-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- Questions. White House Insider's postings -PART- -22-

a reply to: onehuman

Excellent find! From your research, it looks like Hillary has registered at the Federal level, but it's the state-by-state registration that late-entry Democrats are scrambling to meet.

a reply to: dashen

Thanks much, Dashen!

Cheers

Info today from the acting AG who preceded William Barr.

Something's about to POP: www.foxnews.com...

originally posted by: carewemust
Info today from the acting AG who preceded William Barr.

Something's about to POP: www.foxnews.com...

Obviously, I agree. Something big is about to POP. His speech alone tells me he is fired up and ready to pull the trigger.....pun intended.

And Whitaker is the HAMMER!

a reply to: Vasa Croe

This is a big reason why Liberals on ATS give so much push-back, and accuse Conservatives of pipe-dreaming.

Here is a Liberal Media update regarding the soon to be released FISA Abuse report.

What the report says is still unknown. But some witnesses who have been interviewed by the inspector general say that they expect that the report will likely reveal some missteps, though none that should be interpreted as undermining the legitimate Bob Mueller investigation.

www.cnn.com...

That type of wording is why most Democrats think Republicans are blowing these investigations into Obama Administration actions, way out of proportion. All the liberal media networks and publications say the same thing.

a reply to: onehuman

Interesting dig but No, I don't think so.
Since anyone can use pseudonyms it could be anyone.
Secondly, Socialist party... No way.
Third, that person is registered from Michigan, address is a lower middle-class residential neighborhood.
No campaign finance data.
docquery.fec.gov...

You can lookup other names here: www.fec.gov...

a reply to: carewemust

I will tell you one thing.

I am sick and tired of the sheer number of stacked cookies they want to send. Disgusting!

Fox should assess why they want that information.

P

a reply to: carewemust

though none that should be interpreted as undermining the legitimate Bob Mueller investigation.

I love it when the MSM propaganda tells us how to interpret events. "Legitimate" ... my foot.

Cheers

If you just want to lurk and don't want to bother with hosts files but still want to get on 8kun?

You can use the clearnet>TOR gateway at onion.ws

Put .ws after onion in any onion link to access the tor website via clearnet

jthnx5wyvjvzsxtu.onion.ws...
jthnx5wyvjvzsxtu.onion.ws...

originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: carewemust

though none that should be interpreted as undermining the legitimate Bob Mueller investigation.

I love it when the MSM propaganda tells us how to interpret events. "Legitimate" ... my foot.

Cheers

Barr gives a summary of the Mueller Report which he has read, all heck breaks loose.

MSM Fake News peeps give a summary of the IG Report which they haven’t read, it’s to be accepted as “news”.

They are worried.

originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: 0dark4Ever

That would be under the mindset that our "Votes" matter. I believe it's all predetermined.

IMO, it would be irresponsible to allow the populace to actually choose who becomes POTUS.

This Country is unfortunately full of people that are Stoned, Uninformed and Gullible.

I wish it was up to us..what a Utopia that would be but, It's not.

The people *don't* choose the President. Electors do.

Twelfth Amendment:

www.usconstitution.net...

originally posted by: Sabrechucker
a reply to: 0dark4Ever

That would be under the mindset that our "Votes" matter. I believe it's all predetermined.

IMO, it would be irresponsible to allow the populace to actually choose who becomes POTUS.

This Country is unfortunately full of people that are Stoned, Uninformed and Gullible.

I wish it was up to us..what a Utopia that would be but, It's not.

Last election was a very big deal. People came out in unprecedented numbers not because they were galvanized behind Trump but rather energized by the fact that a Hilary presidency would be catastrophic.

After having experienced an economic boom here in America under Trump and a complete about face on the world stage, people will again turn out in droves this time galvanized behind President Trump.

This would mean the complete annihilation of the Old Guard. All that being said, there will still always be a "Guard"

Well since the debate has been opened I'll leave this here:

en.wikipedia.org...

