It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Massaging Statistics A recent epidemiological study confirmed the questionable value of conventional therapy by concluding that 'medical interventions for cancer have had a negligible or no effect on survival' (11). Even the conservative New England Journal of Medicine had an article with the headline: Cancer Undefeated (12).
Common ways to make medical statistics look more favorable are as follows. Patients who die during prolonged treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy are not counted in the statistics, because they did not receive the full treatment. In the control group everyone who dies is counted. Further, success is judged by the percentage of temporary tumor shrinking, regardless of survival times; if survival is measured, then only in terms of dying from the treated disease. It is not normally shown how many of the patients die due to the treatment itself. The current trend is to pick up pre-cancerous conditions very early and treat them as cancer. While this statistically increases the number of people with cancer, it also artificially prolongs survival times and lowers death rates, thereby making medical treatments appear to be more successful. However, there may also be a genuine component of improved survival, as increasing numbers of cancer patients opt for additional natural therapies.
An investigation of the records of 1.2 million cancer patients revealed that the death rate attributed to non-cancer death shortly after treatment was 200 per cent higher than would normally be expected. Two years after diagnosis and treatment this excess death rate had fallen to 50%. The most common cause for the excess death was listed as heart and respiratory failure. This means instead of dying several years later of cancer, these patients died from the effects of the treatment and helped greatly improve the cancer statistics because they did not strictly die of cancer (13). This misleading reporting of cancer deaths has led to demands for more honest statistics (14).
originally posted by: one4all
The evidences you use to make a comparative analysis that ends up @ undifferentiated trophoblast cells is comprised of a constellation of circumstantial observations concerning the cancers ability to project logistical abilities comparative to a placental trophoblast.
Keep most of your work and ideas...simply learn the truth....it is a Pleomorphic Bacteria that causes the impacts we incorrectly call cancer....the Pleomorphic Bacteria also mimics the placental trophoblasts logistical abilities.
You came to the right place to get the correct story.
2 critical components[ability to lay dormant--ability to jump from gut to blood to entire body in bacterial then viral then fungal form] of the reality that a Pleomorphic Bacteria is causing what we call cancer... are unsuccessfully hijacked in the linked article......the ability to change shape and mass allows a Pleomorphic Bacteria to live hidden in the gut for many years until threatened or triggered then switch to viral form and live in the blood then switch to fungal form and invade the entire body....is what the article is claiming an undifferentiated placental trophoblast cell is....
Some use iron to bait this sneaky killer.....it has abnormally high iron requirements in a specific stage.
originally posted by: Dwoodward85
a reply to: Nathan-D
With respect I do not agree with your statement and your article. I will tell anyone that holistic medicine is great as an accompaniment to cancer treatment, it has helped many people but do not lean just to holistic medicine seek the known scientific treatment that has worked for many millions. Most people who claim to have been cured by this type of medicine have also been getting typical cancer treatment.
Please people DO NOT JUST TAKE HOLISTIC MEDICINE.
originally posted by: Night Star
a reply to: Lumenari
I wish Doctors would recommend alternatives too. The thing is...even Doctors, scientists etc. don't always agree on everything. So that leaves people with cancer and their families on a wild search for the best options. I hope someday there is a cure for everyone. That is my wish.
originally posted by: Bigbrooklyn
Check out Dr Tullio Simonini... Cures cancer with baking soda and human grade peroxide... Japan opened a clinic for him after his home country of Italy rejected him.ea reply to: Nathan-D
originally posted by: one4all
originally posted by: Bigbrooklyn
Check out Dr Tullio Simonini... Cures cancer with baking soda and human grade peroxide... Japan opened a clinic for him after his home country of Italy rejected him.ea reply to: Nathan-D
Solid link,,,should say kills parasites with baking soda and huiman grade peroxide by making the entire body incompatable to parasitic life....after that treatment a shot of Auwasca to get those hard to target brain bugs and you are as good as new literally.Anyone can do it anytime.Its no coincidence so many people who get rid of the brain bugs turn their entire lives around.
Can we eat to starve cancer? | William Li
William Li presents a new way to think about cancer treatment: angiogenesis, targeting the blood vessels that feed a tumor. The crucial first (and best) step: Eating cancer-fighting foods that beat cancer at its own game.