It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Should a business owner, open to the public, be able to refuse service to anyone, at any time, for any reason or no reason whatsoever?
Should a business owner be able to hire, refuse to hire and/or fire whoever they like, whenever they like, for any reason or no reason whatsoever?
Should a business owner be able to determine what behavior is allowed or not allowed (e.g., smoking, carrying of firearms, etc) inside their place of business, based solely on their personal likes/dislikes/beliefs?
originally posted by: tanstaafl
...
I may hate what a natzi/racist/scumbag is saying, but I'll fight to the death for their right to say it. ...
originally posted by: chiefsmom
I had a problem with the second question.
Having been sexually harassed at work, I don't think someone should be able to fire me, because I wouldn't let them grab my: (insert body part here), or wouldn't have sex with them.
originally posted by: loam
Your questions are rather flawed.
Some businesses operate like a public utility or monopoly, or receive public funding, and in those cases I think my answers change somewhat.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
"Should a business owner, open to the public, be able to refuse service to anyone, at any time, for any reason or no reason whatsoever?"
No. The reason has fall into legal reasoning. For example, you shouldn't be able to refuse service because of someone's race/ethnicity, religion or gender. If they haven't bathed and are stinking up your shop, then sure.
"Should a business owner be able to hire, refuse to hire and/or fire whoever they like, whenever they like, for any reason or no reason whatsoever?"
No. Sexual harassment, like Chiefsmom says isn't a valid reason. Neither is race/ethnicity, religion or gender, as long as the person is doing their job.
I once got fired, as a waitress, for my hair. I put it up in a nice bun, got it cut and even wore a wig for a awhile. They still hated my hair, no matter what, and fired me.
"Should a business owner be able to determine what behavior is allowed or not allowed (e.g., smoking, carrying of firearms, etc) inside their place of business, based solely on their personal likes/dislikes/beliefs?"
Sure. Within reason. I don't think employers should force religious observations on employees, for example.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: chiefsmom
I had a problem with the second question.
Having been sexually harassed at work, I don't think someone should be able to fire me, because I wouldn't let them grab my: (insert body part here), or wouldn't have sex with them.
So... you would prefer to continue working for someone who did that to you?
originally posted by: Nothin
Would you therefore, support and encourage, any ..."...natzi/racist/scumbag..."... (sic), to set-up a soapbox on your front-lawn, and verbally spew for hours on end, every day ?
Would you therefore, support and encourage, any ..."...natzi/racist/scumbag..."... (sic), to speak at a general assembly in your children's school ?
Would you take-away their rights ?
Where do these supposed 'rights' come from anyways ?
If 'rights' are privileges: could they not be taken-away by those that have granted them ?
originally posted by: dfnj2015
Maybe if these questions are such a big deal then maybe the business owner doesn't have what it takes to be open to the public. If the business owner does not want to serve the public according to the laws and rules created by government, then the business owner always has the liberty to only do private business. Stop being a victim and a whiner. Just close your doors to the public. Someone else will gladly fill the market need according to the established public laws and rules.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
Women continue to work in environments in which they have been sexually harassed every day. They shouldn't risk their job for a sexual harassment complaint, as they often have been.
I didn't say 'based on current law'.
Ok, so, you prefer the cold comfort of chains to the animating contest of freedom.
originally posted by: BoscoMoney
Sure to all 3. But not without consequences.
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
I support the law. It works. It's not broken and doesn't need to be changed or fixed. You asked for my opinion. That's my opinion.
Did you make this thread to attack opinions that differ from your own?
I think an employer that would force me to participate in their religious observation, for example, in order to keep my job, would be the equivalent of being in "cold chains". That's not freedom.