Why cancer can be cured naturally

The link below is short article I wrote explaining what cancer is and the success rate of natural cancer treatments like the Gerson Therapy.

chipstero7.blogspot.com...

a reply to: Nathan-D

With respect I do not agree with your statement and your article. I will tell anyone that holistic medicine is great as an accompaniment to cancer treatment, it has helped many people but do not lean just to holistic medicine seek the known scientific treatment that has worked for many millions. Most people who claim to have been cured by this type of medicine have also been getting typical cancer treatment.

Please people DO NOT JUST TAKE HOLISTIC MEDICINE.

I eat quite a bit of theosulfates and I do eat cabbage regularly. I also use rutabagga in pasties, all of these are utilized by the processes in the body and have anticancer properties. The celery family members also are also anticancer. But not celarian root or celery salt, or celery seed, those parts of celery are high in Eugenol, and eugenol blocks signals in the body needed to actually plan the attack. Appigenin is up higher in the plant, that helps with autopsis of cancer cells. There are other chemicals in strawberries other than nitriloside that kill cancer too. Same with the rutabagga, that has a few anticancer chemistries. Sinnergin in cooked cabbage is more potent than regular isothiocyanates too. The guy who wrote that is only looking at a certain property and not multiple properties that can actually work symbiotically to rid our bodies of cancer.

The article is correct but is too limited in combination chemistry working together. Cyanide consumption requires intake of companion chemistry or it can make you sick. I read this article a while back and reread it again to see if I picked up anything new. It is mostly as I had evaluated it before with comparing it to things I have learned over the last ten to eleven years of researching things.

Good thread, but I am not that much of a fan of using apricot seeds as medicine, deficiencies in thiols can make the chemistry more toxic and troublesome. Many people do not like onions. Many people do not consume enough molybdenum food content and they could get negatively effected if sulfite oxidase goes to low.

Diet can be adjusted moderately to help people to fight cancer when it is small, the article addresses one method, which does work pretty well for many types of cancers.

a reply to: Dwoodward85

There have been studies that show that conventional treatment by radio therapy and chemo do NOT extend life.


www.heal-yourself.com.au...

Massaging Statistics A recent epidemiological study confirmed the questionable value of conventional therapy by concluding that 'medical interventions for cancer have had a negligible or no effect on survival' (11). Even the conservative New England Journal of Medicine had an article with the headline: Cancer Undefeated (12).


Common ways to make medical statistics look more favorable are as follows. Patients who die during prolonged treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy are not counted in the statistics, because they did not receive the full treatment. In the control group everyone who dies is counted. Further, success is judged by the percentage of temporary tumor shrinking, regardless of survival times; if survival is measured, then only in terms of dying from the treated disease. It is not normally shown how many of the patients die due to the treatment itself. The current trend is to pick up pre-cancerous conditions very early and treat them as cancer. While this statistically increases the number of people with cancer, it also artificially prolongs survival times and lowers death rates, thereby making medical treatments appear to be more successful. However, there may also be a genuine component of improved survival, as increasing numbers of cancer patients opt for additional natural therapies.


An investigation of the records of 1.2 million cancer patients revealed that the death rate attributed to non-cancer death shortly after treatment was 200 per cent higher than would normally be expected. Two years after diagnosis and treatment this excess death rate had fallen to 50%. The most common cause for the excess death was listed as heart and respiratory failure. This means instead of dying several years later of cancer, these patients died from the effects of the treatment and helped greatly improve the cancer statistics because they did not strictly die of cancer (13). This misleading reporting of cancer deaths has led to demands for more honest statistics (14).

a reply to: Dwoodward85

I only take holistic medicine and I haven’t been to a doctor, except for physicals required by my job for at least 15 years. It works fine for me. It’s all about personal preference.

There are remedies and cures for things that have been known for thousands of years. The FDA cannot regulate them, pharmaceutical companies can’t profit from them, and neither will look into them. There have been “studies” into them, but they have misused the treatments, performed extraordinarily small experiments, and openly mocked actual studies by specialists, which suggested that they are effective.

Modern science is as dogmatic as any religion and will refute any evidence that opposes their established beliefs, without any further research. Examples for this exist in every branch of science.

The evidences you use to make a comparative analysis that ends up @ undifferentiated trophoblast cells is comprised of a constellation of circumstantial observations concerning the cancers ability to project logistical abilities comparative to a placental trophoblast.