To me it represents the biggest voter fraud since dead people voting. It's real and could come into play this election. Tying the electoral vote to the national popular vote effectively nullifies the will of the people in that state. When this was introduced in my state it was done quietly. The bill was pushed through the state house and signed into law by the governor literally in the middle of the night. It was done in under 20 days with no media coverage or debate. That makes it imperative that everyone get out and vote this year. Not only that pay attention to what your respective state governments are up to, it does count.

Wake up

PAUL SPERRY:
Republicans are so clueless. Their list of requested witnesses omits the one person who knows where all the Burisma bodies are buried: AMOS HOCHSTEIN. He was Biden's energy adviser in Ukraine. He also dealt with the whistleblower. (Of course, Schiff wouldn't OK a subpoena anyway)

twitter.com...

LOL...Pelosi and Schitt

originally posted by: queenofswords
22...a Master number.

I have a feeling much more will be revealed this go-'round. And then? And then? #23. And we all know what THAT means, don't we!

To Dashen and all that continue this Quest:

"The highest reward for a person's toil is not what they get for it,
but what they become by it"....John Ruskin quote

And if it is only for us all to be Wiser, I can handle that outcome.

Pinned on POTUS Twitter😂

originally posted by: EndtheMadnessNow
a reply to: cherokeetroy

WTH crazy insanity are they up to now?! This is interesting because the Army Is Spending Half a Billion to Train Soldiers to Fight Underground.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

1) One of the two possibilities in the convergent timeline [nothing can stop what's coming, nothing] is people living underground. While it is unlikely, it is possible and the armed forces are preparing.
2) The underground bases held by non-humans will be cleansed as part of the awakening.

originally posted by: Bill1960
Well since the debate has been opened I'll leave this here:

en.wikipedia.org...

To me it represents the biggest voter fraud since dead people voting. It's real and could come into play this election. Tying the electoral vote to the national popular vote effectively nullifies the will of the people in that state. When this was introduced in my state it was done quietly. The bill was pushed through the state house and signed into law by the governor literally in the middle of the night. It was done in under 20 days with no media coverage or debate. That makes it imperative that everyone get out and vote this year. Not only that pay attention to what your respective state governments are up to, it does count.

Here's the problem, and yes, I'm going off topic probably:

There is not and never has been a "popular vote" for the American President.

When anyone tells you "Hillary won the popular vote" - including Hilary herself, they're either lying or ignorant of the process.

The U.S. vote has *always* been for "electors" who then represent their district/state. It's the electors who choose the President, not the people (everything in our Constitution is representative, not direct). That's the Red/Blue map they always show of how many "electors" a candidate needs to win. It's in the Constitution, and always has been.

Why is this important?

Because human nature, and the reasons people either vote or don't vote, means that people behave differently in an "elector" vote than they would in a "popular" vote.

Example: If I lived in California I might not even bother voting because CA is no matter what going for a (D) candidate for Pres. No point in me going to the polls because I know that, in CA, I'm vastly outnumbered.

Similarly, if I live in WY, it's going Red no matter what. If I live 50 miles from the poll, I might not want to drive that in a rain or snow storm, just to vote "Red" when I know my state is going "red" no matter what. No point in it, my guy wins my state whether I vote or not.

So you can see that the electoral college in many instances can suppress people's desire to get to the poll and vote, and thus turnout is low. But the reason they vote or don't vote is because of the nature of the process - the electoral college vote is what suppresses turnout.

On the other hand, in a pure "popular vote" election, every vote literally counts. My vote in WY may be offset by a vote in CA, but I have to cast my vote in WY in order to even it out. If I don't cast my vote in WY, I lose because one in CA gives the other guy an extra vote.

So in a popular vote situation, voter turnout will be naturally much greater than in a "electoral college" situation. Counting votes in an "electoral college" vote and equating them to "popular vote" is just wrong, the votes, the turnout, the results are not equivalent.

So can we please stop this "She won the popular vote" lie?