Impeachment witness Kent helped bury investigation into Ukrainian election interference

a reply to: Sillyolme
Thank you for a rational post. A lot gets lost on these discussions.

So we have one side claiming Ukraine interfered with the 2016 election to hurt Trump with little in the way of actual evidence, yet that side dismisses that Trump abused his power to pressure Ukraine for dirt on a political rival, despite strong evidence saying this.

If one thinks there is no evidence against Trump, then it is insane to claim there is evidence that Ukraine helped Hillary in 2016.

One can't have it both ways, no matter how loud the echo chamber is.

a reply to: jrod

All we need to know is that many people find an admission by a unofficial to interfering in the election as being “little evidence”

Unbelievable

a reply to: Grambler

You are twisting the narrative, unless you consider exposing Manafort interfering in the US election.

But as Trump said, he can shoot someone and his supporters will still love him. Exposing his corrupt henchmen clearly does not bother his faithful.

a reply to: jrod

Can you show me one media member, democrat, or k tel official that said Russian interference that was truthful was perfectly fine?

Funny how excuse after excuse us given to excuse interference that helped hillary

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: xuenchen
Those 2 clowns that "testified" today are expert Deep State operatives and they are experts in covering up corruption.
😎 Notice how all the "answers" and "statements" were cleverly crafted by deep state lawyers 😎

How dare you say that about these patriotic, life-long public servants who love America more than their own children!

On second thought, I think all these diplomats, bureaucrats, most House members and MainStreamMedia, spend most of their days watching television, wining-dining, and in meetings.

Though they should be, none of them are aware that Senate Judiciary chairman Chuck Grassley, asked our Department of Justice to investigate Ukraine corruption, and Ukraine-DNC colluding to help Hillary/hurt Trump, back in July 2017.

Grassley's 2017 Request: theconservativetreehouse.com...-17 6070

Just an observation - "the Conservative Tree House" - doesn't that sound a bit like a site targeting youth?

HuffPO? That site is not like HuffPO, so nope.

There are many newspapers that call themselves the 'Post' or something similar. So I don't see the Huffington Post as particularly unusual and HuffPO is merely an abbreviation of the name. even so, I still don't see it as being as childish as a treehouse.

Please examine the graphics and style of The Conservative Treehouse. It clearly has a 'youthful' slant especially when compared to other MSM sites (like for instance, Fox News).

a reply to: Grambler

Excuses. That is what you are here doing for Trump and company. It's like you guys have an endless list of excuses for Trump and his associates(many of whom have been prosecuted).

How can a reasonable person still believe Trump is innocent when so many of his inner circle have been found guilty for a plethora of crimes.

The house of cards is falling.

a reply to: jrod

I get it

The need to finally default to “trump must be guilty cause people around him have been charged” in an attempt to g it’s hypocrisy and allowed election interference that helped the Dems

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: Grambler

Excuses. That is what you are here doing for Trump and company. It's like you guys have an endless list of excuses for Trump and his associates(many of whom have been prosecuted).

How can a reasonable person still believe Trump is innocent when so many of his inner circle have been found guilty for a plethora of crimes.

The house of cards is falling.

So trump is somehow guilty because "so many of his innear circle have been found guilty for a plethra of crimes"

but obama who has KNOWN convicted weather underground domestic terrorist, a openly racist and anti Semite, along with several cabinet post holders who are PROVEN tax cheats/evaders (with one being made head of the IRS of all irony) along with other "innear circle found guilty " is not responsible/innocent.

man when you go for mental justification gymnastics and hypocrisy you go for the gold.

yet you expect to be taken seriously.

smh just doesnt cover it.

scrounger