Keep most of your work and ideas...simply learn the truth....it is a Pleomorphic Bacteria that causes the impacts we incorrectly call cancer....the Pleomorphic Bacteria also mimics the placental trophoblasts logistical abilities.

You came to the right place to get the correct story.

2 critical components[ability to lay dormant--ability to jump from gut to blood to entire body in bacterial then viral then fungal form] of the reality that a Pleomorphic Bacteria is causing what we call cancer... are unsuccessfully hijacked in the linked article......the ability to change shape and mass allows a Pleomorphic Bacteria to live hidden in the gut for many years until threatened or triggered then switch to viral form and live in the blood then switch to fungal form and invade the entire body....is what the article is claiming an undifferentiated placental trophoblast cell is....

Some use iron to bait this sneaky killer.....it has abnormally high iron requirements in a specific stage.

originally posted by: one4all
The evidences you use to make a comparative analysis that ends up @ undifferentiated trophoblast cells is comprised of a constellation of circumstantial observations concerning the cancers ability to project logistical abilities comparative to a placental trophoblast.

Keep most of your work and ideas...simply learn the truth....it is a Pleomorphic Bacteria that causes the impacts we incorrectly call cancer....the Pleomorphic Bacteria also mimics the placental trophoblasts logistical abilities.

You came to the right place to get the correct story.

2 critical components[ability to lay dormant--ability to jump from gut to blood to entire body in bacterial then viral then fungal form] of the reality that a Pleomorphic Bacteria is causing what we call cancer... are unsuccessfully hijacked in the linked article......the ability to change shape and mass allows a Pleomorphic Bacteria to live hidden in the gut for many years until threatened or triggered then switch to viral form and live in the blood then switch to fungal form and invade the entire body....is what the article is claiming an undifferentiated placental trophoblast cell is....

Some use iron to bait this sneaky killer.....it has abnormally high iron requirements in a specific stage.

Those bacteria could increase our susceptability to cancer, but I would think that they would tend to be more apt at increasing autoimmune diseases, maybe diabetes, and Alzheimer disease. I won't say your aren't correct, just that I would see those problems as more related.

You could use a proteinase like bromelaine or papain to actually destroy those bacteria if taken systematically in a supplement for a while. I do not think Quercetin could disolve the slime or penetrate the bacteria as well. Now Monolaurin or lauric acid can soften and permeate their skin. so coconut oil may help.

I read about those bacteria before, but I had to do more research after reading your post and you may be correct. Bromelain also when used right takes the slime off of cancer cells that protects them. The same way it loosens up mucus in the nose and it keeps platelets from sticking together is how it accomplishes taking off the protective cancer coating which hides cancer from our immune system.

I just read three research articles on what you said, but could not find any reference to them being like viruses in nature. They are shape shifters for sure but I just saw staying in the different types of bacteria and one reference to shapes sort of like a fungus.

originally posted by: Dwoodward85
a reply to: Nathan-D

With respect I do not agree with your statement and your article. I will tell anyone that holistic medicine is great as an accompaniment to cancer treatment, it has helped many people but do not lean just to holistic medicine seek the known scientific treatment that has worked for many millions. Most people who claim to have been cured by this type of medicine have also been getting typical cancer treatment.

Please people DO NOT JUST TAKE HOLISTIC MEDICINE.

Please post for me a 10 year study in America on the long-term effectiveness of chemo and radiation therapy.

You will notice that the ACA doesn't do that.

Because the results are less then flattering.

The 5 year studies only show an overall 2.1% increase in survivability rates, after all.

Also, if the chemo kills you then cancer is blamed for it... lol.

My wife was given 6-8 months to live a little over 5 years ago.... sarcoma, stage 4, multiple tumors.

She did her own thing, a modified Gerson therapy with enzyme therapy and CBD, among other things.

Her sarcoma surgeon says that what happened isn't possible.

The tumors all died.

F### doctors, where cancer is concerned.

They are still trying to treat it like it is a disease.

It isn't.

It's a symptom.

Eight years ago, I was diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer, actually two kinds of cancer at the same time as one morphed or something. I forget the explanation. I took the route of chemo and radiation and am still here. Some have also taken the same route that I have and have been around for far longer.

I'm sure traditional treatments work for some and not others, just as natural treatments may work for some and not others.
Everyone's body is different and reacts differently to treatments. We have options. I just wouldn't want someone thinking that chemo and radiation will automatically kill you.

