….. I am and so are you… I am fine With that… I have no expectation from any of you. If any hope maybe some People will be able to argue against my explanations in a proper way. I have had the same argument for more then ten years…. That is because it still stands. No member is able to change mye view of this topic…. Unless they can Counter my arguments..... People seam to lack the abilty to argue my view With any sound reasoning… Maybe People just dont know how to argue their point properly….? If you have a proper argument i will always Challenge it if it does not fit into my view of Things.... Like i have done With you….

I have been on ATS for more then ten years. More Close to 20...…


I will fight you if you are wrong according to my views. And i will argue it in detail. That is how sure i am about my stand. After more then ten years With the same argument.... you sort of get the hint when peopel cant argue…. Peopel will start to attack my person and not my reasoning… You have been looking me up why is that…. Is that so you can change Your tacktics and attack my person...? Is this how smart you are… ?


edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 19 2019 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Nothin

Nothin Your a damn fool…. If you think you can figure out who i am.... So that you can discredit my arguments...

But keep in mind if you do i will have you charged…. For being able to Reach information not suposed to be know to the Public.


So you better be #ing sure about what Your doing…

If you have the ability to know about me i will know that you are from the same country as i am and that you have acces to government infomration.
You would be a state employee or have friends with this acces to be able to get this information.

Be a #ing herro i dare you….
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 20 2019 @ 12:49 AM
link   
a reply to: spy66

Oh my !
What an unfortunate post.
Am sorry that you are in distress, but don't have a clue what you are going-on about ?

Apologies about any perceived words, or whatever, that may have set you off.
Do you need help ?



posted on Dec, 31 2019 @ 01:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: rom12345
being able to imagine nothing
would be like not being able to do so.


Perhaps 'it': is not of imagination ?



posted on Jan, 3 2020 @ 11:46 PM
link   
Rule #1 of Illuminati summer camp:

Don't talk about Illuminati summer camp

Rule #2 of Illuminati summer camp:
Light is a speed limit, not a tangible.


I've never been a fan of rules, and contrary to popular belief neither has God.

You can't have output without input. And you can only convince morons that every light color travels the same speed.

The Satanists, all branches sects and societies worship the output and hide
, neglect deny and demonify the input. Franklin demonstrates it best denoting the vitreous as positive and the resinous as negative.

The big bang was a reflection, and the science of reflection is mistaught and oversimplified, as is the nature of light. Everything in existence was and could scientifically speaking only be created by the lowest waveform in existence, yet what do the ministers preach? High frequency. Powerless pulse code modulations. Planets as gods, orbits as byproducts of the unholy spirit. Digital particles as a valid future, analogue waveforms as a relic of our past.



posted on Feb, 10 2020 @ 04:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Nothin


Ah: you are asking questions now ! Good !

If you dream that you are riding a motorcycle: how did you create that motorcycle ?
Did you assemble it bolt by bolt, paint it, inflate the tires, put gas in the tank ?
Or does it just appear, out of nowhere ?

Are you open to to questioning consensual-reality ?

From the realm of science: we have PHD Theoretical Physicists, and Nobel laureates: Niels Bohr, and Werner Heisenberg, whom heartily questioned consensual-reality;




Now listen to Niels Bohr, the pioneer of 20th century physics:
"An independent reality, in the ordinary physical sense, can neither be ascribed to the phenomena nor to the agencies of observation. "

Consider the words of Shankara, the famous Hindu philosopher: "All things -- from Brahma the creator down to a single blade of grass -- are. . .simply appearances and not real."

Compare with Werner Heisenberg, the inventor of quantum mechanics: "If one wants to give an accurate description of the elementary particle. . .the only thing which can be written down as description is a probability function. But then one sees that not even the quality of being. . .belongs to what is described".



Now listen to Niels Bohr, the pioneer of 20th century physics:
"An independent reality, in the ordinary physical sense, can neither be ascribed to the phenomena nor to the agencies of observation. "

Consider the words of Shankara, the famous Hindu philosopher: "All things -- from Brahma the creator down to a single blade of grass -- are. . .simply appearances and not real."

Compare with Werner Heisenberg, the inventor of quantum mechanics: "If one wants to give an accurate description of the elementary particle. . .the only thing which can be written down as description is a probability function. But then one sees that not even the quality of being. . .belongs to what is described".

Source: Quantum Mechanics, and reality.

( But remember: those are opinions, interpretations, etc... Not absolute truths. )





Now listen to Niels Bohr, the pioneer of 20th century physics:
"An independent reality, in the ordinary physical sense, can neither be ascribed to the phenomena nor to the agencies of observation. "

Consider the words of Shankara, the famous Hindu philosopher: "All things -- from Brahma the creator down to a single blade of grass -- are. . .simply appearances and not real."

Compare with Werner Heisenberg, the inventor of quantum mechanics: "If one wants to give an accurate description of the elementary particle. . .the only thing which can be written down as description is a probability function. But then one sees that not even the quality of being. . .belongs to what is described".


Hey Nothin !
Vat ?
You don't know nothin !
Ok.


edit on 10-2-2020 by Nothin because: sp



posted on Jul, 14 2020 @ 07:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Hammaraxx

Have you ever looked at the simulation hypothesis? From the perspective of a computer simulation nothing exists until the computer is turned on. It might look like a big bang.



posted on Jul, 15 2020 @ 02:39 PM
link   
a reply to: centrifugal

That was a part of the idea at the beginning of one of my short-stories: I AM: your creator. [AI2019]



To begin simulation: press enter...


LoL ! It was fun writing that !



posted on Apr, 19 2021 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Talking about "nothing" is problematic because it is impossible to define and impossible to know if such a concept ever existed or can exist.

I think most people do not believe something comes from nothing. Even atheists think the universe most likely came from something, but see no reason to assume that hypothetical something is an omnipotent being with no source. It's just as crazy as coming from nothing.



posted on Apr, 19 2021 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Toothache
Nothing does not exist....
Nothing means absence of anything.



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 10  11  12   >>

log in

join