I had always said that if I got cancer I would not choose chemo and radiation. When I was sitting in the Doctor's office after receiving my diagnosis all of a sudden I wasn't so sure I wanted to put that much faith in non-traditional methods.

It is a very personal choice and I wish anyone faced with cancer the very best, no matter what treatment they choose.

a reply to: Night Star

I should have probably noted in my post that the doctors told us that with her particular type of sarcoma, radiation is ineffective and chemo would increase her chances of living 5 years by 13%, although it would decrease her quality of life to where it was a wash.

So we were told that the only thing they could do is to do surgery for mass removal until she couldn't have surgery anymore because she had run out of organs.

There are certain cancers (colon, breast, testicular, lung) that a chemo/radiation approach will give you a better shot then doing nothing.

However, doctors should at least be able to tell you that there alternatives out there and they do not.

Especially for the cancers that are rare enough that nobody has spent any money on research for, so they can't really do anything for you anyways.

Check out Dr Tullio Simonini... Cures cancer with baking soda and human grade peroxide... Japan opened a clinic for him after his home country of Italy rejected him.ea reply to: Nathan-D

a reply to: Lumenari

I wish Doctors would recommend alternatives too. The thing is...even Doctors, scientists etc. don't always agree on everything. So that leaves people with cancer and their families on a wild search for the best options. I hope someday there is a cure for everyone. That is my wish.

originally posted by: Night Star
a reply to: Lumenari

I wish Doctors would recommend alternatives too. The thing is...even Doctors, scientists etc. don't always agree on everything. So that leaves people with cancer and their families on a wild search for the best options. I hope someday there is a cure for everyone. That is my wish.

Stage IV cancer is no joke but it is not a death sentence (living proof). Be open to apply holistic techniques with Radio/chemical Nuclear options and experience the best result possible. NED for 1 one year battled for 3.

a reply to: vethumanbeing

What is NED?

originally posted by: Bigbrooklyn
Check out Dr Tullio Simonini... Cures cancer with baking soda and human grade peroxide... Japan opened a clinic for him after his home country of Italy rejected him.ea reply to: Nathan-D

Solid link,,,should say kills parasites with baking soda and human grade peroxide by making the entire body incompatable to parasitic life....after that treatment a shot of Auwasca to get those hard to target brain bugs and you are as good as new literally.Anyone can do it anytime.Its no coincidence so many people who get rid of the brain bugs turn their entire lives around.

originally posted by: one4all

originally posted by: Bigbrooklyn
Check out Dr Tullio Simonini... Cures cancer with baking soda and human grade peroxide... Japan opened a clinic for him after his home country of Italy rejected him.ea reply to: Nathan-D

Solid link,,,should say kills parasites with baking soda and huiman grade peroxide by making the entire body incompatable to parasitic life....after that treatment a shot of Auwasca to get those hard to target brain bugs and you are as good as new literally.Anyone can do it anytime.Its no coincidence so many people who get rid of the brain bugs turn their entire lives around.

Can you elaborate. I'd love to learn more about this treatment, just curiosity.

a reply to: Night Star

There are cures for cancer. Its just that usually to get a ticket to "practise" medicine you invest all this money, get certified by Boards of Doctors who went the same route, then set up a practise investing in equipment and workers and to get the rebates/insurance a Doctor has to play the same game. Many tests required to pay off that equipment and return a profit. Then there's liability insurance malpractise etc. Huge medical settlements if something goes wrong.

If people were given the stats on quality of life and extension of life by the administration of chemo or radiation they would think twice.

This guy here is on the right track.

Can we eat to starve cancer? | William Li

William Li presents a new way to think about cancer treatment: angiogenesis, targeting the blood vessels that feed a tumor. The crucial first (and best) step: Eating cancer-fighting foods that beat cancer at its own game.

a reply to: Nathan-D

According to what I've read here over the years you just need a combination of: hydrogen peroxide, molasses, baking soda, turmeric, CBD oil and colloidal silver. Once you figure out the correct proportions you will virtually live forever.

a reply to: TheConstruKctionofLight

With respect that is not the only case many have survived due to their cancer treatment, family members of my own included and many have lived decades. I am not saying not to do those things but to consider standard treatment. You may disagree and have a success story but that is not always the same for everyone else.